Last visit was: 27 Jul 2024, 00:00 It is currently 27 Jul 2024, 00:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94619
Own Kudos [?]: 644220 [64]
Given Kudos: 86770
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Posts: 3125
Own Kudos [?]: 5186 [20]
Given Kudos: 1859
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94619
Own Kudos [?]: 644220 [9]
Given Kudos: 86770
Send PM
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Apr 2022
Posts: 80
Own Kudos [?]: 52 [3]
Given Kudos: 165
Location: India
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all numbers x such that |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2?

A. 1 < x <6
B. 1.5 < x < 5.5
C. 2 < x < 5
D. 2.5 < x < 4.5
E. 3 < x < 4

Solution :
Let Put x=2
then
|2-3|+|2-4|<2
1+2=3
3<2
not possible so option A,B eliminate
put value x=2.5
|2.5-3|+|2.5-4|
0.5+1.5=2
so 2=2
so option c rejected
put x=2.6
it satisfy the value
so answer can Option D
in option E it is some part which is accepted but whole range is Option D
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Posts: 8014
Own Kudos [?]: 4256 [0]
Given Kudos: 243
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1:
545 Q79 V79 DI73
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all [#permalink]
for given number line |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2 value of x will be possible at both same signs
we get
x<4.5 +ve and
x>2.5 -ve
2.5 < x < 4.5
option D

Bunuel wrote:
On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all numbers x such that |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2?

A. 1 < x <6
B. 1.5 < x < 5.5
C. 2 < x < 5
D. 2.5 < x < 4.5
E. 3 < x < 4
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 3036
Own Kudos [?]: 6633 [9]
Given Kudos: 1646
Send PM
Re: On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all [#permalink]
9
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all numbers x such that |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2?

A. 1 < x <6
B. 1.5 < x < 5.5
C. 2 < x < 5
D. 2.5 < x < 4.5
E. 3 < x < 4


The x = 3 and x = 4 are the critical values to consider when we evaluate the absolute value expressions. According to the critical values, we have the following cases.

Case 1: x < 3

|x – 3| + |x – 4| < 2
(-x + 3) + (-x + 4) < 2
-2x + 7 < 2
5 < 2x
2.5 < x => 2.5 < x < 3 [We have to combine the solution with the constraint x < 3.]

Case 2: 3 ≤ x < 4

|x – 3| + |x – 4| < 2
(x – 3) + (-x + 4) < 2
1 < 2 => 3 ≤ x < 4 [Although the inequality 1 < 2 is true for all x, we have to consider the constraint 3 ≤ x < 4 as well.]

Case 3: 4 ≤ x

|x – 3| + |x – 4| < 2
(x – 3) + (x – 4) < 2
2x – 7 < 2
2x < 9
x < 4.5 => 4 ≤ x < 4.5 [We have to combine the solution with the constraint 4 ≤ x.]

Now, we have to join the three intervals we found in the three cases:

2.5 < x < 3
3 ≤ x < 4
4 ≤ x < 4.5

So, we have:

2.5 < x < 4.5

Answer: D
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Sep 2023
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Switzerland
Send PM
Re: On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all [#permalink]
1
Kudos
 
JeffTargetTestPrep wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all numbers x such that |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2?

A. 1 < x <6
B. 1.5 < x < 5.5
C. 2 < x < 5
D. 2.5 < x < 4.5
E. 3 < x < 4


The x = 3 and x = 4 are the critical values to consider when we evaluate the absolute value expressions. According to the critical values, we have the following cases.

Case 1: x < 3

|x – 3| + |x – 4| < 2
(-x + 3) + (-x + 4) < 2
-2x + 7 < 2
5 < 2x
2.5 < x => 2.5 < x < 3 [We have to combine the solution with the constraint x < 3.]

Case 2: 3 ≤ x < 4

|x – 3| + |x – 4| < 2
(x – 3) + (-x + 4) < 2
1 < 2 => 3 ≤ x < 4 [Although the inequality 1 < 2 is true for all x, we have to consider the constraint 3 ≤ x < 4 as well.]

Case 3: 4 ≤ x

|x – 3| + |x – 4| < 2
(x – 3) + (x – 4) < 2
2x – 7 < 2
2x < 9
x < 4.5 => 4 ≤ x < 4.5 [We have to combine the solution with the constraint 4 ≤ x.]

Now, we have to join the three intervals we found in the three cases:

2.5 < x < 3
3 ≤ x < 4
4 ≤ x < 4.5

So, we have:

2.5 < x < 4.5

Answer: D

­­­Hi JeffTargetTestPrep

Would it be possible that you further elaborate on your solution? I somehow cannot really follow.It would be very helpful for me to know:

1. How did you come up with these 3 cases? I understand that at x=3 and x=4, the absolute value expressions become zero. However, I do not understand why you set the inequality signs in that particular direction e.g. why do we test for x<3 but then for 4 ≤ x? What's the reasoning that once x is less than and the other times is greater than? 

2. Furthermore, I would greatly appreciate if you could explain why you changed the order of operations whilst testing the differnet cases (at least for case 1 and 2).  For example here:
|x – 3| + |x – 4| < 2
(-x + 3) + (-x + 4) < 2 --> why do we have neg. x now and+ 3 / 4? 


Needless to say I am not familiar with this underlying concept of determining the interval of all possible values of x for absolute value expressions, so if there is any blog posts or other ressources explaining this, I would greatly appreciate it (I could not find anything myself upon my inital reserach). 

Many thanks for your support.

Kind wishes 

Lara 
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94619
Own Kudos [?]: 644220 [0]
Given Kudos: 86770
Send PM
Re: On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Check vey similar question, also from GMAT Prep Focus, here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/on-the-numbe ... 26797.html
Tutor
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Posts: 425
Own Kudos [?]: 1215 [4]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Send PM
Re: On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all [#permalink]
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all numbers x such that |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2?

A. 1 < x <6
B. 1.5 < x < 5.5
C. 2 < x < 5
D. 2.5 < x < 4.5
E. 3 < x < 4

­There's a great timesaver on this one:

Since all of the maximum values are different, we could just find the max, instead of worrying about all three ranges (including x < 3 and  3 < x < 4) shown in the solutions above.

The easiest case is if x > 4, then all of the values inside the absolute value signs will be positive, so the absolute value signs go away, and we get:

x - 3 + x - 4 < 2
2x - 7 < 2 
2x < 9
x < 4.5

Since only one choice has 4.5 as the max, we can select D without worrying about the minimum. (Note that the question asks for "the set of ALL numbers X such that...", so the answer choice must exactly match the maximum value. Other wording, such as what "could" be true, might not ­match exactly.)­
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Oct 2020
Posts: 38
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all [#permalink]
JeffTargetTestPrep Bunuel could you please clarify when we use less than (<), and when we use less than equal to (<=) for the ranges? thanks!
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Jul 2023
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Would it be correct to calculate it by testing just these 2 cases focusing on the number 2? Or is it just a coincidence that I have reached the same answer?

Case 1.)

|x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2
2x-7 < 2
X < 4.5

Case 2)

|x - 3| + |x - 4| < -2
2x-7 < -2
2x < -5
x > 2.5
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Jan 2020
Posts: 27
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Re: On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all [#permalink]
Nikolavin wrote:
Would it be correct to calculate it by testing just these 2 cases focusing on the number 2? Or is it just a coincidence that I have reached the same answer?

Case 1.)

|x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2
2x-7 < 2
X < 4.5

Case 2)

|x - 3| + |x - 4| < -2
2x-7 < -2
2x < -5
x > 2.5

­Your case 2) is not correct, it needs to be 
2x-7 < -2
2x < +5
X < 2.5


Anyway, you cannot create this inequality |x - 3| + |x - 4| < -2 since it is not correct from the start. The absolute value always >= 0 so |x - 3| + |x - 4| = (>0) + (>0) need to be >= 0 as well.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
94619 posts