generis GMATNinjaVeritasPrepKarishmaCan you add two cents?
Here in my understanding:
Step 1:
In an assumption question, my first step is to identify the conclusion.
here, main conclusion is:
the university would increase its job placement rate
(Why?)
Conditional premise:
if the university could require
all of its student job applicants to send handwritten thank-you notes.
Step 2: I try to answer either of two questions to find a valid assumption:
1. Under what circumstances, will the conclusion not hold true?
I am negating conclusion, not premise here.
The valid assumption is: Such circumstances DO NOT EXIST.
(Why) because if it exists, then my conclusion breaks down
E.g. What if students wrote just as a good will gesture back to authorities with no clue of what's going on in minds of recruiters. Students night not be aware that recruiters like hand written notes and perceive them as a positive note while recruiting new people.
2. What else NEEDS TO BE TRUE to bridge the gap between a premise
and conclusion? Or What ELSE MUST BE TRUE for my conclusion to be true
other than mentioned premises
The step -2 is taking me hell of at time and not very productive.
Can I think of assumption as one
strengthening my conclusion, with IMPORTANT note that this
NEEDS BE PRESENT for my conclusion to be valid one
Step 3: PoE
Quote:
A) The 40% increase in job offer likelihood was consistent across all industries to which students applied for jobs.
The highlighted text makes this answer choice incorrect.
Quote:
B) No handwritten thank-you notes sent by mail reached their recipientsafter the decision for a job offer had already been made.
We are concerned with what can lead to : same / lower placement rate in universities?
The correct negation is:
At least one handwritten thank-you note sent by mail reached their recipients
after the decision for a job offer had already been made.
Not sure if it helps to break down my conclusion.
Quote:
C) Student job applicants were no more likely to send handwritten thank-you notes after interviews they felt were successful than after those that they felt were not
I am loosing my trust on negation.
Student job applicants
were more likely to send handwritten thank-you notes after interviews they felt were successful than after those that they felt were not.
Or
Student job applicants were not more likely to send handwritten thank-you notes
before interviews they felt were successful than after those that they felt were not.
How any of this helps to break my conclusion apart?
Quote:
D) Employers are no more likely to discard a handwritten piece of mail than they are to delete or ignore a piece of unsolicited e-mail.
Totally irrelevant to scope of argument.
Quote:
E) It does not take significantly more time and effort to send a handwritten thank-you note than it does to express gratitude via e-mail
Totally irrelevant to scope of argument.
Applicants who mailed a handwritten thank-you note after a job interview were 40% more likely to receive job offers
If the university could require all of its student job applicants to send handwritten thank-you notes, the university would increase its job placement rate
We are saying that simply making applicants write handwritten notes will increase their chances of getting job offer.
- that the applicants writing handwritten notes on their own are not the ones who work harder anyway and hence have a higher probability of getting accepted
- that the applicants who did better in the interview are not the ones writing handwritten notes and hence have a higher probability of getting accepted etc.
We are saying that if anyone writes handwritten notes, they increase their chances of getting selected.
Choice (C): Student job applicants were no more likely to send handwritten thank-you notes after interviews they felt were successful than after those that they felt were not.
The second case - That the applicants who did better in the interview are not the ones writing handwritten notes and hence have a higher probability of getting accepted etc.
If we negate it, we get - Student job applicants were likely to send handwritten thank-you notes after interviews they felt were successful than after those that they felt were not.
If applicants are more likely to send hand written notes after successful interviews (as per their opinion), the probability of getting selected is anyway higher (due to successful interviews). So it would not be the handwritten thank you note doing the trick at all. Then our conclusion would fail.