Hi manupoonia,Good instinct to question this, because the wording
does feel like it should matter. The key is the phrase you may have skimmed past: Ricardo
"returns it to the shelf" before the second pick.
That return is what makes both draws happen from the
full set of
20 books. That's exactly why Karishma and Bunuel used
20 in the denominator both times - (
12/20) for math and (
2/20) for chemistry - instead of shrinking the shelf to
19 for the second draw.
So to answer directly: no, the problem is
not removing the first book. Because it's replaced, the second draw sees all
20 books again, and yes - he could in principle draw the very same physical book he just read.
But here's why that possibility doesn't affect this answer at all: we're only asked for the probability of
one math and one chemistry book. A math book and a chemistry book are, by definition, two different books. So the outcome we're counting can
never be "same book twice" - that case only exists for something like "two math books," which isn't what we want. The replacement detail keeps the denominator at
20; the "different book" worry never even comes into play for a math-and-chem result.
A quick way to feel it:- Roll a die, then roll it
again (the die is "returned" each time). P(rolling a
2, then a
5) = (
1/6)(
1/6). The denominator stays
6 both times - the first roll doesn't shrink the die.
- Getting a
2 and a
5 is automatically two different faces, so "can I repeat?" doesn't change that count.
Same structure here: return = independent draws = denominator stays
20, and a math-and-chem result is always two distinct books anyway.
Answer: Cmanupoonia
So, are we considering the possibility that when Ricardo picked up the second book, that is the one that he is going to take home, if he is not going to pick the first book that he read in the library? It's not explicitly mentioned in the question, but are we looking at that possibility?