NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 17:24 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 17:24
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
imhimanshu
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 5230 [55]
Given Kudos: 136
Send PM
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans [#permalink] New post   27 Dec 2012, 06:37
9
Kudos
46
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (02:13) correct 43% (02:33) wrong based on 1530 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?


(A) In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.

(B) some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.

(C) though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.

(D) many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.

(E) polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
A
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
L
KarishmaB
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14831
Own Kudos [?]: 64940 [15]
Given Kudos: 427
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans [#permalink] New post   27 Dec 2012, 22:58
5
Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
imhimanshu wrote:
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

Request you to please share your reasoning.


Question Stem: The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

It is a strengthen question. You need to look for the option that strengthens the conclusion of the argument.

What is the conclusion?

Conclusion: "This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts"
Any tax, simple or complicated, will require an enforcement and collection agency so costs will not go down.

What will strengthen this conclusion?
Something that says that any kind of tax will have similar agency costs.

Look at the options:

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.

If the size of the tax collection agency stays the same, chances are that the cost will stay the same too. Hence, the cost may not depend on the complexity of the tax code. It does strengthen the argument. Answer.

B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.

Irrelevant to the argument how the flat tax is calculated.

C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.

Again, irrelevant. We need to figure out whether simplified tax laws will reduce cost.

D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.

Irrelevant to the argument. The structure of flat tax doesn't concern us.

E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

Irrelevant. It doesn't matter how voters feel.
General Discussion
avatar
pritish2301
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans [#permalink] New post   27 Dec 2012, 09:29
1
Kudos
hi Himanshu,

The question is asking for...
The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

The conclusion of the argument is..."no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts."

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
This is going against the argument saying there is no relation between collection agency and complexity.
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
Clearly Irrelevant
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
Out of scope since it is clear that the argument agrees that Flat tax will be simple. Alternative tax proposals out of scope
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
Weakens the argument
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals
Could be the answer

Waiting for expert opinion. Let us see what others have to say!
avatar
govols
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: Anderson '15 (D) McCombs '15 (WL) Thunderbird '15 (A) Marshall '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 750 Q45 V49
GPA: 3.92
WE:Education (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans [#permalink] New post   27 Dec 2012, 11:46
1
Kudos
imhimanshu wrote:
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

Request you to please share your reasoning.


A. The main argument here is that the flat tax won't save any money because you still need a way to enforce it. A is the only answer that directly addresses the argument and shows that there would be little to no savings involved in a flat tax system.
User avatar
G
Nevernevergiveup
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 2755 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans [#permalink] New post   15 Jul 2016, 11:46
1
Bookmarks
Argument in simple terms

1. Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save moneythrough the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes.

2. Argument says that suggestion is ridiculous or stupid.

Reason: Since any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency.

Analysis: Irrespective of complexity of tax laws, still collection agency is required and as per the argument usage of this fact to counter claim of cost savings indicate that possibly costs cannot be saved even if we go with Flat tax proposal.

It would definitely seem useless to invest in something(to follow new regulation) which serves no purpose right.
So major amount of regular costs regarding taxes may exist with agency and not with laws.
We need to find whether there is a change in agency costs w.r.t complexity of tax code.
Since if it agency costs reduce with complexity then conclusion is weakened. So we need to ensure the removal of any such possibility.



Strengthen question

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.

This is inline with our reasoning above. Let Karishma words help us.................

If the size of the tax collection agency stays the same, chances are that the cost will stay the same too. Hence, the cost may not depend on the complexity of the tax code. It does strengthen the argument.

B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.

This focus on the flat tax calculation........are we bothered by collection method and
also notice the danger word some...........what if the number behind this some advocates is really small or almost negligible. We cannot consider this option important anyway.

C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.

Again some word ruins it. What if this complexity is harmless?

D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.

OFS. After procedures of cost savings is not our point of concern.

E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

OFS. It doesn't matter how voters feel.

I struggled a lot because of this question and could not decipher it still after going through two expert replies. If this post helps someone please add kudos to notify the same. Do not give up for its smart word play. :idea: :)
avatar
B
Mahamudul608
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Marketing, Sustainability
GPA: 3.89
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans [#permalink] New post   20 Jul 2017, 11:20
Why C is out of scope? Some flat tax s are complex so these will require more apparatus. More explanation on A please.
User avatar
L
XavierAlexander
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Aug 2015
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 386 [0]
Given Kudos: 5542
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans [#permalink] New post   28 Jul 2017, 08:53

I'll try to help with the analysis of this question and why option A is right.



Conclusion - This idea that "Flat Tax" will save money, as tax collection dept. would not be needed anymore, is NOT right.
Premise - Because any form of tax needs tax collection dept. so that people have fear of law and pay taxes


Restatement of correct option A in simpler words::

A. Based on history, there is no relation b\w varieties of tax and the size of the tax collection dept. In other words, in past, even when the tax is simplified or complicated, there had not been any change in the size of tax collection dept. size.

So this statement is a strengthener as it is saying that even with the simplifying form of tax, "Flat Tax", we should not eliminate tax collection dept.


Restatement of incorrect option C in simpler words::

C. Other forms of tax, such as "Flat Tax", actually increase complexities.

So this statement is a out of scope because conclusion is NOT concerned about tax complexity. Rather conclusion is dependent on the facts whether removal of tax collection department is correct, and whether the removal of dept., in case it's right, will save money.

imhimanshu wrote:
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

Request you to please share your reasoning.
User avatar
P
Helium
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 459
Own Kudos [?]: 765 [0]
Given Kudos: 118
Location: France
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE:Consulting (Other)
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans [#permalink] New post   10 Sep 2018, 18:49
This argument lacks a connection between the idea of simplifying the tax code and a reduction in the complexity of the agency required to implement it. While this seems like a reasonable assumption, it is an assumption nonetheless and therefore vulnerable to criticism. Answer choice A suggests that there is little relationship between tax code complexity and collection agency size, exactly fitting this assumption. A is therefore the correct answer. Answer choices B and E are out of scope with information that is peripheral to this assumption. Answer choice C might imply that some flat tax proposals require larger collection apparatus than others, but the fundamental connection between tax complexity and collection agency size remains missing so this answer is not correct. Answer choice D brings up a criticism that could be used against a flat tax law if the argument was proved incorrect, but does not itself prove the argument incorrect.
User avatar
P
Crytiocanalyst
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 994
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 309
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans [#permalink] New post   21 Oct 2021, 00:01
imhimanshu wrote:
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true? .



(A) In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
THis definitely strengthens as framework of collection and implementation was creating complexity which is eleminated with the given argument therefore let us hang on to it

(B) some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
This is thoroughly out of context and doesn't have any impact therefore out

(C) though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
Some complexity is part of the new proposal as they only propose to eleminate most and not all therefore out

(D) many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
Similar reasoning as B

(E) polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals
we have no clue as of why the people are skeptical as the reasons can be plenty and these reasons may not be associated with complexity therefore out

Therefore IMO A
User avatar
VerbalBot
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17226
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans [#permalink] New post   20 Jan 2024, 03:16
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans [#permalink]
20 Jan 2024, 03:16
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
mysterymanrog
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions