Last visit was: 15 Jun 2024, 11:02 It is currently 15 Jun 2024, 11:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93716
Own Kudos [?]: 631979 [12]
Given Kudos: 82303
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Dec 2020
Posts: 455
Own Kudos [?]: 384 [2]
Given Kudos: 360
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2023
Posts: 248
Own Kudos [?]: 95 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Jun 2023
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Political Activist: Without term limits, legislative bodies can become [#permalink]
IMO The correct answer is B because if the ideas of the younger politicians were not effective, there would not be a need to give positions to the older ones

Posted from my mobile device
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93716
Own Kudos [?]: 631979 [0]
Given Kudos: 82303
Send PM
Re: Political Activist: Without term limits, legislative bodies can become [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
Political Activist: Without term limits, legislative bodies can become overrun with policymakers who are substantially older than the majority of their constituency, and young politicians with fresh ideas are discouraged from bringing those ideas and talents into public service. For these reasons, no office in our country should allow a person to serve more than two consecutive terms.

Which of the following is an assumption required by the argument above?

A. It is not possible for a policymaker to effectively govern a constituency that is substantially younger.
B. Younger politicians’ ideas are, on average, more effective than older politicians’ ideas.
C. In the absence of term limits, at least some elected officials would serve more than two consecutive terms.
D. There are at least as many highly-qualified young politicians as there are elected officials who are serving their second terms.
E. It is in a country’s best interest to encourage political participation among younger voters.​​​


This is a CR Butler Question





VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:



In this assumption question, it is important to understand the parameters of the argument. The activist wants to implement term limits because, without them, older politicians CAN monopolize the seats within a legislative body, and young politicians with fresh ideas are discouraged from trying to join. Note that nowhere in this argument do you know that older politicians ARE currently dominating the legislature, nor do you find evidence that the government is not functioning well or representing its constituents adequately.

For this reason, choice A is incorrect. If you use the Assumption Negation Technique to negate it, you then have:

It IS possible for a policymaker to effectively govern a constituency that is substantially younger.

This is irrelevant to the argument as given: the argument doesn't infer any challenges in effective representation at all, so this negated assumption does not directly challenge the argument.

Choice B is also incorrect. Negated through A.N.T. it reads:

Younger politicians’ ideas are NOT, on average, more effective than older politicians’ ideas.

Again, the argument does not deal with the effectiveness of the politicians' ideas, but rather just expresses regret that new (not necessarily "better") ideas are being left out.

Choice C is correct, and when it is negated you should see why. Negated it reads:

In the absence of term limits, NO elected officials would serve more than two consecutive terms. (note, the logical opposite of "at least some" is "none")

This points out that there is no problem whatsoever - no one is staying more than two consecutive terms, so the proposed term limits would have zero effect! Of course, this is why Assumption Negation is so powerful - it tells you when a premise is necessary by forcing you to consider how the argument would look without that premise. And without any politicians sticking around past two terms, there would be no need to limit them to two.

Choice D is also unnecessary. Negated it reads "There are NOT at least as many highly-qualified young politicians as there are elected officials in their second terms." But note that highly-qualified isn't integral to the argument: you don't know that anyone currently serving is highly-qualified, so why would it matter if the replacements are?

And choice E is also incorrect. Even if it is not in a nation's interests to encourage participation among younger voters, the same problems the activist seeks to solve (losing out on new ideas, etc.) can still apply. The correct answer is C.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Political Activist: Without term limits, legislative bodies can become [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6953 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
821 posts