May 24 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. May 25 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. May 27 01:00 AM PDT  11:59 PM PDT All GMAT Club Tests are free and open on May 27th for Memorial Day! May 27 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Special savings are here for Magoosh GMAT Prep! Even better  save 20% on the plan of your choice, now through midnight on Tuesday, 5/27 May 30 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Application deadlines are just around the corner, so now’s the time to start studying for the GMAT! Start today and save 25% on your GMAT prep. Valid until May 30th.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 14

The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jan 2010, 12:15
Question Stats:
54% (02:19) correct 46% (02:25) wrong based on 2577 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each responded "Favorable" or "Unfavorable" or "Not Sure" when asked about their impressions of Candidate M and of Candidate N. What was the number of voters who responded "Favorable" for both candidates? (1) The number of voters who did not respond "Favorable" for either candidate was 40. (2) The number of voters who responded "Unfavorable" for both candidates was 10. Attachment:
Candidates.png [ 18.87 KiB  Viewed 62745 times ]
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55271

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jan 2010, 16:03
The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each responded "Favorable" or "Unfavorable" or "Not Sure" when asked about their impressions of Candidate M and of Candidate N. What was the number of voters who responded "Favorable" for both candidates?Voters responded favorable for at least one candidates = 40+30x = 70x (x represent the # of voters who responded favorable for both candidates) (1) The number of voters who did not respond “favorable” for either candidate was 40 > The voters responded favorable for at least one 10040=60=70x > x=10. Sufficient. (2) The number of voters who responded “unfavorable” for both candidates was 10. Clearly not sufficient. Answer A.
_________________




Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 495

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jul 2011, 05:16
siddhans wrote: How to solve this using 3X3 matrix? and how to solve this using venn diagram formula (M or N) = (M )+ (N ) (M and N)...please explain in detail??? Also, what does statement 1 mean ??and how can it be represented in 3x3 matrix? Attachment: img.doc The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters each responded “favorable” or “unfavorable” or “not sure” when asked about their impressions of candidate M and of candidate N. What was the number of voters who responded “favorable” for both candidates? (1) The number of voters who did not respond “favorable” for either candidate was 40. (2) The number of voters who responded “unfavorable” for both candidates was 10. A. No of voters who dint respond favourable = 40 this mean people who responded favourable are 10040 = 60 therefore No. of people who responded fav for both are 40+3060 = 10 B not sufficient.




Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 278

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jul 2011, 03:20
How to solve this using 3X3 matrix? and how to solve this using venn diagram formula (M or N) = (M )+ (N ) (M and N)...please explain in detail??? Also, what does statement 1 mean ??and how can it be represented in 3x3 matrix? Attachment:
img.doc [27.5 KiB]
Downloaded 1381 times
The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters each responded “favorable” or “unfavorable” or “not sure” when asked about their impressions of candidate M and of candidate N. What was the number of voters who responded “favorable” for both candidates? (1) The number of voters who did not respond “favorable” for either candidate was 40. (2) The number of voters who responded “unfavorable” for both candidates was 10.



GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1527

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jul 2011, 05:17
siddhans wrote: What was the number of voters who responded “favorable” for both candidates?
(1) The number of voters who did not respond “favorable” for either candidate was 40.
(2) The number of voters who responded “unfavorable” for both candidates was 10. A lot of the information in the table just serves as a distraction here. The first column of the table gives us a standard 2circle Venn diagram: those people who like M, those people who like N, and those people who like both. We want to know how many like both. If we know exactly how many people are in our diagram (i.e. how many people responded 'favourable' to at least one candidate), we can answer that question. Statement 1 tells us that 40 of the 100 people are *not* in our diagram, so 60 people must be in the diagram, and that info is sufficient. I can't draw a Venn diagram here, but I'd fill it in as follows: Favorable for M only: 40  x Favorable for both M and N: x Favorable for N only: 30  x From Statement 1 I know these three quantities add to 60, which gives me one equation in one unknown. Statement 2 doesn't tell you how many people are in the diagram, so is not sufficient. As for your question about using a 'matrix' or 'formula' here, I wouldn't consider doing either.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com



Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 318
WE 1: Business Development

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Aug 2011, 13:30
I had trouble to understand this table, bc it says that they asked 100 people, but we have 200 answers. Can someone please explain me that? thanks.
_________________



Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Posts: 646

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Aug 2011, 19:25
we are seeing 200 responses because each voter casted two votes , one for each candidate. i.e 1 voter  2 votes 100 voters  200 votes 1. Sufficient NF+NS = 40 F = 100  40 = 60 Assume this F as big overlapping set and now look at the each individual values of this set from the table. i.e 40+30  both = F total = 60 => both = 10 2. not sufficient because we only know about NF. we dont know anything about the NS and hence we cannot calculate both with the given info. Answer is A. 144144 wrote: I had trouble to understand this table, bc it says that they asked 100 people, but we have 200 answers.
Can someone please explain me that?
thanks.



Director
Joined: 23 Apr 2010
Posts: 538

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Nov 2011, 03:27
Can someone please explain why (1) is sufficient? What I don't understand is this:
We know that 100 people took a survey. From the statement "The number of voters who did not respond “Favorable” for either candidate was 40" we can conclude that 10040=60 people responded either favorable for at least one or responded unsure. Where am I going wrong?
Thanks a lot.



Director
Joined: 23 Apr 2010
Posts: 538

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Nov 2011, 03:52
OK. I solved my previous question. But there's one more:
(1) 40+30=70 is the number of people who responded favorable for at least one candidate. (2) 70x is the number of people who responded favorable for exactly one candidate. (3) 10040=60 is the number of people who responded favorable for at least one candidate.
What I don't understand is that in (1) we got 70, and in (2) we got 60 for the number of people who responded favorable for at least one candidate. The solution by Bunuel would make sense if 60 was the number of people who responded favorable for exactly one candidate.
I would appreciate if someone could explain.
Thanks a lot.



Director
Joined: 23 Apr 2010
Posts: 538

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Nov 2011, 05:31
I think I got it figured out. In 30+40 we have counted the intersection (M&&N) twice.



Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 217
Concentration: Leadership, Marketing
GMAT 1: 540 Q36 V28 GMAT 2: 550 Q39 V27 GMAT 3: 620 Q42 V33
GPA: 2.82
WE: Human Resources (Health Care)

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Mar 2013, 16:25
still cannot understand ... any body can present a matrix please ? thanks in advance
_________________



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9238
Location: Pune, India

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Mar 2013, 02:12
TheNona wrote: still cannot understand ... any body can present a matrix please ? thanks in advance I am assuming you are unable to figure out why statement 1 is sufficient. Think of it this way: (1) The number of voters who did not respond "Favorable" for either candidate was 40. This means that 60 voters responded 'Favorable' for at least one candidate, right? Now we need to find how many responded Favorable to both. Now forget this question and think of another sets question: There are 60 voters in a constituency. Each voter has to vote 'favorable' for at least one of the two candidates  M and N. Candidate M gets 40 favorable votes and candidate N gets 30 favorable votes. How many voters voted 'favorable' for both the candidates? It's an easy enough question with 2 sets. You will just use 60 = 30 + 40  Both Both = 10 This is exactly what is required of you in this question. Just that there is a lot of other data to distract you. You know that 60 voters voted favorable for atleast one candidate. You also know that M got 40 favorable votes and N got 30 favorable votes (from the table int he question). you just need to find the value of 'both'. Focus on what you have to find, and the given relevant info.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 217
Concentration: Leadership, Marketing
GMAT 1: 540 Q36 V28 GMAT 2: 550 Q39 V27 GMAT 3: 620 Q42 V33
GPA: 2.82
WE: Human Resources (Health Care)

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Mar 2013, 07:03
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: TheNona wrote: still cannot understand ... any body can present a matrix please ? thanks in advance I am assuming you are unable to figure out why statement 1 is sufficient. Think of it this way: (1) The number of voters who did not respond "Favorable" for either candidate was 40. This means that 60 voters responded 'Favorable' for at least one candidate, right? Now we need to find how many responded Favorable to both. Now forget this question and think of another sets question: There are 60 voters in a constituency. Each voter has to vote 'favorable' for at least one of the two candidates  M and N. Candidate M gets 40 favorable votes and candidate N gets 30 favorable votes. How many voters voted 'favorable' for both the candidates? It's an easy enough question with 2 sets. You will just use 60 = 30 + 40  Both Both = 10 This is exactly what is required of you in this question. Just that there is a lot of other data to distract you. You know that 60 voters voted favorable for atleast one candidate. You also know that M got 40 favorable votes and N got 30 favorable votes (from the table int he question). you just need to find the value of 'both'. Focus on what you have to find, and the given relevant info. Thanks Karishma for the great explanation . In fact what I was struggling with is the insufficiency of B . Cannot understand why ?
_________________



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9238
Location: Pune, India

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Mar 2013, 21:09
TheNona wrote: Thanks Karishma for the great explanation . In fact what I was struggling with is the insufficiency of B . Cannot understand why ? Let's consider statement 2: (2) The number of voters who responded “unfavorable” for both candidates was 10. So this means that 90 people replied "favorable" or "not sure" to at least one of the candidates. Also, going back to the table in the question, Unfavorable for candidate M = 20 Unfavorable for candidate N = 35 Unfavorable for both = 10 Unfavorable for at least one = 20 + 35  10 = 45 So, all we know from here is the following: 1. 10 people responded "unfavorable" to both candidates 2. 35 (= 45  10) people responded "unfavorable to one candidate and "favorable" or "not sure" to the other. 3. 55 people responded with "favorable" or "not sure" to both the candidates. Now we don't know the split between "favorable" and "not sure". It is possible that 10 people responded "favorable" to both and it is also possible that that number is 15.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Intern
Joined: 30 Jan 2014
Posts: 3

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Mar 2014, 13:48
I didn't see this explicitly mentioned on this thread or the OA but....
For Statement 1, is this the formula that was used??
A + B  both + neither = total
40 + 30  X + 40 = 100
X = 10
If so, I'm confused why the total is 100 and not 70, any help would be greatly appreciated thanks!



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9238
Location: Pune, India

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Mar 2014, 20:55
kaji wrote: I didn't see this explicitly mentioned on this thread or the OA but....
For Statement 1, is this the formula that was used??
A + B  both + neither = total
40 + 30  X + 40 = 100
X = 10
If so, I'm confused why the total is 100 and not 70, any help would be greatly appreciated thanks! When you are considering the set of 'neither', you must take the total 'total'. 'total' would be either 60 or 100 (and not 70 because 70 is not the number of people. It is the number of instances which includes double counting of people who favor both candidates) depending on whether you include neither or not. A + B  Both = 60 (the total number of people who favor at least one) 30 + 40  Both = 60 Both = 10 OR A + B  Both + Neither = 100 (total number of people including those who favored neither candidate) 30 + 40  Both + 40 = 100 Both = 10 Remember, in this formula, 'total' is the total number of people without any double counting.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2014
Posts: 47

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Aug 2014, 02:07
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: TheNona wrote: Thanks Karishma for the great explanation . In fact what I was struggling with is the insufficiency of B . Cannot understand why ? Let's consider statement 2: (2) The number of voters who responded “unfavorable” for both candidates was 10. So this means that 90 people replied "favorable" or "not sure" to at least one of the candidates.Also, going back to the table in the question, Unfavorable for candidate M = 20 Unfavorable for candidate N = 35 Unfavorable for both = 10 Unfavorable for at least one = 20 + 35  10 = 45 So, all we know from here is the following: 1. 10 people responded "unfavorable" to both candidates 2. 35 (= 45  10) people responded "unfavorable to one candidate and "favorable" or "not sure" to the other. 3. 55 people responded with "favorable" or "not sure" to both the candidates. Now we don't know the split between "favorable" and "not sure". It is possible that 10 people responded "favorable" to both and it is also possible that that number is 15. I don't understand why we assume that the 90 responded "favorable" or "not sure" but concerning the first statement we say that 60 people responded "favorable" ? What about the fraction of the 60 people who responded "not sure"? Are the "not sure" people included in the 40?



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9238
Location: Pune, India

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Aug 2014, 22:31
lou34 wrote: I don't understand why we assume that the 90 responded "favorable" or "not sure" but concerning the first statement we say that 60 people responded "favorable" ? What about the fraction of the 60 people who responded "not sure"? Are the "not sure" people included in the 40? The structure of the two statements is quite different: (1) The number of voters who did not respond "Favorable" for either candidate was 40. 40 people did not give "Favorable" to either. It means the rest of the 60 people gave Favorable to at least one or both the candidates. (2) The number of voters who responded "Unfavorable" for both candidates was 10. 10 people responded Unfavorable for both. It means the rest of the 90 people gave either "Favorable" or "Not Sure" to at least one of the two candidates.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2014
Posts: 47

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Aug 2014, 00:41
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: lou34 wrote: I don't understand why we assume that the 90 responded "favorable" or "not sure" but concerning the first statement we say that 60 people responded "favorable" ? What about the fraction of the 60 people who responded "not sure"? Are the "not sure" people included in the 40? The structure of the two statements is quite different: (1) The number of voters who did not respond "Favorable" for either candidate was 40. 40 people did not give "Favorable" to either. It means the rest of the 60 people gave Favorable to at least one or both the candidates. (2) The number of voters who responded "Unfavorable" for both candidates was 10. 10 people responded Unfavorable for both. It means the rest of the 90 people gave either "Favorable" or "Not Sure" to at least one of the two candidates. Right after I had submitted my question, I understood the differences thanks for your reply anyway!



Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2014
Posts: 3
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, General Management
Schools: Sloan '17, Ross '17, Tuck '17, Duke '17, Darden '17, McCombs '17, Tepper '17, KenanFlagler '17, Said'16, ISB '16, Goizueta '17
GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Energy and Utilities)

Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Oct 2014, 09:25
Hi Karishma, Thanks for the detailed explanation. In your response, 'Unfavorable for at least one = 20 + 35  10 = 45'. Shouldn't it be "exactly one" instead of "atleast one" Thanks, Venkitaraman.S VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: TheNona wrote: Thanks Karishma for the great explanation . In fact what I was struggling with is the insufficiency of B . Cannot understand why ? Let's consider statement 2: (2) The number of voters who responded “unfavorable” for both candidates was 10. So this means that 90 people replied "favorable" or "not sure" to at least one of the candidates. Also, going back to the table in the question, Unfavorable for candidate M = 20 Unfavorable for candidate N = 35 Unfavorable for both = 10 Unfavorable for at least one = 20 + 35  10 = 45 So, all we know from here is the following: 1. 10 people responded "unfavorable" to both candidates 2. 35 (= 45  10) people responded "unfavorable to one candidate and "favorable" or "not sure" to the other. 3. 55 people responded with "favorable" or "not sure" to both the candidates. Now we don't know the split between "favorable" and "not sure". It is possible that 10 people responded "favorable" to both and it is also possible that that number is 15.




Re: The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters who each
[#permalink]
21 Oct 2014, 09:25



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 39 posts ]



