It is currently 21 Nov 2017, 21:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Usage of Word "Exactly" In Quant Problems

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2011
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

Usage of Word "Exactly" In Quant Problems [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2012, 00:09
I'm confused about the meaning of the word "exactly" on the GMAT Quant section. I was looking today at a problem from Jeff Sackman's problem set (DS set, question 17) and choice A for a data sufficiency question had this statement:

1. y has exactly two prime factors.

I originally understood this statement as "y has two prime factors and no more". So for instance, 4 has exactly 2 prime factors: 2 and 2. However, the author of the set treats the wording as "y has two unique prime factors", in which case "4 has exactly 1 unique primer factor". I've searched on the Internet and it looks like GmatPrep uses similar wording in one problem:

"130) Positive integer k has exactly 2 positive prime factors, 3 and 7."
http://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-nu ... 50409.html

Does anybody have an idea on what the official stance on this usage is? I've seen the word "exactly" in several other DS questions as well, especially the ones related to sets.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

 e-GMAT Discount Codes Manhattan GMAT Discount Codes Optimus Prep Discount Codes
VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1216

Kudos [?]: 1692 [0], given: 116

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Usage of Word "Exactly" In Quant Problems [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2012, 02:23
alexcey wrote:
I'm confused about the meaning of the word "exactly" on the GMAT Quant section. I was looking today at a problem from Jeff Sackman's problem set (DS set, question 17) and choice A for a data sufficiency question had this statement:

1. y has exactly two prime factors.

I originally understood this statement as "y has two prime factors and no more". So for instance, 4 has exactly 2 prime factors: 2 and 2. However, the author of the set treats the wording as "y has two unique prime factors", in which case "4 has exactly 1 unique primer factor". I've searched on the Internet and it looks like GmatPrep uses similar wording in one problem:

"130) Positive integer k has exactly 2 positive prime factors, 3 and 7."
http://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-nu ... 50409.html

Does anybody have an idea on what the official stance on this usage is? I've seen the word "exactly" in several other DS questions as well, especially the ones related to sets.

y has two prime factors means that y has to unique factors. It cannot be taken to mean 2 & 2. In this instance y cannot be 4. The least possible positive value for y is 6.

As far as sets are concerned, we often see something like "10 people are in exactly two groups". That means that those ten people are not in more than two groups. That is people who are in all three groups are not accounted for in this 10. The significance of this can be seen from Bunuel's explanation in the below page:

formulae-for-3-overlapping-sets-69014.html
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Kudos [?]: 1692 [0], given: 116

Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2011
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

Re: Usage of Word "Exactly" In Quant Problems [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2012, 02:47
But then how does one refer to the number of all prime factors in a number then?

Here is what MGMAT says on page 122 of the Number Properties guide:
1. How many different prime factors? ... maybe phrased as "different" or "unique" prime factors
2. How many total prime factors (length)?
3. How many total factors?

Another question that I have is for a statement like this one "Set A has 2 numbers". Does it mean on GMAT that set A can have 3 and more numbers?

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1216

Kudos [?]: 1692 [0], given: 116

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Usage of Word "Exactly" In Quant Problems [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2012, 03:24
alexcey wrote:
But then how does one refer to the number of all prime factors in a number then?

Here is what MGMAT says on page 122 of the Number Properties guide:
1. How many different prime factors? ... maybe phrased as "different" or "unique" prime factors
2. How many total prime factors (length)?
3. How many total factors?

Another question that I have is for a statement like this one "Set A has 2 numbers". Does it mean on GMAT that set A can have 3 and more numbers?

As seen from your post itself, that would be the prime factor length

eg: 1080 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 5

The number of different prime factors would be 3 (2,3 and 5)
The prime factor length would be 7

And IMHO set A has two numbers means only that. i.e It has only two numbers. If it had said "at least two numbers" it would mean that set A has two or more numbers.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Kudos [?]: 1692 [0], given: 116

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7743

Kudos [?]: 17838 [0], given: 235

Location: Pune, India
Re: Usage of Word "Exactly" In Quant Problems [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2012, 20:32
alexcey wrote:
I'm confused about the meaning of the word "exactly" on the GMAT Quant section. I was looking today at a problem from Jeff Sackman's problem set (DS set, question 17) and choice A for a data sufficiency question had this statement:

1. y has exactly two prime factors.

I originally understood this statement as "y has two prime factors and no more". So for instance, 4 has exactly 2 prime factors: 2 and 2. However, the author of the set treats the wording as "y has two unique prime factors", in which case "4 has exactly 1 unique primer factor". I've searched on the Internet and it looks like GmatPrep uses similar wording in one problem:

"130) Positive integer k has exactly 2 positive prime factors, 3 and 7."
http://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-nu ... 50409.html

Does anybody have an idea on what the official stance on this usage is? I've seen the word "exactly" in several other DS questions as well, especially the ones related to sets.

The usage can vary a little from question to question but in most cases the intended meaning is quite clear.

y has two prime factors
=
y has exactly two prime factors
=
y has two distinct prime factors
=
y has exactly two distinct prime factors (gives the meaning clearly so is most preferred)

'Set A has two members' means 'Set A has exactly two members and no more'

There is a source of confusion in this concept. Let's discuss that with an example.
There were 100 people at a party. The food at the party consisted of three things - cake, candy and corn.

'50 people ate cake'
This means exactly 50 people ate cake. The other 50 did not eat cake. The only thing is that of these 50 people, some or all could have eaten something else too. This statement doesn't imply that these 50 did not eat anything else. You have to remember this.

'50 people ate only cake'
This is different. This means 50 ate cake and nothing else.

50 people belong to group1 means exactly 50 belong to group1 but the point is that they could belong to other groups too.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17838 [0], given: 235

Re: Usage of Word "Exactly" In Quant Problems   [#permalink] 10 Dec 2012, 20:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by