Last visit was: 03 Jun 2024, 13:18 It is currently 03 Jun 2024, 13:18
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93473
Own Kudos [?]: 628901 [11]
Given Kudos: 82085
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93473
Own Kudos [?]: 628901 [3]
Given Kudos: 82085
Send PM
General Discussion
Fuqua Moderator
Joined: 21 Jul 2021
Posts: 232
Own Kudos [?]: 173 [2]
Given Kudos: 56
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2021
Posts: 94
Own Kudos [?]: 145 [2]
Given Kudos: 75
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club World Cup 2022 (DAY 2): HiScience is planning to use 9% of [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Answer is C
(A) Build-It Inc and WeConstruct are not the only companies who are competing for this contract. Out of scope

(B) HiScience has a long history with Build-It Inc and WeConstruct and has relied on them extensively for past projects.
Irrelevant
(C) Build-It Inc will not complete any currently open contracts worth at least 4% of HiScience’s total construction budget before HiScience awards the contract. Build-It cannot finish at least 4% to make it under 50%. Correct

(D) Only those companies with whom HiScience has had a prior relationship were allowed to submit bids for this construction contract. No mentioning of this

(E) WeConstruct has done previous work on this scale in the municipality where this new office will be located and is familiar with the legal requirements for construction work in that municipality. Irrelevant
LBS Moderator
Joined: 25 Apr 2020
Posts: 142
Own Kudos [?]: 129 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Location: India
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club World Cup 2022 (DAY 2): HiScience is planning to use 9% of [#permalink]
1
Kudos
This is a very interesting question. Also thinking critically, we have to do a few mathematical calculations.

Let's start with the calculation first: "no single company can have simultaneous open contracts with a total value that is more than half of HiScience’s total construction budget. Build-It Inc already holds contracts comprising 44% of HiScience’s construction budget",

and the new project is of 9% valuation. It means if Build-It Inc gets this project, it will have open projects worth 53% of the total project value. As per the question, we have to ensure till the project is allocated to someone else, Build-It Inc should not complete the previous project worth 4% or more. If Build-It Inc completes any project of more than 4% valuation, they can apply for this 9%.

(A) Build-It Inc and WeConstruct are not the only companies who are competing for this contract: Ok but is this information help us to clarify whether Build-It Inc can complete any open contract before HiScience awards the contract? No. Eliminate this option.

(B) HiScience has a long history with Build-It Inc and WeConstruct and has relied on them extensively for past projects: Ok but again same issue as option A. Eliminate

(C) Build-It Inc will not complete any currently open contracts worth at least 4% of HiScience’s total construction budget before HiScience awards the contract: Is this option answers our question? Bingo. If Build-It Inc completes any currently open contracts worth at least 4%, they will be eligible to reapply as per the company policy because they will have less than 50% even if they receive a 9% contract. Hold this option and check for other.

(D) Only those companies with whom HiScience has had a prior relationship were allowed to submit bids for this construction contract: Out of context. Eliminate

(E) WeConstruct has done previous work on this scale in the municipality where this new office will be located and is familiar with the legal requirements for construction work in that municipality: Out of context. Eliminate

Option C is a clear winner.
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Posts: 3130
Own Kudos [?]: 4572 [1]
Given Kudos: 1857
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club World Cup 2022 (DAY 2): HiScience is planning to use 9% of [#permalink]
1
Kudos
The conclusion of the argument is "this project will need to be awarded to WeConstruct"

(A) Build-It Inc and WeConstruct are not the only companies who are competing for this contract.

This need not be the assumption, there is a possibility that there are other competitors, however the HiScience can favor WeConstruct

(B) HiScience has a long history with Build-It Inc and WeConstruct and has relied on them extensively for past projects.

This could be a strengthener as the option tells us why HiScience may favor WeConstruct, however this is not an assumption.

(C) Build-It Inc will not complete any currently open contracts worth at least 4% of HiScience’s total construction budget before HiScience awards the contract.

This option is a pretty strong contender given the argument in the passage. We know as per the new policy "no single company can have simultaneous open contracts with a total value that is more than half of HiScience’s total construction budget.", hence if Build-It will not complete any any currently open contracts worth at least 4% then WeConstruct is the only option as per the argument. Will keep this.

(D) Only those companies with whom HiScience has had a prior relationship were allowed to submit bids for this construction contract.

Again, pretty irrelevant option. First we dont know if WeConstruct has any prior relationship with HiScience. This is out of scope

(E) WeConstruct has done previous work on this scale in the municipality where this new office will be located and is familiar with the legal requirements for construction work in that municipality.

The argument is centered around which company will get the project. Irrelevant to our argument.

IMO C
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Nov 2018
Posts: 139
Own Kudos [?]: 149 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club World Cup 2022 (DAY 2): HiScience is planning to use 9% of [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Premise/General fact : HiScience is planning to use 9% of its total construction budget to build a new research facility.

Conclusion: Although HiScience typically contracts with Build-It Inc on projects of this size, this project will need to be awarded to WeConstruct.

Support for conclusion: A new HiScience policy states that no single company can have simultaneous open contracts with a total value that is more than half of HiScience’s total construction budget. Build-It Inc already holds contracts comprising 44% of HiScience’s construction budget.

Which of the following is an assumption required in order to conclude that WeConstruct will be awarded the contract?


Here is the crux of the argument -

The project [to build a new research facility] will go to We construct and not to Build-It Inc.

Reason: A policy states that no single company can have simultaneous open contracts with a total value that is more than half of HiScience’s total construction budget. Build-It Inc. already has 44% of open contract and by giving this new project to Build-It Inc. the policy will be violated.

So how can this project go to we construct ??

possibility 1: The open projects (of at least 4% of the total budget) of Build-It Inc. do not complete before the new project is awarded.
possibility 2: The new policy is not scraped before the project is awarded.
possibility 3: Before the project is awarded, no changes in the policy is made that is in favour of Build-It Inc. getting this new project.

Now we can look at the options !!

(A) Build-It Inc and WeConstruct are not the only companies who are competing for this contract. (does not make it likely that we construct will have the project)

(B) HiScience has a long history with Build-It Inc and WeConstruct and has relied on them extensively for past projects. (tangential to the argument)

(C) Build-It Inc will not complete any currently open contracts worth at least 4% of HiScience’s total construction budget before HiScience awards the contract. (Voila. If Build-It Inc completes these projects then it makes it doubtful that WeConstruct will get the project)

(D) Only those companies with whom HiScience has had a prior relationship were allowed to submit bids for this construction contract. (does not make it more likely that we construct will have the project)

(E) WeConstruct has done previous work on this scale in the municipality where this new office will be located and is familiar with the legal requirements for construction work in that municipality. (does nothing to make it likely that weconstruct will get the project)

IMO Option C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2019
Posts: 313
Own Kudos [?]: 973 [1]
Given Kudos: 655
Location: Uzbekistan
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club World Cup 2022 (DAY 2): HiScience is planning to use 9% of [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Conclusion: Although HiScience (A) typically contracts with Build-It Inc on projects of this size, this project will NEED TO BE AWARDED TO WeConstruct (B).

Reason: no single company can have SIMULTANEOUS open contracts with a total value that is more than half of HiScience’s total construction budget.

The author comes to the conclusion that a company other than A should be awarded with the contract. The main word in his argument is SIMULTANEOUS; he assumes that if company A gets the new project, it will SIMULTANEOUSLY hold more than 50% of the construction budget. However, what if A completes more than 3% of the contract before the new project is awarded and thus will not hold more than 50% of the budget? Only C choice tackles this issue.


(A) Build-It Inc and WeConstruct are not the only companies who are competing for this contract.

The negation technique shows that even if the opposite of this choice is true, the conclusion of the author holds.

(B) HiScience has a long history with Build-It Inc and WeConstruct and has relied on them extensively for past projects.

The negation technique shows that even if the opposite of this choice is true, the conclusion of the author holds.

(C) Build-It Inc will not complete any currently open contracts worth at least 4% of HiScience’s total construction budget before HiScience awards the contract.

Correct answer because the negation of this choice undermines the conclusion.

(D) Only those companies with whom HiScience has had a prior relationship were allowed to submit bids for this construction contract.

The negation technique shows that even if the opposite of this choice is true, the conclusion of the author holds.

(E) WeConstruct has done previous work on this scale in the municipality where this new office will be located and is familiar with the legal requirements for construction work in that municipality.

The negation technique shows that even if the opposite of this choice is true, the conclusion of the author holds.


So C
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93473
Own Kudos [?]: 628901 [0]
Given Kudos: 82085
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club World Cup 2022 (DAY 2): HiScience is planning to use 9% of [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
HiScience is planning to use 9% of its total construction budget to build a new research facility. Although HiScience typically contracts with Build-It Inc on projects of this size, this project will need to be awarded to WeConstruct. A new HiScience policy states that no single company can have simultaneous open contracts with a total value that is more than half of HiScience’s total construction budget. Build-It Inc already holds contracts comprising 44% of HiScience’s construction budget.

Which of the following is an assumption required in order to conclude that WeConstruct will be awarded the contract?


(A) Build-It Inc and WeConstruct are not the only companies who are competing for this contract.

(B) HiScience has a long history with Build-It Inc and WeConstruct and has relied on them extensively for past projects.

(C) Build-It Inc will not complete any currently open contracts worth at least 4% of HiScience’s total construction budget before HiScience awards the contract.

(D) Only those companies with whom HiScience has had a prior relationship were allowed to submit bids for this construction contract.

(E) WeConstruct has done previous work on this scale in the municipality where this new office will be located and is familiar with the legal requirements for construction work in that municipality.


 


This question is by Manhattan Prep for the GMAT Club World Cup Competition

Compete, Get Better, Win prizes and more

 



Official Explanation is pinned as BEST Reply HERE.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: GMAT Club World Cup 2022 (DAY 2): HiScience is planning to use 9% of [#permalink]