It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 08:25

# Live Now:

GMAT Verbal Live on YouTube: Join Now!

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 164

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 101

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2017, 08:36
sayantanc2k wrote:
techiesam wrote:
I have two specific question on this one
1.What is exactly being compared in B?
2.What is wrong with option C?

1. Objects compared:
A. The proportion of television costs in presidential spending in 1992 (Proportion = more than 1/2)
B. The proportion of television costs in presidential spending in any election before 1992

2. "They" refers to "television costs". Television costs are not compared - the proportion of the television costs is compared. So the pronoun should be "it", not "they".

If the pronoun should be it then why A is wrong? Is that because the verb was?

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 101

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Aiming MBA
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 2499

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 64

Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, Technology
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.65
WE: Information Technology (Health Care)
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2017, 08:45
techiesam wrote:
If the pronoun should be it then why A is wrong? Is that because the verb was?

Hi techiesam ,

I think you misunderstood what sayantanc2k tried to convey.

He meant "they" cannot be used to compare the proportion. Proportion can be compared using "it".

But in A, this "it" can refer to two things: proportion or campaign. So, it has pronoun ambiguity error and hence incorrect.

Had the sentence been something like below, it would have been correct.

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

Did you notice "it" here has only one antecedent. Hence, correct.

I hope it makes sense.
_________________

V21 ---> V40!

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 64

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 164

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 101

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2017, 08:53
abhimahna wrote:
techiesam wrote:
If the pronoun should be it then why A is wrong? Is that because the verb was?

Hi techiesam ,

I think you misunderstood what sayantanc2k tried to convey.

He meant "they" cannot be used to compare the proportion. Proportion can be compared using "it".

But in A, this "it" can refer to two things: proportion or campaign. So, it has pronoun ambiguity error and hence incorrect.

Had the sentence been something like below, it would have been correct.

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

Did you notice "it" here has only one antecedent. Hence, correct.

I hope it makes sense.

Thank you
My initial thought was that "spending" of different timeline was compared.By the way,in the sentence written by you,doesn't spending also qualify as a contender for it as spending is a noun?

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 101

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Aiming MBA
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 2499

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 64

Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, Technology
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.65
WE: Information Technology (Health Care)
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2017, 09:06
techiesam wrote:
Thank you
My initial thought was that "spending" of different timeline was compared.By the way,in the sentence written by you,doesn't spending also qualify as a contender for it as spending is a noun?

Hi techiesam ,

Yes, it does. But note that the proportion is also referring to the spending only. So, either way we are referring to spending by using "it".

This type of pronoun reference is acceptable on GMAT.

I hope it makes sense.
_________________

V21 ---> V40!

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 64

Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 694

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 855

Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2017, 06:12
We can eliminate D and E for using the relative pronoun "which" because it's not 1992 that is "greater than..."

C can be eliminated for using the present perfect "have been" to describe past elections.

A uses "it was." What was a greater proportion than in any previous election? Soaring TV costs. Costs are plural and "it was" is singular, so we have an agreement error.

Subject :- soaring television costs(Plural). So, The choices using singular pronoun or verb such as "it" in A, "was so" in D and greater than "it" has in E are out.

A. a greater proportion than it was
This sentence has pronoun reference error. The pronoun "it" can only refer to "spending in the presidential campaign" or to "presidential campaign". Both these references are non-sensical in the context of this sentence.

B. a greater proportion than
This option compares spending over two election periods. Correct.

C. a greater proportion than they have been
The only plural referent for "they' is "soaring television costs". This will result in is an illogical comparison.

D. which is greater than was so
The reference made by "which modifier" is not clear. Is "which" referring to "presidential campaign of 1992" or spending in presidential campaign of 1992" or so on. Thus, use of which modifier is ambiguous.

E. which is greater than it has been
Same as D.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 855

Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 694

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 855

Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2017, 06:16
We can eliminate D and E for using the relative pronoun "which" because it's not 1992 that is "greater than..."

C can be eliminated for using the present perfect "have been" to describe past elections.

A uses "it was." What was a greater proportion than in any previous election? Soaring TV costs. Costs are plural and "it was" is singular, so we have an agreement error.

Subject :- soaring television costs(Plural). So, The choices using singular pronoun or verb such as "it" in A, "was so" in D and greater than "it" has in E are out.

A. a greater proportion than it was
This sentence has pronoun reference error. The pronoun "it" can only refer to "spending in the presidential campaign" or to "presidential campaign". Both these references are non-sensical in the context of this sentence.

B. a greater proportion than
This option compares spending over two election periods. Correct.

C. a greater proportion than they have been
The only plural referent for "they' is "soaring television costs". This will result in is an illogical comparison.

D. which is greater than was so
The reference made by "which modifier" is not clear. Is "which" referring to "presidential campaign of 1992" or spending in presidential campaign of 1992" or so on. Thus, use of which modifier is ambiguous.

E. which is greater than it has been
Same as D.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 855

Manager
Status: To infinity and beyond
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 5

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.31
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2017, 11:59
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

A. a greater proportion than it was
B. a greater proportion than
C. a greater proportion than they have been
D. which is greater than was so
E. which is greater than it has been

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 5

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in   [#permalink] 27 Sep 2017, 11:59

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 47 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.