Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Carolyn and Brett - nicely explained what is the typical day of a UCLA student. I am posting below recording of the webinar for those who could't attend this session.
Re: There are three circles, with radii 2, 4 and 5, respectively
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Jun 2013, 12:43
1
There are three circles, with radii 2, 4 and 5, respectively, that lie on a plane. Do any two of these circles intersect with each other?
(1) The centres of the three circles lie on a straight line Not sufficient. Consider the case in which, even on the same line they are 1 away from each other ( hence they intersect) or the case in which they are 100 away from each other (hence they do not intersect)
(2) The greatest distance between the centres of any two of these circles is 7 Since even the distance between the 4 and 5 radius circle is 7, they will intersect. Those two circles intersect because the distance between their centers is less than 4+5=9. Sufficient
_________________
It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.
What if centers of circles are 5 radius : (0,0) 4 radius : (0.5,0) 2 radius : (1,0)
Here, Centers are on straight line but circles are not intersecting. Hence it should be E right?
Thank you
(2) says that the greatest distance between the centres of any two of these circles is 7. In your examples this condition is not met.
_________________
What if centers of circles are 5 radius : (0,0) 4 radius : (0.5,0) 2 radius : (1,0)
Here, Centers are on straight line but circles are not intersecting. Hence it should be E right?
Thank you
(2) says that the greatest distance between the centres of any two of these circles is 7. In your examples this condition is not met.
[/quote]
Dear Bunuel,
Sorry but I really didn't understand. It said GREATEST, that means distance can be zero to seven. I suppose in my example it's met. If it just said that the distance between any two circles is 7 then I guess your point is correct. Can you pls explain why GREATEST is not playing significant role here?
Re: There are three circles, with radii 2, 4 and 5, respectively
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2013, 10:07
1
Shashank1149 wrote:
Dear Bunuel,
Sorry but I really didn't understand. It said GREATEST, that means distance can be zero to seven. I suppose in my example it's met. If it just said that the distance between any two circles is 7 then I guess your point is correct. Can you pls explain why GREATEST is not playing significant role here?
Thank you
You misinterpreted the statement. It means that the distance IS 7 between the centers of 2 particular circles of the 3 but the distance between any other two of these circles is not more than that.
_________________
Re: There are three circles, with radii 2, 4 and 5, respectively
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Sep 2018, 14:51
guerrero25 wrote:
There are three circles, with radii 2, 4 and 5, respectively, that lie on a plane. Do any two of these circles intersect with each other?
(1) The centres of the three circles lie on a straight line
(2) The greatest distance between the centres of any two of these circles is 7
1 gives very little information
2 is a good trap but not sufficient because while it is clear that their areas may overlap, they may or may not overlap. Example- two may be concentric circles.
Combining also, the reasoning above in 2 keeps both yes and no possibility open.
Re: There are three circles, with radii 2, 4 and 5, respectively
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Sep 2018, 14:55
Ohhh, my bad. They are bound to touch for sure, using 2.
I am treating touching and intersecting as different but touching is a foreally of intersecting.
B it is.
Md231 wrote:
guerrero25 wrote:
There are three circles, with radii 2, 4 and 5, respectively, that lie on a plane. Do any two of these circles intersect with each other?
(1) The centres of the three circles lie on a straight line
(2) The greatest distance between the centres of any two of these circles is 7
1 gives very little information
2 is a good trap but not sufficient because while it is clear that their areas may overlap, they may or may not overlap. Example- two may be concentric circles.
Combining also, the reasoning above in 2 keeps both yes and no possibility open.
E.
Good question but doesn't taste like GMAT.
gmatclubot
Re: There are three circles, with radii 2, 4 and 5, respectively &nbs
[#permalink]
29 Sep 2018, 14:55
close
75% (00:52) correct 
