Bombsante wrote:
Hi,
MartyTargetTestPrepSuggestions noted. Please find below responses to some of the points that you have raised:
I believe choice D is contradictory because the passage clearly states that the two smaller bridges become congested with vehicular traffic whenever there is a traffic incident on the main bridge. There is no mention of the capacity of the bridges to handle increased traffic. If choice D were true, no traffic congestion should happen during the closure of the main bridge.
That reasoning is not quite correct. It could be the case that the smaller bridges can handle more traffic than they usually handle and, at the same time, that the bridges cannot handle the amount of traffic that arrives at them when there is a traffic incident on the main bridge.
For instance, each of the smaller bridges could usually handle 15 cars per minute. Each could be capable of handling 30 cars per minute. Each could be congested by the arrival of 40 cars per minute when there is a traffic incident on the main bridge.
Quote:
What I meant by saying "Why they would use public transport" is that if people know in advance and they are keen to use public transport than there might be a reason behind it. They would be anticipating reduced traffic congestion in case of using public transport.
This reasoning seems to be almost the reverse of what's implied by choice (B). What's implied by choice (B) is that people anticipate traffic problems, i.e, traffic WITH congestion, because they are aware that the main bridge is closed for maintenance, and that, therefore, because of their anticipating traffic problems, people use public transportation and, thus, cause there not to be congestion.