Last visit was: 02 May 2024, 14:12 It is currently 02 May 2024, 14:12

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 505-555 Levelx   Businessx   Short Passagex                     
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42107 [124]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Economist GMAT Tutor Instructor
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 103 [42]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6923
Own Kudos [?]: 63747 [9]
Given Kudos: 1775
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6923
Own Kudos [?]: 63747 [8]
Given Kudos: 1775
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
4
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
imyuva wrote:
Please anyone explain question no.66
i find this question very difficult.

Quote:
66. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about corporate acquisitions?

Quote:
(A) Their known benefits to national economies explain their appeal to individual firms during the 1970s and 1980s.

Even though the deals might have benefits to national economies, the author thinks the deals must be explained by benefits to the executives or their companies, not by benefits to the nation's economy: "the individual acquisitions executives arranging these deals must see them as advancing either their own or their companies’ private economic interests". Eliminate (A).

Quote:
(B) Despite their adverse impact on some firms, they are the best way to channel resources from less to more productive sectors of a nation’s economy.

The passage states that the "acquisitions may well have the desirable effect of channeling a nation’s resources efficiently from less to more efficient sectors of its economy" but does not claim that corporate acquisitions are the BEST way to channel resources. Eliminate (B).

Quote:
(C) They are as likely to occur because of poor monitoring by boards of directors as to be caused by incentive compensation for managers.

The passage mentions incentive compensation for EXECUTIVES as a possible explanation for the acquisitions but not incentive compensation for MANAGERS. Furthermore, the author does not discuss the relative significance the possible factors. In other words, the author does not say whether some factors are more or less common than others. Eliminate (C).

Quote:
(D) They will be less prevalent in the future, since their actual effects will gain wider recognition.

This idea is not mentioned in the passage, so eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring firm help to explain the frequency with which they occur.

The factors cited in the final two sentences are possible explanations for the acquisitions. None of these describe situations that would benefit the firm, so choice (E) is the best answer.

I hope that helps!
General Discussion
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2014
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [1]
Given Kudos: 122
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
1
Kudos
What's considered an acceptable time frame for this passage + set of questions? Should it ideally be completed within 9 minutes? I completed it in 10:06 because I had to stop and think for a few of them. Felt like I was taking longer than I should have. Input would be great. Thanks!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Jan 2014
Posts: 47
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Can anyone explain Q66

I am not getting how to infer the bold part in option E
Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring firm help to explain the frequency with which they occur
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2014
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 278 [9]
Given Kudos: 1474
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
7
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
dream21 wrote:
Can anyone explain Q66

I am not getting how to infer the bold part in option E
Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring firm help to explain the frequency with which they occur


Hey there,

If you look at the last line of para 1 it says "Yet mergers and acquisitions remain common, and bidders continue to assert that their objectives are economic ones" where "common" more or less means "frequent".

Hope this helps!
Current Student
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 360
Own Kudos [?]: 2699 [2]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.7
WE:Marketing (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
1
Kudos
maggie27 wrote:
dream21 wrote:
Can anyone explain Q66

I am not getting how to infer the bold part in option E
Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring firm help to explain the frequency with which they occur


Hey there,

If you look at the last line of para 1 it says "Yet mergers and acquisitions remain common, and bidders continue to assert that their objectives are economic ones" where "common" more or less means "frequent".

Hope this helps!


I had also problems with this question. The statement about the frequency is wrong, because it was not mentioned in the passage, it's just an assumption. But E seems to be the only wright answer compared with other answer choices. As I see, sometimes right answers can be only derived by excluding more wrong answers.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2013
Status:GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: EnterMBA
Posts: 112
Own Kudos [?]: 280 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
GRE 1: Q790 V710
GPA: 3.3
WE:Editorial and Writing (Education)
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
In the second paragraph, the author explicitly says "It seems that factors having little to do with corporate economic interests explain acquisitions."
This statement tells you that factors other than economic interests help explain acquisitions -- a logical inference is that if you know why the acquisitions occur, you can explain the frequency with which they occur with a high degree of accuracy. Hence E.

The first paragraph provides examples of firms initiating acquisitions even when they don't derive economic benefit from them, and says that acquisitions remain common. "Common" in this context seems to mean "frequent", but even this inference is not required; the inference in the above paragraph should suffice.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2013
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
1
Kudos
282552 wrote:
Question 69
Can anybody please help me explain why option C is wrong.
Also is this a 700+ RC..because I got only 3 right in like 12 mins :(
Or I will just accept that I have to work hard on RCs.

D says that most such acquisitions were based on an overestimation of the value of target firms.

Actually this piece of information about overestimation of the value of target firms appears in the second para.

However, the information that we need to look for this question, is limited to the first para, since that is where it is specifically covered what the scenario was in the 70s and 80s.
Director
Director
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 530
Own Kudos [?]: 524 [2]
Given Kudos: 916
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
2
Kudos
IlanaEconomistGMAT wrote:
roopika2990 wrote:
Can anyone explain 67? I did not find any of them right


D would be the correct answer choice here. First, locate the sentence you need to read to answer this question. The impact on national economies is mentioned in the first line of the second paragraph, so we need go no farther then here to find the answer. What does this sentence say about the effect on national companies? That although there may be a positive effect, this is not why such deals were arranged. This implies that some people have considered the positive effect on national economies to be an explanation of all those mergers and acquisitions. Now, notice the bare logical structure of this sentence: X may well be..., but....Y. In other words, Although X, Y. What is X - Acquisitions' impact on national economies. What is Y? The company or personal interest of executives. So what this sentence telling us? That X is not an adequate explanation of mergers and acquisitions, but Y is. This is precisely what answer choice D is telling us: cite and point out the inadequacy of one possible explanation, etc.



this passage is easy but the questions are harder. reading skill is never taught and discussed in rc forum though it is fatally important.

thank you expert, sir
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 33 [2]
Given Kudos: 269
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Hello everyone ....


I have a doubt in question 70, its pretty simple but my concern is the question's phrasing . The questions says" The author of the passage implies..... ?"
Now as far as I know if we have a imply question the answer to that question will not be explicitly mentioned in the passage and that is not case here. Answer choice B is clearly stated.Its like restating the given.

So is my thumb rule for imply questions incorrect ?? or this a strange case.

Please help out !!

Thanks and kudos for solutions !
User avatar
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Status:GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Posts: 252
Own Kudos [?]: 654 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Hi Anurag,

The word IMPLIES (in this question) - is towards the word "Partial Explanation" as the answer choice B (explicitly mentioned in the passage) is only one of the three factors mentioned in the second paragraph.

Since, the choice only referes to one factor that is why "implies that ..possible partial explanation".
Hope it helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2017
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
Can anyone explain question 68 for me? I don't really get it:(

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Jun 2015
Posts: 31
Own Kudos [?]: 30 [4]
Given Kudos: 309
Schools: Sloan '19
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
4
Kudos
kyoshi441994 wrote:
Can anyone explain question 68 for me? I don't really get it:(

Posted from my mobile device


68. According to the passage, during the 1970s and 1980s bidding firms differed from the firms for which they bid in that bidding firms----

In the first paragraph , three study findings are mentioned highlighting the impact of M&A on acquired and acquiring firms .
we need to go back and look for details mentioned about "bidding firm" that is "acquiring firm"-

(A) tended to be more profitable before a merger than after a merger
- not mentioned
(B) were more often concerned about the impact of acquisitions on national economies
- point taken from 2nd paragraph first line . it is generic , not mentioning that bidding firms had this view
(C) were run by managers whose actions were modeled on those of other managers
-not mentioned
(D) anticipated greater economic advantages from prospective mergers
- "anticipated " not discussed anywhere
(E) experienced less of an increase in stock value when a prospective merger was announced
..yes . correct . - finding of study 3.

hope it helps.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 338 [1]
Given Kudos: 95
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT Date: 09-28-2012
WE:Accounting (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
1
Kudos
roopika2990 wrote:
Can anyone explain 67? I did not find any of them right


I got confused between C & D. Picked C, my bad. Now, after analysis, let me write my understanding:-
This is coming from the last line of the 1st para. Bidders continue to assert that their objectives are economic ones. - Thats what they mean by one possible explanation
Then, The second para. Acquisitions may well have the desirable effect of channeling a nation's resources efficiently from less to more efficient sectors of the economy, but the individual acquisition executives arranging these deals must see them as advancing either their own or..... It seems the factors having little to do with corporate economic interests explain explanations.

From the above, C is out because no where non economic factor has been talked about. It was neither cited earlier in the passage.
D talks about one possible explanation - economic interest, inadequacy - little to do.

Now, let me also explain other options:-
A. overlooked - Passage mentions nothing about any explanation being overlooked
B. national economic interests played an important role - The fact that national economic interests might have improved, but this was not the reason for M&A. It was an off result and not a cause of M&A.
E. modeling affected - it does nothing to explain that. Managers did what other managers did. This thing is in no manner related to national economies.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2017
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 37 [0]
Given Kudos: 169
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
Q70:
Since the author mentioned "the manager does what other managers do" -> Managers wished to imitate other managers primarily because they saw how financially beneficial other firms' acquisitions were (exactly the point cited above)
Why the correct answer is B?
Can anyone please explain for me?
Tho i understand B makes sense somehow " These factors may include the incentive compensation of executives, lack of monitoring by boards of directors, and managerial error in estimating the value of firms targeted for acquisition"
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 54
Own Kudos [?]: 55 [0]
Given Kudos: 45
Location: India
GMAT 1: 510 Q46 V17
WE:Web Development (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
Please anyone explain question no.66
i find this question very difficult.
VP
VP
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1158
Own Kudos [?]: 1018 [2]
Given Kudos: 3851
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
2
Kudos
BrainLab wrote:
maggie27 wrote:
dream21 wrote:
Can anyone explain Q66

I am not getting how to infer the bold part in option E
Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring firm help to explain the frequency with which they occur


Hey there,

If you look at the last line of para 1 it says "Yet mergers and acquisitions remain common, and bidders continue to assert that their objectives are economic ones" where "common" more or less means "frequent".

Hope this helps!


I had also problems with this question. The statement about the frequency is wrong, because it was not mentioned in the passage, it's just an assumption. But E seems to be the only wright answer compared with other answer choices. As I see, sometimes right answers can be only derived by excluding more wrong answers.



In the second paragragraph is sentence " It seems that factors having little to do with corporate economic interests explain acquisitions. " Hence E :)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2017
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 25
Send PM
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
I can eliminate other answers to choose C but I can not understand why C is true. Are "professed goals" = level of profitability? Is it common knowledge?

Quote:
"65. The findings cited in the passage suggest which of the following about the outcomes of corporate mergers and acquisitions with respect to acquiring firms?

(A) They include a decrease in value of many acquiring firms??? stocks.
(B) They tend to be more beneficial for small firms than for large firms.
(C) They do not fulfill the professed goals of most acquiring firms.
(D) They tend to be beneficial to such firms in the long term even though apparently detrimental in the short term.
(E) They discourage many such firms from attempting to make subsequent bids and acquisitions."
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du [#permalink]
 1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13982 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne