OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)
THE PROMPTQuote:
While usually unnoticeable, pollen is essentially ubiquitous in terrestrial habitats and is, in fact, durable enough that scientists can examine fossilized pollen grains in ancient sediments to identify what plants they grew during prehistoric times.
• ENOUGH
→
enough is used to describe sufficiency whereas
so that is used for causality
→ The use of
durable enough to show causality is inappropriate.
So that is a better construction for that purpose.
Enough should be used to show sufficiency instead.
→ Idiom:
for identifying is not idiomatic.
To identify is idiomatic.
→ Idiom
So X that Y is correct to show causality.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) durable enough that scientists can examine fossilized pollen grains in ancient sediments to identify what plants they grew during prehistoric times
• the case of the Missing Antecedent
→ to what does
they refer? Answer: nothing or nonsense.
The noun
scientists cannot be the antecedent for
they.
The scientists were not growing plants in prehistoric times. No other people are mentioned.
•
enough is for sufficiency whereas
so that is for causality
→ The use of
durable enough to show causality is inappropriate.
ELIMINATE A
Quote:
B) durable enough for scientists to examine fossilized pollen grains in ancient sediments for identifying what plants grew during prehistoric times
• durable enough should be used to describe sufficiency, not causality
• IDIOM -- for identifying should be
to identifyELIMINATE B
Quote:
C) so durable as to let scientists examine fossilized pollen grains of ancient sediments to identify what plants they grew during prehistoric times
• the missing antecedent
→ Just as is the case in option A,
they has no referent. The scientists were not growing things in prehistoric time
• idiom: So X as to Y can be used in this context, although GMAC has waffled on this idiomatic structure.
→
So X as to Y is used to emphasize that some intense or strong quality
has a consequence. → A new question in
OG 2020 tests this idiom. See
OG 2020, SC # 791, which you can find
HEREELIMINATE C
Quote:
D) so durable that scientists can examine fossilized pollen grains in ancient sediments to identify what plants grew during prehistoric times
• I do not see any errors
•
so that (or So X that Y) seems to be GMAC's preference to show causality.
KEEP
Quote:
E) so durable that scientists who examine fossilized pollen grains from ancient sediments and, as a result, identify what plants grew during prehistoric times
• the case of the Missing Verb-- we have a fragment
→ The insertion of
who deprives the main clause of a verb.
Relative pronouns must be paired with a verb. In this case,
who "eats up" the verb "examine."
Now the main clause has no verb, and we have a fragment.
ELIMINATE E
The answer is D.COMMENTSmlakshmi84 , yet again, welcome to SC Butler.
I am glad to see a couple of people whom I have not seen for awhile.
These answers range from very good to excellent.
TarunKumar1234 ,I am bumping you to Best Community Reply.
Keep up the good work, everyone.