Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
16 Nov 2010, 10:16
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi all,
I have a question for everyone. I am currently a CPA in public accounting looking to eventually move into a management position in private industry (controller, CFO, etc). I'm considering obtaining an MBA as a way of rounding out my skill sets and making my profile more attractive for management type positions. I have two options for doing this, keep working and go part time to a school like BU or BC (ranked 30-40) or go full time to a top ten school like Tuck or Yale (assuming I can get in). I have calculated that between lost wages, higher tuition, etc, it would cost about $170,000 extra to do it full time vs part time. So my question is, generally speaking, is the difference between the value of an MBA from Tuck/Yale and the value of an MBA from BU/BC worth $170,000 and 2 lost years of work experience? I understand that money should not be the only consideration and that these questions are highly dependent on each individual's unique circumstances, but even some broad general advice would be helpful.
Thanks!
I have a question for everyone. I am currently a CPA in public accounting looking to eventually move into a management position in private industry (controller, CFO, etc). I'm considering obtaining an MBA as a way of rounding out my skill sets and making my profile more attractive for management type positions. I have two options for doing this, keep working and go part time to a school like BU or BC (ranked 30-40) or go full time to a top ten school like Tuck or Yale (assuming I can get in). I have calculated that between lost wages, higher tuition, etc, it would cost about $170,000 extra to do it full time vs part time. So my question is, generally speaking, is the difference between the value of an MBA from Tuck/Yale and the value of an MBA from BU/BC worth $170,000 and 2 lost years of work experience? I understand that money should not be the only consideration and that these questions are highly dependent on each individual's unique circumstances, but even some broad general advice would be helpful.
Thanks!
17 Nov 2010, 15:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
If you're looking to stay in a finance related role, IMO the full-time MBA isn't worth it. Especially if you want to go into a controller position, having significant public accounting experience - especially if it's Big 4 - is a more important credential than an MBA.
22 Nov 2010, 15:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
I agree -- as a CPA, your accounting will likely be just at par with most of the accounting courses in an MBA anyways, frankly. For the roles you describe, they usually look to people w/a good mix of Finance background with a strong operational understanding (not just a numbers guy). You can probably create a better path for this in industry vs. a MBA program choice
Good luck!
Aveek Guha, President, www.mbadaycamp.com
Good luck!
Aveek Guha, President, www.mbadaycamp.com
