GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 15 Oct 2019, 07:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The proposed coal-burning electric plant should be approved,

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior PS Moderator
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 737
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
The proposed coal-burning electric plant should be approved,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2019, 11:18
6
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (01:53) correct 35% (01:58) wrong based on 279 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The proposed coal-burning electric plant should be approved, since no good arguments have been offered against it. After all, all the arguments against it have been presented by competing electricity producers.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the reasoning above depends?

(A) The competing electricity producers would stand to lose large amount of revenue from the building of a coal-burning electric plant.
(B) If a person's arguments against a proposal are defective, then the person has a vested interest in seeing that the proposal is not implemented.
(C) Approval of coal-burning electric plant would please coal suppliers more than disapproval would please suppliers of fuel to the competing electricity producers.
(D) If good arguments are presented for a proposal, then that proposal should be approved.
(E) Arguments made by those who have a vested interest in the outcome of a proposal are not good arguments.

Posted from my mobile device

_________________
Regards,

“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9701
Location: Pune, India
Re: The proposed coal-burning electric plant should be approved,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Mar 2019, 05:08
2
The proposed coal-burning electric plant should be approved, since no good arguments have been offered against it. After all, all the arguments against it have been presented by competing electricity producers.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the reasoning above depends?

(A) The competing electricity producers would stand to lose large amount of revenue from the building of a coal-burning electric plant.
(B) If a person's arguments against a proposal are defective, then the person has a vested interest in seeing that the proposal is not implemented.
(C) Approval of coal-burning electric plant would please coal suppliers more than disapproval would please suppliers of fuel to the competing electricity producers.
(D) If good arguments are presented for a proposal, then that proposal should be approved.
(E) Arguments made by those who have a vested interest in the outcome of a proposal are not good arguments.

Posted from my mobile device

All arguments against the proposed coal-burning electric plant have been presented by competing electricity producers
So no good arguments have been offered against the proposed coal-burning electric plant.

Conclusion: The proposed coal-burning electric plant should be approved

There are some assumptions here:
Competitors (people with vested interests) cannot give good arguments.
If there are no good arguments against a proposal, it should be carried out.

Let's look at the options.

(A) The competing electricity producers would stand to lose large amount of revenue from the building of a coal-burning electric plant.

We are not assuming anything about revenue being lost. Irrelevant.

(B) If a person's arguments against a proposal are defective, then the person has a vested interest in seeing that the proposal is not implemented.

Not true. This flips the actual situation. Actually the argument is assuming that if a person has vested interest, his arguments are not good. On the other hand, this option says that if a person's arguments are not good, he has vested interests. Not necessary. Perhaps the person's arguments are not good because he is not smart enough to give good arguments. It needn't be that he must have a vested interest. For example, a media person could talk about the proposal and give some not-so-good arguments against it. But that could just be his opinion. It doesn't mean that he has vested interests in seeing that the proposal is not implemented.

(C) Approval of coal-burning electric plant would please coal suppliers more than disapproval would please suppliers of fuel to the competing electricity producers.

Irrelevant. We are not assuming whom the proposal will please and whom it won't.

(D) If good arguments are presented for a proposal, then that proposal should be approved.

The argument doesn't talk about good arguments FOR a proposal so we are not assuming anything about them.

(E) Arguments made by those who have a vested interest in the outcome of a proposal are not good arguments.

Yes, this is what we are assuming. Since competitors have given the arguments against the proposal, we are assuming that the arguments are not good.

_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

##### General Discussion
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7958
Re: The proposed coal-burning electric plant should be approved,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2019, 20:21
1
The proposed coal-burning electric plant should be approved, since no good arguments have been offered against it. After all, all the arguments against it have been presented by competing electricity producers.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the reasoning above depends?

(A) The competing electricity producers would stand to lose large amount of revenue from the building of a coal-burning electric plant.
(B) If a person's arguments against a proposal are defective, then the person has a vested interest in seeing that the proposal is not implemented.
(C) Approval of coal-burning electric plant would please coal suppliers more than disapproval would please suppliers of fuel to the competing electricity producers.
(D) If good arguments are presented for a proposal, then that proposal should be approved.
(E) Arguments made by those who have a vested interest in the outcome of a proposal are not good arguments.

Posted from my mobile device

Now this is an ASSUMPTION question, so we have to look for the gap..
We initially talk of lack of 'good arguments', and then says ' after all these are from competitors'..
So we have to connect competitors argument with good argument..

E says exactly the same and fills this gap..
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2019
Posts: 336
Re: The proposed coal-burning electric plant should be approved,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2019, 21:38
IMO B .

not good = defective argument
and they have vested interest in seeing proposal is not implemented .

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Posts: 146
WE: Operations (Commercial Banking)
Re: The proposed coal-burning electric plant should be approved,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2019, 13:35
I am still confused between d and e

Why is d incorrect? Option e does have a proper linkage though. I agree with e as well.

Still cannot eliminate d on solid grounds!

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Joined: 22 May 2018
Posts: 49
Re: The proposed coal-burning electric plant should be approved,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2019, 03:56
I am still confused between d and e

Why is d incorrect? Option e does have a proper linkage though. I agree with e as well.

Still cannot eliminate d on solid grounds!

Posted from my mobile device

We dont know whether the arguments made by competitors are good or bad and hence we cannot assume.
_________________
Re: The proposed coal-burning electric plant should be approved,   [#permalink] 24 Mar 2019, 03:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by