Foi2Evei2 wrote:
Hi experts,
AjiteshArun GMATNinja MartyTargetTestPrep AndrewNI have the problem to get the meaning sense that (I) Turtles can endure long fasts "BECAUSE" (II) Turtles are able to survive on weekly or monthly feedings.
For me, it seems to be (II) because (I). Does it make sense? If not, how I could improve my meaning analysis?
Hello,
Foi2Evei2. In all honesty, I think this is a type of sentence that could operate in either direction: I/II or II/I. Could a sentence aim to convey
why turtles can endure long fasts? Sure. That would be a I/II structure. Could it be that a sentence would aim to explain
why turtles can survive on sparse feedings, a II/I structure? That could work as well. But notice that the decision is made for us, vis-à-vis the answer choices. The latter three options adopt a I/II structure—the lack of a comma after "fasts" in (D) and (E) cues us that the
because clause is commenting on or explaining the main clause. (The first two options are a garbled mess.)
Quote:
Turtles, like other reptiles, can endure long fasts, in their ability to survive on weekly or even monthly feedings; however, when food is readily available, they may eat frequently and grow very fat.
(A) fasts, in their ability to survive
(B) fasts, having their ability to survive
(C) fasts, due to having the ability of surviving
(D) fasts because they are able to survive
(E) fasts because of having the ability of surviving
With this in mind, our task is merely to select the safest, most concise, and idiomatic way of expressing that turtles can endure long fasts
for some reason. Only answer choice (D) holds up on all fronts, as many have commented above. In short, you may not have to delve into meaning too much if the key decision point has already been made for you.
I hope that helps resolve your doubts. Thank you for thinking to ask.
- Andrew