GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Jan 2019, 21:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

January 20, 2019

January 20, 2019

07:00 AM PST

07:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

January 19, 2019

January 19, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

# Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1152
Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 14 Dec 2018, 06:29
10
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

73% (01:23) correct 27% (01:36) wrong based on 577 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Project CR Butler:Day 37:Critical Reasoning (CR2)

Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the Americas less than 20,000 years ago by crossing a land bridge into North America. But recent discoveries of human shelters in South America dating from 32,000 years ago have led researchers to speculate that people arrived in South America first, after voyaging across the Pacific, and then spread northward.

Which of the following, if it were discovered, would be pertinent evidence against the speculation above?

(A) A rock shelter near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, contains evidence of use by human beings 19,000 years ago.

(B) Some North American sites of human habitation predate any sites found in South America.

(C) The climate is warmer at the 32,000-year-old South American site than at the oldest known North American site.

(D) The site in South America that was occupied 32,000 years ago was continuously occupied until 6,000 years ago.

(E) The last Ice Age, between 11,500 and 20,000 years ago, considerably lowered worldwide sea levels

Originally posted by goalsnr on 18 Jul 2008, 09:43.
Last edited by hazelnut on 14 Dec 2018, 06:29, edited 4 times in total.
Updated
Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 200
Re: Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2008, 11:30
goalsnr wrote:
Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the Americas less than 20,000
years ago by crossing a land bridge into North America. But recent discoveries of human
shelters in South America dating from 32,000 years ago have led researchers to speculate that
people arrived in South America first, after voyaging across the Pacific, and then spread
northward.
Which of the following, if it were discovered, would be pertinent evidence against the
speculation above?

A. A rock shelter near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, contains evidence of use by human beings19,000 years ago.

B. Some North American sites of human habitation predate any sites found in South America.

C. The climate is warmer at the 32,000-year-old South American site than at the oldestknown North American site.

D. The site in South America that was occupied 32,000 years ago was continuously occupieduntil 6,000 years ago.

E. The last Ice Age, between 11,500 and 20,000 years ago, considerably lowered worldwidesea levels

It is surely B since some of the American sites predates any sites found in South America. The argument above claim that people first arrived SA and then spread to all America continent, yet if North American sites are found this indicates that NA's come before SA's
_________________

Please give kudos if you enjoy the explanations that I have given. Thanks

Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Posts: 125
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Copenhagen, ESMT"19
GPA: 3.75
WE: Consulting (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2017, 21:49
Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the Americas less than 20,000 years ago by crossing a land bridge into North America. But recent discoveries of human shelters in South America dating from 32,000 years ago have led researchers to speculate that people arrived in South America first, after voyaging across the Pacific, and then spread northward.

Speculation is that people first entered south america and then moved to north America. We have to find any evidence which is against the above conclusion.

A. A rock shelter near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, contains evidence of use by human beings 19,000 years ago. .Humane were there 19000 years ago no effect on conclusion

B. Some North American sites of human habitation predate any sites found in South America.means people might have come to north america first...

C. The climate is warmer at the 32,000-year-old South American site than at the oldestknown North American site. more chance people moved to south america first

D. The site in South America that was occupied 32,000 years ago was continuously occupied until 6,000 years ago. no info about north amrica

E. The last Ice Age, between 11,500 and 20,000 years ago, considerably lowered worldwidesea level . out of scope
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2174
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Dec 2018, 22:33
goalsnr wrote:

Project CR Butler:Day 37:Critical Reasoning (CR2)

Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the Americas less than 20,000 years ago by crossing a land bridge into North America. But recent discoveries of human shelters in South America dating from 32,000 years ago have led researchers to speculate that people arrived in South America first, after voyaging across the Pacific, and then spread northward.

Which of the following, if it were discovered, would be pertinent evidence against the speculation above?

(A) A rock shelter near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, contains evidence of use by human beings 19,000 years ago.

(B) Some North American sites of human habitation predate any sites found in South America.

(C) The climate is warmer at the 32,000-year-old South American site than at the oldest known North American site.

(D) The site in South America that was occupied 32,000 years ago was continuously occupied until 6,000 years ago.

(E) The last Ice Age, between 11,500 and 20,000 years ago, considerably lowered worldwide sea levels

The actual premise says, "Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the Americas less than 20,000 years ago by crossing a land bridge into North America." This is followed by the word "but"...THIS IS A CLASSIC SETUP ON THE GMAT. The author of the stimulus is not saying that the migration happened less than 20 thousand years ago. He or she is saying that someone (in this case archaeologists) believe it. With the word "but" we have a negation and we see that the author of the stimulus does not take the belief as a fact and is indeed contradicting it immediately.
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8795
Location: Pune, India
Re: Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2018, 05:52
goalsnr wrote:

Project CR Butler:Day 37:Critical Reasoning (CR2)

Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the Americas less than 20,000 years ago by crossing a land bridge into North America. But recent discoveries of human shelters in South America dating from 32,000 years ago have led researchers to speculate that people arrived in South America first, after voyaging across the Pacific, and then spread northward.

Which of the following, if it were discovered, would be pertinent evidence against the speculation above?

(A) A rock shelter near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, contains evidence of use by human beings 19,000 years ago.

(B) Some North American sites of human habitation predate any sites found in South America.

(C) The climate is warmer at the 32,000-year-old South American site than at the oldest known North American site.

(D) The site in South America that was occupied 32,000 years ago was continuously occupied until 6,000 years ago.

(E) The last Ice Age, between 11,500 and 20,000 years ago, considerably lowered worldwide sea levels

Old Belief: People first reached the Americas less than 20,000 years ago by crossing a land bridge into North America.
Discovery: Human shelters in South America dating from 32,000 years ago
Speculation: People arrived in South America first, after voyaging across the Pacific, and then spread northward.

We need evidence against speculation.

(A) A rock shelter near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, contains evidence of use by human beings 19,000 years ago.
In either case (first reaching NA by land or SA by sea), one would expect a shelter in Pennsylvania. So it doesn't go against the speculation.

(B) Some North American sites of human habitation predate any sites found in South America.
North American sites are older than any SA sites. So if sites have been found in SA dating 32,000 yrs ago, there are sites in NA predating those. Hence, this is evidence against first arrival in SA (our speculation). This is the answer.

(C) The climate is warmer at the 32,000-year-old South American site than at the oldest known North American site.
Warmer/colder climate has no understandable relevance to us and hence this is irrelevant.

(D) The site in South America that was occupied 32,000 years ago was continuously occupied until 6,000 years ago.
Continuous occupation of the site makes no difference. Some people from the site could have traveled to NA so it is in agreement with our speculation.

(E) The last Ice Age, between 11,500 and 20,000 years ago, considerably lowered worldwide sea levels
What happened 11,500 and 20,000 years ago is irrelevant. We have found a site in SA of 32,000 yrs ago. If people still did not first arrive in SA, we need to know what happened more than 32000 yrs ago, say what happened 35,000 years ago. This is irrelevant.

_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Re: Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the &nbs [#permalink] 20 Dec 2018, 05:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by