Double negation in assumptions CR

Question

Hi,

How do we negate an answer choice containing double negatives in assumptions CR question? Do we have to simply convert both the negatives into positives?

For example, consider these two options:

1. One of the products of firm X could never stay profitable unless it was offered with a discount.

2. There is no way a product can stay profitable if that product is not sold without a discount.

MacFauz · Answer

My negation of the statements would be something in the lines of:

1) One of the products of firm X might stay profitable even if it was not offered with a discount.

2) There may be a way for a product to stay profitable even if that product is not sold with a discount.

Narenn · Answer

Perfect Job Mac !!

mikemcgarry · Answer

Dear ishanbhat455 , I see MacFauz already gave a good answer, but since you sent me a p.m., I will say a bit as well. Here's another way to think about it. In each case, the original statement contains a double-negative, and two negatives make a positive, so there must be a way to capture the same meaning without any negatives. Original #1 : One of the products of firm X could never stay profitable unless it was offered with a discount. Equivalent of #1 : One of the products of firm X needs to be offered with a discount in order to stay profitable. Now that we have a version that's all positive, it's easy to negate it: Negation of #1 : This product of firm X doesn't need to be offered with a discount in order to stay profitable. or Negation of #1 : This product of firm X can be offered without a discount and still stay profitable. For #2, I changed it from "a product" (very general) to "this product" --- the first seemed far too general for anything on the GMAT CR. Original #2: There is no way this product can stay profitable if that product is not sold without a discount . Equivalent of #2 : Selling this product at a discount is absolutely essential for keeping it profitable. . Negation of #2 : Selling this product at a discount is not necessary for keeping it profitable. . or Negation of #2 : This product can be offered without a discount and still stay profitable. . You have to be flexible in making the negation. It's not just a matter of adding or subtracting the right combination of words. You always have to think about the meaning, and fine re-phrasings that preserve the correct meaning. Does all this make sense? Mike :-)

ishanbhat455 · Answer

Thanks Mac. Makes sense.

I guess it really helps to simplify the sentence and then negate. So, the second one can be simplified to sound like- "There is no way a product can stay profitable if that product is  sold with a discount ." Then negating it seems to be a bit easier.

ishanbhat455 · Answer

Thanks Mike. Nice explanation. I seem to agree with the strategy of first simplifying a complex sentence (e.g- loaded with multiple negatives) and then negating it.

MacFauz · Answer

Yup.. Sorry about that.. I 'copy-pasted' the original sentence and didn't edit that out properly.. Have made the change now..

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Double negation in assumptions CR

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards