Last visit was: 03 Dec 2024, 11:20 It is currently 03 Dec 2024, 11:20
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,508
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,172
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,508
Kudos: 682,795
 [108]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
100
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,508
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,172
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,508
Kudos: 682,795
 [14]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
JeffTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 3,023
Own Kudos:
7,165
 [10]
Given Kudos: 1,646
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Expert reply
Posts: 3,023
Kudos: 7,165
 [10]
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
harshittahuja
Joined: 18 Apr 2022
Last visit: 13 Nov 2024
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
54
 [4]
Given Kudos: 165
Location: India
GPA: 3
Posts: 79
Kudos: 54
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all numbers x such that |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2?

A. 1 < x <6
B. 1.5 < x < 5.5
C. 2 < x < 5
D. 2.5 < x < 4.5
E. 3 < x < 4

Solution :
Let Put x=2
then
|2-3|+|2-4|<2
1+2=3
3<2
not possible so option A,B eliminate
put value x=2.5
|2.5-3|+|2.5-4|
0.5+1.5=2
so 2=2
so option c rejected
put x=2.6
it satisfy the value
so answer can Option D
in option E it is some part which is accepted but whole range is Option D
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 8,117
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
Posts: 8,117
Kudos: 4,472
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
for given number line |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2 value of x will be possible at both same signs
we get
x<4.5 +ve and
x>2.5 -ve
2.5 < x < 4.5
option D

Bunuel
On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all numbers x such that |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2?

A. 1 < x <6
B. 1.5 < x < 5.5
C. 2 < x < 5
D. 2.5 < x < 4.5
E. 3 < x < 4
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 3,127
Own Kudos:
6,856
 [26]
Given Kudos: 1,860
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Products:
Posts: 3,127
Kudos: 6,856
 [26]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all numbers x such that |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2?

A. 1 < x <6
B. 1.5 < x < 5.5
C. 2 < x < 5
D. 2.5 < x < 4.5
E. 3 < x < 4

We can divide our analysis into three regions and open the modulus operator according to the positive-negative nature in that region

  • Region 1: x < 3
  • Region 2: 3 < x < 4
  • Region 3: x > 4

Region 1: x < 3

\(-(x-3) - (x-4) < 2\)

\(-2x < -5\)

\(x > 2.5\)

Region 2: 3 < x < 4

\((x-3) - (x-4) < 2\)

\(1 < 2\)

Hence, the entire region satisfies the inequality.

\(3 < x < 4\)

Region 3: x > 4

\(x - 3 + x - 4 > 2\)

\(2x < 9\)

\(x < 4.5\)

The inequality satisfies at the critical points, i.e. at x = 3 and at x = 4

Combined: 2.5 < x < 4.5

Option D
Attachments

Screenshot 2023-08-06 230152.jpg
Screenshot 2023-08-06 230152.jpg [ 57.86 KiB | Viewed 25046 times ]

User avatar
Laracbo
Joined: 25 Sep 2023
Last visit: 10 Jun 2024
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
37
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 7
Kudos: 37
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
JeffTargetTestPrep
Bunuel
On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all numbers x such that |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2?

A. 1 < x <6
B. 1.5 < x < 5.5
C. 2 < x < 5
D. 2.5 < x < 4.5
E. 3 < x < 4

The x = 3 and x = 4 are the critical values to consider when we evaluate the absolute value expressions. According to the critical values, we have the following cases.

Case 1: x < 3

|x – 3| + |x – 4| < 2
(-x + 3) + (-x + 4) < 2
-2x + 7 < 2
5 < 2x
2.5 < x => 2.5 < x < 3 [We have to combine the solution with the constraint x < 3.]

Case 2: 3 ≤ x < 4

|x – 3| + |x – 4| < 2
(x – 3) + (-x + 4) < 2
1 < 2 => 3 ≤ x < 4 [Although the inequality 1 < 2 is true for all x, we have to consider the constraint 3 ≤ x < 4 as well.]

Case 3: 4 ≤ x

|x – 3| + |x – 4| < 2
(x – 3) + (x – 4) < 2
2x – 7 < 2
2x < 9
x < 4.5 => 4 ≤ x < 4.5 [We have to combine the solution with the constraint 4 ≤ x.]

Now, we have to join the three intervals we found in the three cases:

2.5 < x < 3
3 ≤ x < 4
4 ≤ x < 4.5

So, we have:

2.5 < x < 4.5

Answer: D
­­­Hi JeffTargetTestPrep

Would it be possible that you further elaborate on your solution? I somehow cannot really follow.It would be very helpful for me to know:

1. How did you come up with these 3 cases? I understand that at x=3 and x=4, the absolute value expressions become zero. However, I do not understand why you set the inequality signs in that particular direction e.g. why do we test for x<3 but then for 4 ≤ x? What's the reasoning that once x is less than and the other times is greater than? 

