GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Jun 2019, 13:11

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 254
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans  [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Dec 2012, 06:37
6
19
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (02:09) correct 41% (02:29) wrong based on 918 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

(A) In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.

(B) some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.

(C) though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.

(D) many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.

(E) polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9340
Location: Pune, India
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans  [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Dec 2012, 22:58
4
5
imhimanshu wrote:
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

Question Stem: The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

It is a strengthen question. You need to look for the option that strengthens the conclusion of the argument.

What is the conclusion?

Conclusion: "This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts"
Any tax, simple or complicated, will require an enforcement and collection agency so costs will not go down.

What will strengthen this conclusion?
Something that says that any kind of tax will have similar agency costs.

Look at the options:

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.

If the size of the tax collection agency stays the same, chances are that the cost will stay the same too. Hence, the cost may not depend on the complexity of the tax code. It does strengthen the argument. Answer.

B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.

Irrelevant to the argument how the flat tax is calculated.

C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.

Again, irrelevant. We need to figure out whether simplified tax laws will reduce cost.

D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.

Irrelevant to the argument. The structure of flat tax doesn't concern us.

E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

Irrelevant. It doesn't matter how voters feel.
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 30
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans  [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Dec 2012, 09:29
hi Himanshu,

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

The conclusion of the argument is..."no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts."

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
This is going against the argument saying there is no relation between collection agency and complexity.
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
Clearly Irrelevant
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
Out of scope since it is clear that the argument agrees that Flat tax will be simple. Alternative tax proposals out of scope
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
Weakens the argument
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

Waiting for expert opinion. Let us see what others have to say!
Intern
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 19
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q45 V49
GPA: 3.92
WE: Education (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans  [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Dec 2012, 11:46
imhimanshu wrote:
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

A. The main argument here is that the flat tax won't save any money because you still need a way to enforce it. A is the only answer that directly addresses the argument and shows that there would be little to no savings involved in a flat tax system.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1102
Location: India
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans  [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jul 2016, 11:46
Argument in simple terms

1. Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save moneythrough the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes.

2. Argument says that suggestion is ridiculous or stupid.

Reason: Since any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency.

Analysis: Irrespective of complexity of tax laws, still collection agency is required and as per the argument usage of this fact to counter claim of cost savings indicate that possibly costs cannot be saved even if we go with Flat tax proposal.

It would definitely seem useless to invest in something(to follow new regulation) which serves no purpose right.
So major amount of regular costs regarding taxes may exist with agency and not with laws.
We need to find whether there is a change in agency costs w.r.t complexity of tax code.
Since if it agency costs reduce with complexity then conclusion is weakened. So we need to ensure the removal of any such possibility.

Strengthen question

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.

This is inline with our reasoning above. Let Karishma words help us.................

If the size of the tax collection agency stays the same, chances are that the cost will stay the same too. Hence, the cost may not depend on the complexity of the tax code. It does strengthen the argument.

B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.

This focus on the flat tax calculation........are we bothered by collection method and
also notice the danger word some...........what if the number behind this some advocates is really small or almost negligible. We cannot consider this option important anyway.

C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.

Again some word ruins it. What if this complexity is harmless?

D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.

OFS. After procedures of cost savings is not our point of concern.

E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

OFS. It doesn't matter how voters feel.

I struggled a lot because of this question and could not decipher it still after going through two expert replies. If this post helps someone please add kudos to notify the same. Do not give up for its smart word play.
Intern
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Posts: 8
Concentration: Marketing, Sustainability
GPA: 3.89
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans  [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jul 2017, 11:20
Why C is out of scope? Some flat tax s are complex so these will require more apparatus. More explanation on A please.
Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2015
Posts: 51
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans  [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jul 2017, 08:53

I'll try to help with the analysis of this question and why option A is right.

Conclusion - This idea that "Flat Tax" will save money, as tax collection dept. would not be needed anymore, is NOT right.
Premise - Because any form of tax needs tax collection dept. so that people have fear of law and pay taxes

Restatement of correct option A in simpler words::

A. Based on history, there is no relation b\w varieties of tax and the size of the tax collection dept. In other words, in past, even when the tax is simplified or complicated, there had not been any change in the size of tax collection dept. size.

So this statement is a strengthener as it is saying that even with the simplifying form of tax, "Flat Tax", we should not eliminate tax collection dept.

Restatement of incorrect option C in simpler words::

C. Other forms of tax, such as "Flat Tax", actually increase complexities.

So this statement is a out of scope because conclusion is NOT concerned about tax complexity. Rather conclusion is dependent on the facts whether removal of tax collection department is correct, and whether the removal of dept., in case it's right, will save money.

imhimanshu wrote:
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

_________________
** When even your best effort fails, do you back down from chasing your dreams ??? **
Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 558
Location: France
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans  [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Sep 2018, 18:49
This argument lacks a connection between the idea of simplifying the tax code and a reduction in the complexity of the agency required to implement it. While this seems like a reasonable assumption, it is an assumption nonetheless and therefore vulnerable to criticism. Answer choice A suggests that there is little relationship between tax code complexity and collection agency size, exactly fitting this assumption. A is therefore the correct answer. Answer choices B and E are out of scope with information that is peripheral to this assumption. Answer choice C might imply that some flat tax proposals require larger collection apparatus than others, but the fundamental connection between tax complexity and collection agency size remains missing so this answer is not correct. Answer choice D brings up a criticism that could be used against a flat tax law if the argument was proved incorrect, but does not itself prove the argument incorrect.
_________________
Everything will fall into place…

There is perfect timing for
everything and everyone.
Never doubt, But Work on
improving yourself,
Keep the faith and
It will all make sense.
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans   [#permalink] 10 Sep 2018, 18:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by