The passage is relatively straightforward.
Here's my mind map answers.
Para1: Benefits of Africanization --> increases resistance to some mite --> which is devastating in Europe but not in Africa (even without any external care) --> some researchers says its due to African bee's shorter development period, which is preventing mites from reaching maturity --> conclusion is that Africanization is the best solution1. The passage suggests that which of the following was true of the honeybee colonies described in line 4-6?(A) Their life expectancy, when free of disease, was shorter than that of European bee colonies in North America.
We don't know what happens when the bees are free of the disease(B) They were not Africanized.
Correct. They were not Africanized and hence "destroyed"(C) Their life cycle did not accommodate the feeding habits of Varroa jacobsoni.
No evidence for this. We are told that European bees had longer development cycle and hence bees were able to reach maturity, but we are told nothing about the mite's feeding habit(D) They responded well to measures to control Varroa jacobsoni.
180 degrees colonies were destroyed(E) They were managed using methods that were more modern than those employed in Brazil.
No evidence for this2. The author cites all of the following as evidence that Africanized bees’ resistance to Varroa jacobsoni is superior to that of European bees EXCEPT:(A) Fewer Varroa jacobsoni mites reproduce in Africanized bees.
Evidence: "But fewer mites reproduce in Africanized bees than in European bees"(B) Varroa jacobsoni is killing many bee colonies in Europe.
Evidence: "In parts of Europe, this mite is devastating honeybees"(C) Beekeepers in Brazil have not used preventive measures to protect their colonies.
Evidence: "even though beekeepers there undertook no preventive measures"(D) Brazilian bee colonies have endured Varroa jacobsoni since 1972.
Evidence: "Varroa jacobsoni has been present in Africanized bees since 1972 without the loss of a single colony" (E) At least some European bee colonies have been saved by preventive measures.
No evidence for this, so this is our answer3. According to the passage, research suggests that one possible reason the Africanized bees in Brazil have successfully resisted Varroa jacobsoni is that(A) the life cycle of the Africanized bee may limit the Varroa jacobsoni mite’s opportunity to reach full development
Straightforward: "resistance may be related to the Africanized worker bee’s shorter development period" (B) the Africanized bees may have had an opportunity to develop a chemical resistance to Varroa jacobsoni
OOS(C) the location of bee colonies in Brazil may provide a natural deterrent to Varroa jacobsoni
OOS(D) Varroa jacobsoni may be relatively new to Brazil and may not have had time to become widespread
OOS(E) beekeepers may have developed effective control techniques for Varroa jacobsoni
OOS4. The author’s argument regarding the resistance of Africanized bees to Varroa jacobsoni would be most weakened if which of the following were true?(A) The bees in Brazil were resistant before being Africanized.
This destroys the argument by saying that the resistance was not due to the bees being africanized but by some other reason that was present before africanizing them(B) The number of bee colonies in North American increased dramatically whereas the number in Brazil remained unchanged.
This is does not provide evidence for improved resistance. The increased numbers could be due to multiple other factors like climate conditions, potency, etc.(C) Mites found in European bees reproduce at a faster rate than mites of identical species found in the bees in Brazil.
Even if this were true the passage says that the longer development cycles of European bees are more conducive than the shorter ones of African bees. So this doesn't weak or attack author's argument(D) Africanized bees retain many of the characteristics of European bees.
OOS(E) Bee colonies in Europe continue to produce greater quantities of honey than do those in Brazil
OOSPlease hit Kudos if you liked the explanation!