2. Furthermore, I would greatly appreciate if you could explain why you changed the order of operations whilst testing the differnet cases (at least for case 1 and 2).  For example here:
|x – 3| + |x – 4| < 2
(-x + 3) + (-x + 4) < 2 --> why do we have neg. x now and+ 3 / 4? 


Needless to say I am not familiar with this underlying concept of determining the interval of all possible values of x for absolute value expressions, so if there is any blog posts or other ressources explaining this, I would greatly appreciate it (I could not find anything myself upon my inital reserach). 

Many thanks for your support.

Kind wishes 

Lara 
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,508
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,172
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,508
Kudos: 682,795
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Check vey similar question, also from GMAT Prep Focus, here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/on-the-numbe ... 26797.html
User avatar
GMATCoachBen
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Last visit: 02 Dec 2024
Posts: 425
Own Kudos:
1,660
 [7]
Given Kudos: 205
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Products:
Expert reply
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Posts: 425
Kudos: 1,660
 [7]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all numbers x such that |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2?

A. 1 < x <6
B. 1.5 < x < 5.5
C. 2 < x < 5
D. 2.5 < x < 4.5
E. 3 < x < 4
­There's a great timesaver on this one:

Since all of the maximum values are different, we could just find the max, instead of worrying about all three ranges (including x < 3 and  3 < x < 4) shown in the solutions above.

The easiest case is if x > 4, then all of the values inside the absolute value signs will be positive, so the absolute value signs go away, and we get:

x - 3 + x - 4 < 2
2x - 7 < 2 
2x < 9
x < 4.5

Since only one choice has 4.5 as the max, we can select D without worrying about the minimum. (Note that the question asks for "the set of ALL numbers X such that...", so the answer choice must exactly match the maximum value. Other wording, such as what "could" be true, might not ­match exactly.)­
User avatar
mollyweasley
Joined: 15 Oct 2020
Last visit: 25 Aug 2024
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 37
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JeffTargetTestPrep Bunuel could you please clarify when we use less than (<), and when we use less than equal to (<=) for the ranges? thanks!
User avatar
Nikolavin
Joined: 15 Jul 2023
Last visit: 08 Aug 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Would it be correct to calculate it by testing just these 2 cases focusing on the number 2? Or is it just a coincidence that I have reached the same answer?

Case 1.)

|x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2
2x-7 < 2
X < 4.5

Case 2)

|x - 3| + |x - 4| < -2
2x-7 < -2
2x < -5
x > 2.5
User avatar
tuyaras
Joined: 26 Jan 2020
Last visit: 26 Sep 2024
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 30
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nikolavin
Would it be correct to calculate it by testing just these 2 cases focusing on the number 2? Or is it just a coincidence that I have reached the same answer?

Case 1.)

|x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2
2x-7 < 2
X < 4.5

Case 2)

|x - 3| + |x - 4| < -2
2x-7 < -2
2x < -5
x > 2.5
­Your case 2) is not correct, it needs to be 
2x-7 < -2
2x < +5
X < 2.5


Anyway, you cannot create this inequality |x - 3| + |x - 4| < -2 since it is not correct from the start. The absolute value always >= 0 so |x - 3| + |x - 4| = (>0) + (>0) need to be >= 0 as well.
User avatar
Utkersh
Joined: 14 Jul 2022
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
Posts: 21
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Hi,

I'm not sure whether the below method is correct conceptually. Can someone please confirm? I solved it using the below concept and got the question correct.

lxl < a (some +ve integer a)

The range of x becomes -a<x<a

In this question

-2<x-3 + x-4<2
-2<2x-7<2
5<2x<9
2.5<x<4.5
User avatar
MalachiKeti
Joined: 01 Sep 2024
Last visit: 29 Nov 2024
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 52
Posts: 69
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Laracbo
Bunuel
On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all numbers x such that |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2?

A. 1 < x <6
B. 1.5 < x < 5.5
C. 2 < x < 5
D. 2.5 < x < 4.5
E. 3 < x < 4

Would it be possible that you further elaborate on your solution? I somehow cannot really follow.It would be very helpful for me to know:

1. How did you come up with these 3 cases? I understand that at x=3 and x=4, the absolute value expressions become zero. However, I do not understand why you set the inequality signs in that particular direction e.g. why do we test for x<3 but then for 4 ≤ x? What's the reasoning that once x is less than and the other times is greater than?

2. Furthermore, I would greatly appreciate if you could explain why you changed the order of operations whilst testing the differnet cases (at least for case 1 and 2). For example here:
|x – 3| + |x – 4| < 2
(-x + 3) + (-x + 4) < 2 --> why do we have neg. x now and+ 3 / 4?

Needless to say I am not familiar with this underlying concept of determining the interval of all possible values of x for absolute value expressions, so if there is any blog posts or other ressources explaining this, I would greatly appreciate it (I could not find anything myself upon my inital reserach).

Many thanks for your support.

Kind wishes

Lara
­
The critical points (aka key points or transition points) for \(|x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2\) are 3 and 4 (those are the values of x for which the expressions in the absolute values become 0). This gives us the following three ranges to consider:

    \(--------(3)--------(4)--------\)\(x < 3\)\(3 ≤ x < 4\)\(4 ≤ x\)

When x moves from one range to another, one of the absolute values we have, |x - 3| or |x - 4|, changes sign when the absolute value is dropped.

1. When \(x < 3\), then:

    \(x - 3 < 0 \), and thus \(|x - 3| = -(x - 3)\) (recall that \(|a| = -a\), when \(a ≤ 0\)).\(x - 4 < 0 \), and thus \(|x - 4| = -(x - 4)\).

Hence, in this range \(|x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2\) becomes \(-(x - 3) - (x - 4) < 2\). This gives \(x > 2.5\). Since we consider \(x < 3\) range, then combining \(x > 2.5\) with \(x < 3\) gives a set for which the inequality holds for the considered range: \(2.5 < x < 3\).

2. When \(3 ≤ x < 4\), we are moving to the second range, then:

    \(x - 3 ≥ 0 \), and thus \(|x - 3| = x - 3\) (recall that \(|a| = a\), when \(a ≥ 0\)). Notice how |x - 3| gets expanded with plus sign here in contrast with minus sign in the previous range.\(x - 4 < 0 \), and thus \(|x - 4| = -(x - 4)\).

Hence, in this range \(|x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2\) becomes \((x - 3) - (x - 4) < 2\). This gives \(1 < 2\)m which is true. This implies that the inequality holds for the entire range we consider: \(3 ≤ x < 4\).

3. When \(4 ≤ x\), we are moving to the thrid range, then:

    \(x - 3 > 0 \), and thus \(|x - 3| = x - 3\).\(x - 4 ≥ 0 \), and thus \(|x - 4| = x - 4\). Notice how |x - 4| gets expanded with plus sign here in contrast with minus sign in the previous range.

Hence, in this range \(|x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2\) becomes \((x - 3) + (x - 4) < 2\). This gives \(x < 4.5\). Since we consider \(4 ≤ x\) range, then combining \(x < 4.5\) with \(4 ≤ x\) gives a set for which the inequality holds for the considered range: \(4 ≤ x < 4.5\).

Therefore, \(|x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2\) holds for the following three ranges:

    \(2.5 < x < 3\)\(3 ≤ x < 4\)\(4 ≤ x < 4.5\)

Observe that these three ranges comprise one continuous range \(2.5 < x < 4.5\), so that's our final answer.

Answer: D

10. Absolute Value



For more check Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread



Hope it helps.­
    x<33≤x<44≤x

How did we decide these ranges after arriving at the nodal points where expression becomes 0? For example why is the equal to sign in 3 in the second range and not the first
Bunuel
User avatar
MalachiKeti
Joined: 01 Sep 2024
Last visit: 29 Nov 2024
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 52
Posts: 69
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATCoachBen
Bunuel
On the number line, which of the following specifies the set of all numbers x such that |x - 3| + |x - 4| < 2?

A. 1 < x <6
B. 1.5 < x < 5.5
C. 2 < x < 5
D. 2.5 < x < 4.5
E. 3 < x < 4
­There's a great timesaver on this one:

Since all of the maximum values are different, we could just find the max, instead of worrying about all three ranges (including x < 3 and 3 < x < 4) shown in the solutions above.

The easiest case is if x > 4, then all of the values inside the absolute value signs will be positive, so the absolute value signs go away, and we get:

x - 3 + x - 4 < 2
2x - 7 < 2
2x < 9
x < 4.5

Since only one choice has 4.5 as the max, we can select D without worrying about the minimum. (Note that the question asks for "the set of ALL numbers X such that...", so the answer choice must exactly match the maximum value. Other wording, such as what "could" be true, might not ­match exactly.)­
What does this line mean?
(Note that the question asks for "the set of ALL numbers X such that...", so the answer choice must exactly match the maximum value. Other wording, such as what "could" be true, might not ­match exactly.)­
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,508
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,172
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,508
Kudos: 682,795
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MalachiKeti
    x<33≤x<44≤x

How did we decide these ranges after arriving at the nodal points where expression becomes 0? For example why is the equal to sign in 3 in the second range and not the first
Bunuel

When determining the intervals around the critical points, it's important to include each critical point in one of the intervals. It doesn't matter which interval includes the equal sign for a critical point, as long as all critical points are accounted for. Whether you write the intervals as x < 3, 3 ≤ x < 4, and x ≥ 4, or x ≤ 3, 3 < x ≤ 4, and x > 4, the solution will be the same. The key is to ensure every critical point is included without any gaps or overlaps.

Thus, as long as you include the equal sign at each critical point, it doesn't matter which interval it’s assigned to.
Moderator:
Math Expert
97508 posts