VishalDamarla wrote:
Sajjad1994 wrote:
[textarea]Official Explanation
Between the end of 2003 and the end of 2007 the stock of Quadruped appreciated from $15.50 to $18.25. This is a 17.74% increase. The stock of Tetrapod went from $11.50 to $13.25, for a 15.22% increase. Finally, the stock of FourFeet went from $10.75 to$12.50, for a $10.75 to $12.50 increase. Thus, the correct answer is choice (A).
The correct answer is (A).
For
I have assumed the stock of Fourfeet went from $10.5 to $12.5 which is a 19% increase which is greater than the percent increase of the stock of Quadruped.
Consequently, I have marked Fourfeet for the first drop-down question.
Now, my question is how can I assume numbers so accurately in the limited time of 2:17 min per DI question?
TIA
Hi,
You are correct with your observation.
I too would take the Fourfeet to be close to $2, as the 2003 mark is almost the same distance below 11$ as 2007 mark is above 12$. Thus, 10.50 to 12.50 is a reasonable inference.
I will try to improve the question for it to be more clear to be answered or archive it.