Last visit was: 28 Apr 2024, 19:22 It is currently 28 Apr 2024, 19:22

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Feb 2013
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [2]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
Send PM
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1005
Own Kudos [?]: 3122 [2]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
MBA Section Director
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Posts: 8706
Own Kudos [?]: 10019 [1]
Given Kudos: 4542
Test: Test
Send PM
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28581 [3]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Double negation in assumptions CR [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
ishanbhat455 wrote:
Hi,

How do we negate an answer choice containing double negatives in assumptions CR question? Do we have to simply convert both the negatives into positives?

For example, consider these two options:

1. One of the products of firm X could never stay profitable unless it was offered with a discount.

2. There is no way a product can stay profitable if that product is not sold without a discount.

Dear ishanbhat455,
I see MacFauz already gave a good answer, but since you sent me a p.m., I will say a bit as well.

Here's another way to think about it. In each case, the original statement contains a double-negative, and two negatives make a positive, so there must be a way to capture the same meaning without any negatives.

Original #1: One of the products of firm X could never stay profitable unless it was offered with a discount.
Equivalent of #1: One of the products of firm X needs to be offered with a discount in order to stay profitable.
Now that we have a version that's all positive, it's easy to negate it:
Negation of #1: This product of firm X doesn't need to be offered with a discount in order to stay profitable.
or
Negation of #1: This product of firm X can be offered without a discount and still stay profitable.

For #2, I changed it from "a product" (very general) to "this product" --- the first seemed far too general for anything on the GMAT CR.
Original #2: There is no way this product can stay profitable if that product is not sold without a discount.
Equivalent of #2: Selling this product at a discount is absolutely essential for keeping it profitable. .
Negation of #2: Selling this product at a discount is not necessary for keeping it profitable. .
or
Negation of #2: This product can be offered without a discount and still stay profitable. .

You have to be flexible in making the negation. It's not just a matter of adding or subtracting the right combination of words. You always have to think about the meaning, and fine re-phrasings that preserve the correct meaning.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Feb 2013
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Double negation in assumptions CR [#permalink]
MacFauz wrote:
My negation of the statements would be something in the lines of:

1) One of the products of firm X might stay profitable even if it was not offered with a discount.

2) There may be a way for a product to stay profitable even if that product is not sold with a discount.


Thanks Mac. Makes sense.

I guess it really helps to simplify the sentence and then negate. So, the second one can be simplified to sound like- "There is no way a product can stay profitable if that product is sold with a discount." Then negating it seems to be a bit easier.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Feb 2013
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Double negation in assumptions CR [#permalink]
mikemcgarry wrote:
ishanbhat455 wrote:
Hi,

How do we negate an answer choice containing double negatives in assumptions CR question? Do we have to simply convert both the negatives into positives?

For example, consider these two options:

1. One of the products of firm X could never stay profitable unless it was offered with a discount.

2. There is no way a product can stay profitable if that product is not sold without a discount.

Dear ishanbhat455,
I see MacFauz already gave a good answer, but since you sent me a p.m., I will say a bit as well.

Here's another way to think about it. In each case, the original statement contains a double-negative, and two negatives make a positive, so there must be a way to capture the same meaning without any negatives.

Original #1: One of the products of firm X could never stay profitable unless it was offered with a discount.
Equivalent of #1: One of the products of firm X needs to be offered with a discount in order to stay profitable.
Now that we have a version that's all positive, it's easy to negate it:
Negation of #1: This product of firm X doesn't need to be offered with a discount in order to stay profitable.
or
Negation of #1: This product of firm X can be offered without a discount and still stay profitable.

For #2, I changed it from "a product" (very general) to "this product" --- the first seemed far too general for anything on the GMAT CR.
Original #2: There is no way this product can stay profitable if that product is not sold without a discount.
Equivalent of #2: Selling this product at a discount is absolutely essential for keeping it profitable. .
Negation of #2: Selling this product at a discount is not necessary for keeping it profitable. .
or
Negation of #2: This product can be offered without a discount and still stay profitable. .

You have to be flexible in making the negation. It's not just a matter of adding or subtracting the right combination of words. You always have to think about the meaning, and fine re-phrasings that preserve the correct meaning.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)


Thanks Mike. Nice explanation. I seem to agree with the strategy of first simplifying a complex sentence (e.g- loaded with multiple negatives) and then negating it.
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1005
Own Kudos [?]: 3122 [0]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Double negation in assumptions CR [#permalink]
Yup.. Sorry about that.. I 'copy-pasted' the original sentence and didn't edit that out properly.. Have made the change now.. :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17231
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Double negation in assumptions CR [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Double negation in assumptions CR [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13966 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne