Last visit was: 29 Apr 2024, 08:38 It is currently 29 Apr 2024, 08:38

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14836
Own Kudos [?]: 64986 [1]
Given Kudos: 428
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 46
Own Kudos [?]: 371 [0]
Given Kudos: 134
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14836
Own Kudos [?]: 64986 [0]
Given Kudos: 428
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 849
Own Kudos [?]: 1562 [0]
Given Kudos: 49
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
What if the question asks for max value of f(x) ??? disregarding the answer choices ??
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14836
Own Kudos [?]: 64986 [0]
Given Kudos: 428
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
Expert Reply
yezz wrote:
What if the question asks for max value of f(x) ??? disregarding the answer choices ??


Not every function will have a minimum and a maximum value. The greater the value of x, the greater the function will become. It is an infinitely increasing function.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Mar 2013
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [1]
Given Kudos: 131
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Many Thanks to all of you for sharing such amazing techniques. I was overwhelmed with mod questions when I started, but your explanations and techniques have helped me build confidence. Bunuel, Karishma, Gurpreet, Shrouded1....Awesome!

How about this approach:

F(x) will be minimum when each individual term in the function has the lowest possible value. So, I get x = 3, -1 and 1/4.
Now, substituting each value of x in F(x), I can easily see that x=1/4 gives me the smallest possible value for F(x) = 4

Thanks,
Rohit
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14836
Own Kudos [?]: 64986 [0]
Given Kudos: 428
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
Expert Reply
eaakbari wrote:
Karishma,

What about a function with evenly spaced numbers?

for instance

f(x) = | 4x + 1| + | 2x + 1| + | 4x + 3| + | x |


What will be the min. value of x for this?


The function will take a minimum value for a range of values of x (between the second and the third values). Think 'Why?'
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14836
Own Kudos [?]: 64986 [1]
Given Kudos: 428
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
rohitd80 wrote:
Many Thanks to all of you for sharing such amazing techniques. I was overwhelmed with mod questions when I started, but your explanations and techniques have helped me build confidence. Bunuel, Karishma, Gurpreet, Shrouded1....Awesome!

How about this approach:

F(x) will be minimum when each individual term in the function has the lowest possible value. So, I get x = 3, -1 and 1/4.
Now, substituting each value of x in F(x), I can easily see that x=1/4 gives me the smallest possible value for F(x) = 4

Thanks,
Rohit


The technique is fine but the logic is not sound. Why should we say that the function will take minimum value only when it takes one of these three values? For one of these values, sure one mod will be 0 but the other two could be much greater.
The reason why this works is because the minimum value will be at one of the transition points - the middle point (logic explained in the post on previous page) in case there are odd number of terms OR at two points (and for every value in between) in case there are even number of terms.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 May 2013
Posts: 314
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [0]
Given Kudos: 134
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
Ok, I get that for f(x) = (4x-1) + (x-3) + (x+1), x must be greater than 1/4, 3 and -1 respectively. But that's where I get lost.

I'm sorry for being so dense on this topic!
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Status:Far, far away!
Posts: 859
Own Kudos [?]: 4892 [2]
Given Kudos: 219
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
WholeLottaLove wrote:
Ok, I get that for f(x) = (4x-1) + (x-3) + (x+1), x must be greater than 1/4, 3 and -1 respectively. But that's where I get lost.

I'm sorry for being so dense on this topic!


Study of the absolute value:

1)take each term into the "| |" and define where it's positive
2)draw a number line with each "edge value" (where each term changes sign)
3)Split the function according to those intervals

Refer to the image

So if x>3 all terms are positive =>f(x) = (4x-1) + (x-3) + (x+1)
if 1/4<x<3 for example you see that 4x-1 is positive, x+1 is positive BUT x-3 is negative => f(x) = (4x-1) + (-)(x-3) + (x+1)

Repeat this operation for each interval and you'll have all possible combinations

Remeber that the each function is valid only in that interval

What I mean is that f(x) = (4x-1) + (-)(x-3) + (x+1) is valid only in the 1/4<x<3 area. Each area has its own function
Attachments

Untitled.png
Untitled.png [ 1.55 KiB | Viewed 3904 times ]

User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Status:Far, far away!
Posts: 859
Own Kudos [?]: 4892 [1]
Given Kudos: 219
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
1
Kudos
WholeLottaLove wrote:
Haha - I am lost (not your fault...I am just very slow with mathematical concepts, unfortunately)

I understand that for certain values of x,(say if x =2) (4x-1) and (x+1) would be positive but (x-3) would be negative. But why would we bother finding what is positive and what is negative? I almost feel as if testing a series of integers and fractions, both positive and negative, would be a quicker way to figure out the right answer. Still, I am trying to get the concepts buttoned down.


What I explained above is how to study an abs value from a theoretical point of view, because you original methos is wrong.

Of course this is not required to answer the question, you can try with real number and see what you find out.
But am I trying to explain how an abs function works, for instance your original method

I. f(x) = (4x-1) + (x-3) + (x+1)

II. f(x) = -(4x-1) + -(x-3) + -(x-1)

does not work to find the answer. The function cannot be reduced to that form!

"But why would we bother finding what is positive and what is negative? "
This is required to study an abs value. In my original post you see the graph of F(X), and you notice that is defined into sections.
Each section is one of the intervals above, and in each one of those the fucntion has a different equation.

The concept that I apply here is the same as the one that you would apply to solve
\(y=|x|\)
How would you study this?
for x>0 => y=x
for x<0 => y=-x

Define where the funct is positive, treat each part as a separate equation. The concept in the question is the same, only involves more intervals.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 May 2013
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: If f(x)= |4x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| (Question of the Day-II) [#permalink]
hI Gurpreet,

Why did you change the value of |x-3| to 3-x,

For x >1/4 and x< 3 f(x) is bigger than 4. because f(x) = 4x-1 + 3-x + x+1 = 4x+3 > 3

Kriti
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14836
Own Kudos [?]: 64986 [0]
Given Kudos: 428
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: If f(x)= |4x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| (Question of the Day-II) [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Kriti2013 wrote:
hI Gurpreet,

Why did you change the value of |x-3| to 3-x,

For x >1/4 and x< 3 f(x) is bigger than 4. because f(x) = 4x-1 + 3-x + x+1 = 4x+3 > 3

Kriti


Because when x is less than 3, (x - 3) is negative.
Therefore, |x-3| = - (x - 3) = 3 - x
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Jul 2012
Status:Finance Analyst
Affiliations: CPA Australia
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 244 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: Australia
Concentration: Finance, Healthcare
Schools: AGSM '16 (A$)
GMAT 1: 470 Q38 V19
GMAT 2: 600 Q44 V34
GPA: 3.5
WE:Accounting (Health Care)
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
eaakbari wrote:
Karishma,

So from your method, I infer

That minimum of a function will always be at either its critical points or zero.

Await your valued response.


The minimum could also be in an entire range. Take this question for example.

f(x) = |3x + 1| + |2x-3| + |x - 7|

For what value(s) of x will f(x) have the minimum value?




Thank you for your intuitive explanation and clearing the concept for us. So using your analogy of people at every point, shouldn't -1/3 have the minimum value for x (or distance so to speak)?

To be precise, you said 1/4 point has the minimum distance for x or gives the minimum value because of the denominator 4 (my assumption - as you did not state it specifically). This is why we chose 1/4 over 3/2!
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14836
Own Kudos [?]: 64986 [1]
Given Kudos: 428
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
vaishnogmat wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
eaakbari wrote:
Karishma,

So from your method, I infer

That minimum of a function will always be at either its critical points or zero.

Await your valued response.


The minimum could also be in an entire range. Take this question for example.

f(x) = |3x + 1| + |2x-3| + |x - 7|

For what value(s) of x will f(x) have the minimum value?




Thank you for your intuitive explanation and clearing the concept for us. So using your analogy of people at every point, shouldn't -1/3 have the minimum value for x (or distance so to speak)?

To be precise, you said 1/4 point has the minimum distance for x or gives the minimum value because of the denominator 4 (my assumption - as you did not state it specifically). This is why we chose 1/4 over 3/2!



f(x) = |3x + 1| + |2x-3| + |x - 7|

f(x) = 3|x + 1/3| + 2|x-3/2| + |x - 7|


-1/3 ------------------ 3/2-----------------------------------7
(3) ...........................(2)...........................................(1)
Say, there are 3 people at -1/3, 2 people at 3/2 and 1 person at 7. They need to meet while covering the least distance. Where should they meet?

Obviously, the person at 7 should travel to 3/2. The distance covered will be 7 - 3/2 = 11/2
Now there are 3 people at -1/3 and 3 people at 3/2. They can meet anywhere between -1/3 and 3/2. The distance covered will be the same in each case.

The point is not whether it is 1/4, the point is the constant outside i.e. how many people need to travel from that point.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 105
Own Kudos [?]: 217 [0]
Given Kudos: 28
Send PM
Re: If f(x)= |4x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| (Question of the Day-II) [#permalink]
In the interval (-1,1/4)
f(x)=-(4x-1)-(x-3)+(x+1)=-4x+1
f(0)=1
However, when I plug in 0 in the original f(x), I get it it to equal 5. f(0)=5. What am I doing wrong?
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14836
Own Kudos [?]: 64986 [0]
Given Kudos: 428
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: If f(x)= |4x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| (Question of the Day-II) [#permalink]
Expert Reply
alphabeta1234 wrote:
In the interval (-1,1/4)
f(x)=-(4x-1)-(x-3)+(x+1)=-4x+1
f(0)=1
However, when I plug in 0 in the original f(x), I get it it to equal 5. f(0)=5. What am I doing wrong?


f(x) = -(4x-1)-(x-3)+(x+1)=-4x+5 (calculation mistake above)
f(0) = 5
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 130
Own Kudos [?]: 298 [0]
Given Kudos: 55
Location: India
GMAT Date: 05-23-2015
GPA: 3.45
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
ficklehead wrote:
I am wondering how can this method be used in questions where there are negative between terms :
Ex: minimum value of : |x+6|-|x-1| ?


You can do it with a negative sign too.
You want to find the minimum value of (distance from -6) - (distance from 1)

Make a number line with -6 and 1 on it.
(-6)..........................(1)

Think of a point in the center of -6 and 1. Its distance from -6 is equal to distance from 1 and hence (distance from -6) - (distance from 1) = 0 .

What if instead, the point x is at -6? Distance from -6 is 0 and distance from 1 is 7 so (distance from -6) - (distance from 1) = 0 - 7 = -7

If you keep moving to the left, (distance from -6) - (distance from 1) will remain -7 so the minimum value is -7.


In the above example, the absolute value function f(x), which is sum of absolute functions, can not be negative for any value of x. Kindly clarify whether the minimum value of f(x) is 7 or -7.

If f(x) = | 1 - x | + | x - 1 |, then minimum value of f(x) is 0 for x = 1. Kindly comment.

Thanks.

Arun.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14836
Own Kudos [?]: 64986 [0]
Given Kudos: 428
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
Expert Reply
arunspanda wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
ficklehead wrote:
I am wondering how can this method be used in questions where there are negative between terms :
Ex: minimum value of : |x+6|-|x-1| ?


You can do it with a negative sign too.
You want to find the minimum value of (distance from -6) - (distance from 1)

Make a number line with -6 and 1 on it.
(-6)..........................(1)

Think of a point in the center of -6 and 1. Its distance from -6 is equal to distance from 1 and hence (distance from -6) - (distance from 1) = 0 .

What if instead, the point x is at -6? Distance from -6 is 0 and distance from 1 is 7 so (distance from -6) - (distance from 1) = 0 - 7 = -7

If you keep moving to the left, (distance from -6) - (distance from 1) will remain -7 so the minimum value is -7.


In the above example, the absolute value function f(x), which is sum of absolute functions, can not be negative for any value of x. Kindly clarify whether the minimum value of f(x) is 7 or -7.

If f(x) = | 1 - x | + | x - 1 |, then minimum value of f(x) is 0 for x = 1. Kindly comment.

Thanks.

Arun.


Sum of two absolute functions cannot be negative but difference can be. The original post discusses the sum of absolute functions.
ficklehead asked about f(x) which is difference between two absolute functions. The '-7' is the minimum value of f(x) in case of difference.

f(x) = |a| - |b| can easily be negative e.g. if a = 2 and b = 5
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14836
Own Kudos [?]: 64986 [2]
Given Kudos: 428
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
ficklehead wrote:
In example : |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| .. the posts on the number line are : -6, -1 , 1 and 3. In order to minimize value of this expression to 9, how to chose the x ?

Please correct me if I am wrong.


x is that point on the number line whose sum of distances from -6, -1, 1 and 3 is minimum. So basically there is a person each at points -6, -1, 1 and 3. You need to make them all meet by covering minimum distance.
Distance between -6 and 3 is 9 which must be covered by these 2 people to meet. These 2 can meet at any point: -6, -1, 0, 1 or 3 etc they will cover a distance of 9 together.
If -1 and 1 have to meet too, they need to cover a distance of 2 together. Say, if person at -1 travels down to 1 and -6 and 3 also meet at 1, the minimum distance covered will be 9+2 = 11 and they will all be able to meet.
If they instead meet at -1, the situation will be the same and total distance covered will be 11 again. In fact, they can meet at any point between -1 and 1, the total distance covered will be 11.

To check, put x = 1. you get |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| = 11
put x = -1, you get |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| = 11
put x = 0, you get |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| = 11

Responding to a pm:
Quote:
Just so am clear the minimum value of f(x) for the below
Try some other combinations. e.g. f(x) = |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6|
f(x) = |2x - 3| + |4x + 7| etc
would be 11 and 13/2 respectively? Am kinda confused over which value x will take.Will it be the total shortest distance covered or the point to which they meet


The 11 and 13/2 that you obtained are the minimum values of the respective functions f(x). This is the total minimum distance covered.
The point at which they meet is the value of x i.e. For first question, whenever x is in this range: -1 <= x <= 1, f(x) will take the value 11.
For second question, when x = -4/7, f(x) will take the minimum value 13/2.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
Math Expert
93007 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne