Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 12:23 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 12:23

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92948
Own Kudos [?]: 619224 [16]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14831
Own Kudos [?]: 64939 [7]
Given Kudos: 427
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2013
Posts: 267
Own Kudos [?]: 167 [0]
Given Kudos: 201
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GRE 1: Q163 V155
GPA: 3.95
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Posts: 8020
Own Kudos [?]: 4098 [1]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1:
545 Q79 V79 DI73
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over the interpre [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bunuel wrote:
Two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over the interpretation of certain footprints that were left among other footprints in hardened volcanic ash at site G. Dr. Tyson claims they are clearly early hominid footprints since they show human characteristics: a squarish heel and a big toe immediately adjacent to the next toe. However, since the footprints indicate that if hominids made those prints they would have had to walk in an unexpected cross-stepping manner, by placing the left foot to the right of the right foot. Dr. Rees rejects Dr. Tyson’s conclusion.

The disagreement between the two paleontologists is over which one of the following?


(A) the relative significance of various aspects of the evidence
(B) the assumption that early hominid footprints are distinguishable from other footprints
(C) the possibility of using the evidence of footprints to determine the gait of the creature that made those footprints
(D) the assumption that evidence from one paleontologic site is enough to support a conclusion
(E) the likelihood that early hominids would have walked upright on two feet


IMO D: the assumption that evidence from one paleontologic site is enough to support a conclusion
there is only 1 point of assumption done to conclude in the argument
"early hominid footprints since they show human characteristics: a squarish heel and a big toe immediately adjacent to the next toe"
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2013
Posts: 267
Own Kudos [?]: 167 [0]
Given Kudos: 201
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GRE 1: Q163 V155
GPA: 3.95
Send PM
Re: Two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over the interpre [#permalink]
So I have posted my understanding of the argument and my answer is wrong.

Please post your analysis
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2013
Posts: 267
Own Kudos [?]: 167 [0]
Given Kudos: 201
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GRE 1: Q163 V155
GPA: 3.95
Send PM
Two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over the interpre [#permalink]
Thank you VeritasKarishma ma'am for your response..
I attempted this question yesterday and marked D. However, before reading your analysis today, i marked A as my answer choice and my reasoning somehow mimicked yours..

Does this happen with other gmat aspirants?
How to correct this issue?

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2018
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 337
Send PM
Two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over the interpre [#permalink]
There are two evidences given
1. The footprint resembles that of hominids
2. The left foot is at the right of right foot

So Dr. T is focusing on 1 but Dr. R is focusing on 2

They both disagree that - which evidence (1 or 2) to give priority to.

Hence A makes sense

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Oct 2023
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
GRE 1: Q169 V166
GPA: 8
Send PM
Re: Two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over the interpre [#permalink]
Is this question relevant to GMAT? Can we expect such questions?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over the interpre [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne