Last visit was: 28 Apr 2024, 11:48 It is currently 28 Apr 2024, 11:48

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2011
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1005
Own Kudos [?]: 3122 [0]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2011
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1005
Own Kudos [?]: 3122 [0]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Usage of Word "Exactly" In Quant Problems [#permalink]
alexcey wrote:
But then how does one refer to the number of all prime factors in a number then?

Here is what MGMAT says on page 122 of the Number Properties guide:
1. How many different prime factors? ... maybe phrased as "different" or "unique" prime factors
2. How many total prime factors (length)?
3. How many total factors?

Another question that I have is for a statement like this one "Set A has 2 numbers". Does it mean on GMAT that set A can have 3 and more numbers?

As seen from your post itself, that would be the prime factor length

eg: 1080 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 5

The number of different prime factors would be 3 (2,3 and 5)
The prime factor length would be 7

And IMHO set A has two numbers means only that. i.e It has only two numbers. If it had said "at least two numbers" it would mean that set A has two or more numbers.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14836
Own Kudos [?]: 64976 [0]
Given Kudos: 428
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Usage of Word "Exactly" In Quant Problems [#permalink]
Expert Reply
alexcey wrote:
I'm confused about the meaning of the word "exactly" on the GMAT Quant section. I was looking today at a problem from Jeff Sackman's problem set (DS set, question 17) and choice A for a data sufficiency question had this statement:

1. y has exactly two prime factors.

I originally understood this statement as "y has two prime factors and no more". So for instance, 4 has exactly 2 prime factors: 2 and 2. However, the author of the set treats the wording as "y has two unique prime factors", in which case "4 has exactly 1 unique primer factor". I've searched on the Internet and it looks like GmatPrep uses similar wording in one problem:


Does anybody have an idea on what the official stance on this usage is? I've seen the word "exactly" in several other DS questions as well, especially the ones related to sets.


The usage can vary a little from question to question but in most cases the intended meaning is quite clear.

y has two prime factors
=
y has exactly two prime factors
=
y has two distinct prime factors
=
y has exactly two distinct prime factors (gives the meaning clearly so is most preferred)

'Set A has two members' means 'Set A has exactly two members and no more'

There is a source of confusion in this concept. Let's discuss that with an example.
There were 100 people at a party. The food at the party consisted of three things - cake, candy and corn.

'50 people ate cake'
This means exactly 50 people ate cake. The other 50 did not eat cake. The only thing is that of these 50 people, some or all could have eaten something else too. This statement doesn't imply that these 50 did not eat anything else. You have to remember this.

'50 people ate only cake'
This is different. This means 50 ate cake and nothing else.

50 people belong to group1 means exactly 50 belong to group1 but the point is that they could belong to other groups too.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Usage of Word "Exactly" In Quant Problems [#permalink]
Moderator:
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne