bostonsparky wrote:
I personally have never heard of anyone who got into HBS not getting into the vast majority of their other schools. For example, HBS's yield rate is 89%, vs Sloan's which is 66%. I'll venture that a good chunk of that 34% of those accepted into Sloan but didn't matriculate have turned it down for HBS.
Some other notable yield rates (all from BW):
Columbia: 77%
Ross: 70%
Wharton: 67%
Kellogg: 57%
Stern: 57%
Haas: 53%
Therefore my take is that there's definitely a big overlap, as Sloan, Stern, Haas and Kellogg(arguably) all have to deal with a higher-ranked behemoth in their immediate vicinity, and have their yield rates notably affected by it. Ross on the other hand is (barely) ranked below at least 3 of those schools by many people yet has a much higher yield rate. That's gotta have something to do with having less 'overlapping' applicants than these other schools.
I disagree with a couple of points made in your post. Every year, there are many people who get into HBS or Stanford and get dinged at Wharton or Kellogg. This is due to the age factor and demographics of each school. If you are applying with 0-3 years of work experience, you have a far better shot at getting into HBS or Stanford than you do getting into Kellogg.
Lastly, I do not believe that the location of Ross has anything to do with the yield. I really don't believe that most top MBAs are thrilled about being in the state of Michigan. I would just assume that Ross students are a self-selecting bunch. Out of the state schools within the top 15 - UCLA/Haas attract California-oriented people, Darden attracts people for its rigorous curriculum and it's ties to the South. If you are actually willing to spend 2 years in the state of Michigan to attend a state school - chances are that you know exactly why you want to be there and the program is a great fit for you.