Last visit was: 21 May 2024, 14:21 It is currently 21 May 2024, 14:21
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Scientist: "Recent research in neuropsychology

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Joined: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 166
Own Kudos [?]: 481 [14]
Given Kudos: 84
Location: India
GMAT Date: 04-30-2015
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 869
Own Kudos [?]: 8576 [2]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Manager
Joined: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 166
Own Kudos [?]: 481 [1]
Given Kudos: 84
Location: India
GMAT Date: 04-30-2015
Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2015
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 51 [3]
Given Kudos: 54
GMAT Date: 02-08-2015
GPA: 3.7
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Scientist: "Recent research in neuropsychology [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Quote:
"Statements can be removed from their context without any loss of meaning"

If the author would have tried to make the above statement any more complicated, it would have certainly failed.

I feel like i almost don't understand english because i cannot seem to make sense of the above words.

I totally get the central idea behind the assumption but how exactly the above statement conveys that idea is something i am struggling with and is exactly what makes this qs little/more tricky.

Please if anyone could decipher these words into something that is logically coherent or rather simpler english, it would be great.

The sentence can be rephrased as: 'words mean exactly the same thing whatever context / situation / tone of voice etc you say them in.' The opposite to this statement would be: 'you cannot quote words without understanding the context they were spoken in - if you do, meaning is lost.' If that second statement was true, then the argument would not be true, because 'talk to you later' and 'I know' might have actually been said in a funny way or in a funny context.

Hope that helps?
Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Re: Scientist: "Recent research in neuropsychology [#permalink]
The argument concludes that laughter is less a response to humor than a kind of involuntary social signal.
The basis for this claim is that:
- 80 to 90 percent of laughter occurrences in in diverse settings was after statements not intended to have humor, such as "talk to you later" and "I know:"
It must assume that:
- The statements reflect fully the situation (to identify whether this is a humor or not)
- The pure statements are a kind of involuntary social signal.
A - OOS.
B - OOS.
C - This reflects the 1st analysis.CORRECT
D - Not an assumption, but an inference from the phrase "involuntary social signal".
E - Not necessarily.
Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2017
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 33
Re: Scientist: "Recent research in neuropsychology [#permalink]
My understanding is as follows :
Even If i remove sentences that have humor in them, people will still laugh. I can remove the sentences from the context, meaning will remain the same.
So, C is correct.
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1088
Own Kudos [?]: 1975 [0]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Scientist: "Recent research in neuropsychology [#permalink]
Scientist: "Recent research in neuropsychology suggests that laughter is less a response to humor than a kind of involuntary social signal. In one study, a social scientist observed instances of laughter in diverse settings, and found that 80 to 90 percent occurred after statements not intended to have humor, such as "talk to you later" and "I know:"

The argument above depends on which of the following unstated assumptions?

A. Laughter improves health and well-being. -We are not worried about the effects of laughter on ones health.

B. The diverse settings in the study included diverse populations as well. -Okay, this is a fact set. We are not worried about the population. The fact that the author has already considered diverse settings is more than sufficient to reach a conclusion.

C. Statements can be removed from their context without any loss of meaning. -Correct. The statements should mean the same even if some words are removed. The integrity of the meaning should be maintained.

D. People laugll because they believe they are expected to. -This is a weakener. It gives us another reason for the cause of laugh. It states that people don't laugh because they take laugh as a signal, instead they laugh because they are expected to laugh.

E. Humor and laughter are one and the same. -Out of scope
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 371
Own Kudos [?]: 476 [0]
Given Kudos: 1227
Location: India
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.5
Scientist: "Recent research in neuropsychology [#permalink]

A. Laughter improves health and well-being. - Out of Scope - OUT

B. The diverse settings in the study included diverse
populations as well. - Negate it, not diverse population, but still diverse settings hold good

C. Statements can be removed from their context

D. People laugll because they believe they are
expected to. - This is Incorrect, if people laugh because they believe they are expected to, then it becomes voluntary

E. Humor and laughter are one and the same. - It is not same

Thanks
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 371
Own Kudos [?]: 476 [0]
Given Kudos: 1227
Location: India
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.5
Re: Scientist: "Recent research in neuropsychology [#permalink]
Hi Experts,

I Answered C only by POE.

A. Laughter improves health and well-being. - Out of Scope - OUT

B. The diverse settings in the study included diverse
populations as well. - Negate it, not diverse population, but still diverse settings hold good

C. Statements can be removed from their context
without any loss of meaning. - Only choice left.

D. People laugll because they believe they are
expected to. - This is Incorrect, if people laugh because they believe they are expected to, then it becomes voluntary

E. Humor and laughter are one and the same. - It is not same

Thanks
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17351
Own Kudos [?]: 851 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: Scientist: "Recent research in neuropsychology [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Scientist: "Recent research in neuropsychology [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6936 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts