Last visit was: 27 Apr 2024, 20:37 It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 20:37

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 888 [12]
Given Kudos: 197
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
WE:Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92959
Own Kudos [?]: 619497 [6]
Given Kudos: 81611
Send PM
General Discussion
Tutor
Joined: 05 Apr 2011
Status:Tutor - BrushMyQuant
Posts: 1778
Own Kudos [?]: 2094 [2]
Given Kudos: 100
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Schools: XLRI (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
GPA: 3
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92959
Own Kudos [?]: 619497 [1]
Given Kudos: 81611
Send PM
Re: Is the positive integer P a prime number? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
nktdotgupta wrote:
For Stat1
P can be equal to 2 and can be equal to 9. So not sufficient

For STAT2
P can be equal to 7 and can be equal to 9. So not sufficient

STAT1 and STAT2 together
p-4, p-2,p, p+2, p+4
If P is prime then P must be odd (as only even prime is 2 and p-4 will not be prime then)
if p is odd then p cannot be prime as
p-4,p-2,p,p+2,p+4 make a series of 5 consecutive odd numbers and NO pair of 5 consecutive odd numbers are prime

So, p is NOT a prime number.
So, Answer will be C

Hope it helps!


One little correction. P cannot be 2, since in this case neither P+2 nor P+4 is a prime.
Tutor
Joined: 05 Apr 2011
Status:Tutor - BrushMyQuant
Posts: 1778
Own Kudos [?]: 2094 [0]
Given Kudos: 100
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Schools: XLRI (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
GPA: 3
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Is the positive integer P a prime number? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Thanks Bunuel, Wanted to write 3 :) (edited)
Bunuel wrote:
nktdotgupta wrote:
For Stat1
P can be equal to 2 and can be equal to 9. So not sufficient

For STAT2
P can be equal to 7 and can be equal to 9. So not sufficient

STAT1 and STAT2 together
p-4, p-2,p, p+2, p+4
If P is prime then P must be odd (as only even prime is 2 and p-4 will not be prime then)
if p is odd then p cannot be prime as
p-4,p-2,p,p+2,p+4 make a series of 5 consecutive odd numbers and NO pair of 5 consecutive odd numbers are prime

So, p is NOT a prime number.
So, Answer will be C

Hope it helps!


One little correction. P cannot be 2, since in this case neither P+2 nor P+4 is a prime.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Dec 2019
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Re: Is the positive integer P a prime number? [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Is the positive integer P a prime number?

(1) (P+2) and (P+4) are prime. If p = 1, then the answer is NO but if p = 3, then the answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(2) (P-2) and (P-4) are prime. If p = 9, then the answer is NO but if p = 7, then the answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Since (P-4), (P-2), (P+2), and (P+4) are primes, then all of them must be odd numbers. This means that (P-4), (P-2), P, (P+2), and (P+4) are 5 consecutive odd numbers. Since there are no 5 consecutive odd primes, then P cannot be a prime (out of 5 consecutive odd numbers one must be a multiple of 3 and another a multiple of 5. There are only one prime, which is a multiple of 3, 3 itself and there are only one prime, which is a multiple of 5, 5 itself but P can be neither 3 or 5 since this violate (P-4), (P-2), (P+2), and (P+4) being primes). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.


Hi Bunuel

I understand that the series of (P-4), (P-2), P, (P+2), and (P+4) are 5 consecutive odd numbers, cannot be all odd. So by combination, the answer will be definite NO.

But I couldn't clearly understand the reason behind the numbers 3 and 5 you mentioned. Where does it come from and why just those 2.

Please help.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92959
Own Kudos [?]: 619497 [0]
Given Kudos: 81611
Send PM
Re: Is the positive integer P a prime number? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Anurag06 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is the positive integer P a prime number?

(1) (P+2) and (P+4) are prime. If p = 1, then the answer is NO but if p = 3, then the answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(2) (P-2) and (P-4) are prime. If p = 9, then the answer is NO but if p = 7, then the answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Since (P-4), (P-2), (P+2), and (P+4) are primes, then all of them must be odd numbers. This means that (P-4), (P-2), P, (P+2), and (P+4) are 5 consecutive odd numbers. Since there are no 5 consecutive odd primes, then P cannot be a prime (out of 5 consecutive odd numbers one must be a multiple of 3 and another a multiple of 5. There are only one prime, which is a multiple of 3, 3 itself and there are only one prime, which is a multiple of 5, 5 itself but P can be neither 3 or 5 since this violate (P-4), (P-2), (P+2), and (P+4) being primes). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.


Hi Bunuel

I understand that the series of (P-4), (P-2), P, (P+2), and (P+4) are 5 consecutive odd numbers, cannot be all odd. So by combination, the answer will be definite NO.

But I couldn't clearly understand the reason behind the numbers 3 and 5 you mentioned. Where does it come from and why just those 2.

Please help.


The highlighted part explains why 5 consecutive odd numbers cannot all be primes. Out of 5 consecutive odd numbers, one must be a multiple of 3 and another must be a multiple of 5. So, IF all those 5 odd numbers are primes then one of them must be 3 (a multiple of 3) and another must be 5 (a multiple of 5). But if two of the 5 numbers is 3 and 5, then the remaining numbers cannot all be primes. Thus, not all 5 numbers are primes.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Posts: 8021
Own Kudos [?]: 4099 [0]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1:
545 Q79 V79 DI73
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Is the positive integer P a prime number? [#permalink]
alphonsa wrote:
Is the positive integer P a prime number?

(1) (P+2) and (P+4) are prime
(2) (P-2) and (P-4) are prime


Source: 4Gmat


for condition 1;
(P+2) and (P+4) are prime
P can be 1,3,15 insufficient
from 2
(P-2) and (P-4) are prime
P can be 7,15 ; insufficient
from 1 &2
15 is common ;
IMO C sufficient
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Dec 2019
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Re: Is the positive integer P a prime number? [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Anurag06 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is the positive integer P a prime number?

(1) (P+2) and (P+4) are prime. If p = 1, then the answer is NO but if p = 3, then the answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(2) (P-2) and (P-4) are prime. If p = 9, then the answer is NO but if p = 7, then the answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Since (P-4), (P-2), (P+2), and (P+4) are primes, then all of them must be odd numbers. This means that (P-4), (P-2), P, (P+2), and (P+4) are 5 consecutive odd numbers. Since there are no 5 consecutive odd primes, then P cannot be a prime (out of 5 consecutive odd numbers one must be a multiple of 3 and another a multiple of 5. There are only one prime, which is a multiple of 3, 3 itself and there are only one prime, which is a multiple of 5, 5 itself but P can be neither 3 or 5 since this violate (P-4), (P-2), (P+2), and (P+4) being primes). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.


Hi Bunuel

I understand that the series of (P-4), (P-2), P, (P+2), and (P+4) are 5 consecutive odd numbers, cannot be all odd. So by combination, the answer will be definite NO.

But I couldn't clearly understand the reason behind the numbers 3 and 5 you mentioned. Where does it come from and why just those 2.

Please help.


The highlighted part explains why 5 consecutive odd numbers cannot all be primes. Out of 5 consecutive odd numbers, one must be a multiple of 3 and another must be a multiple of 5. So, IF all those 5 odd numbers are primes then one of them must be 3 (a multiple of 3) and another must be 5 (a multiple of 5). But if two of the 5 numbers is 3 and 5, then the remaining numbers cannot all be primes. Thus, not all 5 numbers are primes.



Thank you Bunuel for answering. Could you please let me know if there is any such property that says out of 5 consecutive numbers, one must be a multiple of 3 and 5 definitely but no other prime integers such as 7.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is the positive integer P a prime number? [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92959 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne