It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 09:40

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Updated: Q50V32, 690 (90%)

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1434

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

Updated: Q50V32, 690 (90%) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2007, 14:09
Friends,

Thanks for all the congrats…much appreciated. I was expecting my verbal to be a bit higher, but oh well. I wish my score is 10 points higher because that would reach my target of 700, but I won’t complain. I was expecting something between 680 and 720. At this point, I’ll accept the 690 and move on to my application because I really want to apply R2 this year, although I am not sure what to think of this score. I am planning to apply for top schools and this score certainly doesn’t put me ahead of the crowd, but also it won’t put me in the bottom of the crowd either. So I guess I’ll just have to do well on other stuff. I don’t think I can afford two more months of studying because the deadline is coming up soon. If I were given two more months, I truly believe I can reach my 700 goal. I wish I started studying for GMAT earlier. Right now, I’ll just have to divide my time wisely.

Yesterday wasn’t my first attempt at GMAT. Here is a past result:

GMAT1: Q51 V20, 620 (1 month ago)
GMAT2: Q50 V32, 690 (yesterday)

I am able to bump my verbal from 20 to 32 in a month, not bad. However, I must say that nervousness played significant role in my horrible score of 20, so in a way that score isn’t accurate of my ability. During that test, I couldn’t comprehend what I read and I ended up guessing a lot of the questions. I knew I messed up even before I completed the test. Afterward, I was very upset, but determined not to make the same mistake again. I searched a few posts in this forum and was able to get some good advices. BCC145’s post is advice I took. Basically the strategy is to treat the test as another day. This strategy worked amazingly well for me. I felt that I was focused and able to comprehend the readings through out the test. Thanks BCC145.

My problem with verbal is not the difficulty of the content, but the timing. Given the time, I believe I can do most of the problems. Because I am a slow reader, every GMATprep exam that I have taken, I was not able to finish the test and often forced to guess 7-8 questions. I usually guess a whole last RC passage to maximize my time. As a result, my verbal score never go above 37 in GMAT prep (42 is my highest in MGMAT). At this point, I haven’t figure out a way to become a more efficient reader. If I plan to take GMAT again, I would definitely take some time to read a book about this.

For Math, I won’t say much. My past score shows 51 and 50. The only difference between 51 and 50, in my opinion, is that I guess one question yesterday. When I got 51, I was confident that I got everything right. Maybe it is that one question that caused the difference between 50 and 51, I don’t know. A point to remember for someone who is shooting for 51 in Math.

Thanks for everything…you guys/gals have been an important part of this score. Please PM me anytime. I’ll still be checking this forum for a while. I think there is some good info that can help my application in different section of this forum.

Last edited by bkk145 on 14 Oct 2007, 17:55, edited 3 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1367

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Re: 690 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2007, 15:08
bkk145 wrote:
q50v32
In front of the center now using iPhone. More later.

So near yet so far!!

Congarts buddy...You did it...Its a decent score !!

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 901

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2007, 17:53
Just missed !!

It's a respectable Score.....

Congratulations!!

- Brajesh

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2554

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 0

Re: 690 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2007, 18:11
bkk145 wrote:
q50v32
In front of the center now using iPhone. More later.

Excellent score!!!

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 200

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2007, 18:32
Congrats man! 690 is a great score!

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 910

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Re: 690 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2007, 22:26
bkk145 wrote:
q50v32
In front of the center now using iPhone. More later.

a bit late but good job! lol.. you're probably still recuperating. but really looking forward to your debrief.. thanks for all your help and good luck with your apps!!

p.s. we will truly miss you in the verbal (notably) math discussion forums! sniff.. sniff.. but don't be a stranger to gmatclub

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 867

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 7

Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Re: 690 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2007, 23:04
bkk145 wrote:
q50v32
In front of the center now using iPhone. More later.

Congrats.

definitely very impressive score. you well deserve to be in 700+ club.
definitely there in next sit.

verbal is puller.

Goodluck

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 7

Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3350

Kudos [?]: 319 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2007, 08:56
I agree..you are 700+ guy...

verbal pulled you down...what happened???

Kudos [?]: 319 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 196

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2007, 11:52
Congratulations! Good score

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2554

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2007, 15:55
Ive noticed something rather strange with GMAT scores. A lot of people (who I think include myself) that usually do pretty well on the verbal during practice, bomb it during the real exam???

There is nothing shameful about a 690. But Bkk is not V32 material. Bkk deserves a much higher V than that.

I usually scored in the 37-39 for verbal, but come test day, I get slapped with a 31?

I don't remember the post but another person scored around 750+ on many of his or her CAT's. However when the real deal came, he/she was slapped with a 630... I can't recall the exact splits, but quant was high 48-50 or something and Verbal was low 29-30 something.

Im suggesting that the raw score splits are somewhat of a pattern of occurences. High quant low verbal on test day.

I have no idea why this is such a common occurance and I really can't say for sure that this is common, just speculating.

Any thoughts???

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1434

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2007, 17:57
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
Ive noticed something rather strange with GMAT scores. A lot of people (who I think include myself) that usually do pretty well on the verbal during practice, bomb it during the real exam???

There is nothing shameful about a 690. But Bkk is not V32 material. Bkk deserves a much higher V than that.

I usually scored in the 37-39 for verbal, but come test day, I get slapped with a 31?

I don't remember the post but another person scored around 750+ on many of his or her CAT's. However when the real deal came, he/she was slapped with a 630... I can't recall the exact splits, but quant was high 48-50 or something and Verbal was low 29-30 something.

Im suggesting that the raw score splits are somewhat of a pattern of occurences. High quant low verbal on test day.

