GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 15 Oct 2019, 00:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Recently, a report commissioned by a confectioners trade association n

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2017
Posts: 168
Location: Argentina
Schools: HBS, Stanford, Wharton
GMAT 1: 630 Q43 V34

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2019, 16:15
2
2
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

79% (01:28) correct 21% (01:28) wrong based on 108 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Recently, a report commissioned by a confectioners trade association noted that chocolate, formerly considered a health scourge, is an effective antioxidant and so has health benefits. Another earlier claim was that oily foods clog arteries, leading to heart disease, yet reports now state that olive oil has a positive influence on the circulatory system. From these examples, it is clear that if you wait long enough, almost any food will be reported to be healthful.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
(A) relies on the truth of a claim by a source that is likely to be biased
(B) applies a general rule to specific cases to which it does not pertain
(C) bases an overly broad generalization on just a few instances
(D) takes for granted that all results of nutritional research are eventually reported
(E) fails to consider that there are many foods that are reported to be unhealthful

_________________
The HARDER you work, the LUCKIER you get.
Director
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 563
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
Re: Recently, a report commissioned by a confectioners trade association n  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2019, 06:23
Top Contributor
Quote:
Recently, a report commissioned by a confectioners trade association noted that chocolate, formerly considered a health scourge, is an effective antioxidant and so has health benefits. Another earlier claim was that oily foods clog arteries, leading to heart disease, yet reports now state that olive oil has a positive influence on the circulatory system. From these examples, it is clear that if you wait long enough, almost any food will be reported to be healthful.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
(A) relies on the truth of a claim by a source that is likely to be biased
(B) applies a general rule to specific cases to which it does not pertain
(C) bases an overly broad generalization on just a few instances
(D) takes for granted that all results of nutritional research are eventually reported
(E) fails to consider that there are many foods that are reported to be unhealthful

The correct answer here is C. For CR questions pertaining to the structure of the argument, all we need to look at is what the statements in the argument do. In this case, the argument gives two examples of an occurrence to say that the occurrence will always happen.

Option A - We've been given nothing about the nature of bias in the sources. Given that a confectionary company has produced the results about chocolates, this could be a bit of a trap answer. However, since this question asks us to deal solely with the structure of the argument, we need not look at the validity of the claim itself, only the structural flaw within it.

Option B - The argument actually does the opposite. It uses specific cases to make a conclusion about a general rule, but this option suggests it uses the general rule to estimate specific cases.

Option C - This is what the argument does, it uses a few examples, and makes a general extrapolation from them.

Option D - The problem in this option is not about the reporting, but about using the examples to extrapolate a general case.

Option E - The number of unhealthy foods is completely irrelevant. Even if there are many, the argument is not inconsistent for saying that they will eventually be found healthy. The mistake is the minimal evidence used.

- Matoo from CrackVerbal
_________________
- CrackVerbal Prep Team

Register for the Free GMAT Kickstarter Course : http://bit.ly/2DDHKHq

Register for our Personal Tutoring Course : https://www.crackverbal.com/gmat/personal-tutoring/

Join the free 4 part GMAT video training series : http://bit.ly/2DGm8tR
Re: Recently, a report commissioned by a confectioners trade association n   [#permalink] 07 Mar 2019, 06:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by