I have no idea why this is such a common occurance and I really can't say for sure that this is common, just speculating.

Any thoughts???

Blackbelt, I agree with you on this. I have seen a lot of people that receive 4-5 points lower on the real exam. I am not sure why...

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 315

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2007, 19:03
bkk145 wrote:
Blackbelt, I agree with you on this. I have seen a lot of people that receive 4-5 points lower on the real exam. I am not sure why...

Did the verbal questions seem trickier than those in the OG11, GMATPrep, etc? Extremely tricky, slightly tricky, or mostly similar?

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2554

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2007, 19:18
gluon wrote:
bkk145 wrote:
Blackbelt, I agree with you on this. I have seen a lot of people that receive 4-5 points lower on the real exam. I am not sure why...

Did the verbal questions seem trickier than those in the OG11, GMATPrep, etc? Extremely tricky, slightly tricky, or mostly similar?

I can't say for BKK, but i didn't feel any difference at all from GMATPrep. Exam was practically identical.

This is why im so perplexed about this.

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2302

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 0

Schools: Darden

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2007, 20:20
I have a theory about this: fatigue. I recall the first time I took the test. I didn't sleep great the night before, got maybe 5 hours or so. I thought a little extra caffeine and sugar would help get me through the exam, so I drank coke (pretty normal for me) and at chocolate before the exam and during breaks (kind of unusual). Put it all together, the lack of sleep, caffeine, sugar & stress and by the time I got to the verbal section I had a pounding headache. My focus felt just a little bit off, and with about 10-15 minutes left, I couldn't wait to just be done with it, and even though I had plenty of time left I rushed through the last 6-8 verbal questions. The result was a V score about 5-7 points below my average practice scores - actually well lower than any verbal score I had seen in practice.

The second time around, more or less exactly 1 month later, I was well rested, had a better plan about what to eat and drink, and had a sense of calmness during the entire exam. I actually breezed through the verbal section with 20 minutes to spare, my focus was top notch that day and the answers seemed to pop out at me. I think think the key difference between the first and second tries was fatigue at the end of the test as influenced by stress, rest, and chemicals (caffeine, sugar).

So, if your observation about lower verbal breakdowns is correct, it would make sense because verbal is the last part of the exam and most likely to be influenced by test-taker fatigue. It's definitely important to work on endurance when you practice, get as much rest as possible (this may or may not be tough for some), and think about what you eat and drink on test day.

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2947

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2007, 22:38
I will second pelihu .

I suspect many people fall in the trap of 'skipping' the AWA during their practice routines. The extra one hour of AWA upfront really takes its toll on the back-end of the 'full' test.

Couple that with a poor night's sleep or abnormal levels of sugar and you get a surefire recipe for verbal disaster.

ps. Well done bkk on your score. Terrific improvement.

pelihu wrote:
I have a theory about this: fatigue. I recall the first time I took the test. I didn't sleep great the night before, got maybe 5 hours or so. I thought a little extra caffeine and sugar would help get me through the exam, so I drank coke (pretty normal for me) and at chocolate before the exam and during breaks (kind of unusual). Put it all together, the lack of sleep, caffeine, sugar & stress and by the time I got to the verbal section I had a pounding headache. My focus felt just a little bit off, and with about 10-15 minutes left, I couldn't wait to just be done with it, and even though I had plenty of time left I rushed through the last 6-8 verbal questions. The result was a V score about 5-7 points below my average practice scores - actually well lower than any verbal score I had seen in practice.

The second time around, more or less exactly 1 month later, I was well rested, had a better plan about what to eat and drink, and had a sense of calmness during the entire exam. I actually breezed through the verbal section with 20 minutes to spare, my focus was top notch that day and the answers seemed to pop out at me. I think think the key difference between the first and second tries was fatigue at the end of the test as influenced by stress, rest, and chemicals (caffeine, sugar).

So, if your observation about lower verbal breakdowns is correct, it would make sense because verbal is the last part of the exam and most likely to be influenced by test-taker fatigue. It's definitely important to work on endurance when you practice, get as much rest as possible (this may or may not be tough for some), and think about what you eat and drink on test day.

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 726

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 4

Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2007, 23:32
we should not do any thing different on exam day (except scoring better )

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 4

VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1434

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2007, 06:31
Friends,

I decided to give GMAT another try. Freshinha, you convinced me. I'll take it sometime in Jan. I'll send my 690 in first, then if I do better in Jan, I'll send the new score in. If not, I won't send it.

Long months ahead...

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2007, 07:47
I got a 690 on my GMAT yesterday as well ( Q44, V41). I experienced the exact opposite of the trend being discussed in this thread. On all my GMAT Prep exams i scored 47 or higher on Q and no more than 37 on the verbal. So on the actual exam the verbal ended up being higher and the Q lower.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1434

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2007, 07:57
cleanbold058 wrote:
I got a 690 on my GMAT yesterday as well ( Q44, V41). I experienced the exact opposite of the trend being discussed in this thread. On all my GMAT Prep exams i scored 47 or higher on Q and no more than 37 on the verbal. So on the actual exam the verbal ended up being higher and the Q lower.

Cleanbold,

Congrats on your score. I think higher V makes score go higher compare with the same increase in Q.
Q: Do you have problem with timing? Do you always finish the test?

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2007, 13:26
In Quantitative i tend to spend too much time on the first few questions and have to speed up and there are times when i don't feel in total control of the test. I would say i end up with like 15 min left for the last 10 questions.
Verbal i have no such problems. I tend to finish with 5 mins left most of the time.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

23 Oct 2007, 13:26

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Updated: Q50V32, 690 (90%)

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderator: EMPOWERgmatRichC

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.