Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 16:08 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 16:08

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92948
Own Kudos [?]: 619238 [25]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92948
Own Kudos [?]: 619238 [0]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92948
Own Kudos [?]: 619238 [0]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Jan 2020
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
Location: India
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation.
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Abhishek008 wrote:
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation.


Thank you, feedbacks are always welcome because they give us a chance to improve the quality of our questions. However, unless you mention why you consider this a poor quality question and why you do not agree with the explanation, not many constructive or corrective actions can be taken from our end.

Hence I would request you to elaborate more on your concerns, so that either we can explain to you in case you are going wrong in your thoughts or we can modify the question/explanation in case there is really a problem.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Apr 2021
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
I think this the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. Hi!
I marked second. Here is my take.

D & E are clearly wrong as they use "both" and there are no two things happening.
C would e wrong due to the usage of - "of"

Amongst A & B - A seems to be telling the family paid the cost whereas aren't we looking at saying it is something she paid?

You would verball agree to do something - as in this case pay. You don't verbally agree with someone.

Please help me understand where I am going wrong
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [3]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
nidhihiremath wrote:
I think this the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. Hi!
I marked second. Here is my take.

D & E are clearly wrong as they use "both" and there are no two things happening.
C would e wrong due to the usage of - "of"

Amongst A & B - A seems to be telling the family paid the cost whereas aren't we looking at saying it is something she paid?

You would verball agree to do something - as in this case pay. You don't verbally agree with someone.

Please help me understand where I am going wrong


Let's try to break up the second part in option A the following way:

Basic structure:
She agreed to pay the costs of studies.
With whom did she agree? With the rest of the family.
How did she agree? verbally (meaning, the agreemnt was verbal - there was no written agreement).

There is no problem with the above contsruction - the meaning is clearly conveyed.

Now looking at option B:

Basic structure:
She agreed to pay the costs of studies.
With whom did she agree? Not clear.
With whom did she (agree to) pay? With the rest of the family: wrong meaning, implying that the payment was to be done jointly, by her and her family.
How did she agree? verbally (meaning, the agreement was verbal, but with whom, not clear).

Thus meaning wise, option A is better than option B.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2022
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation. is agreed verbally preferred over verbally agreed?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 May 2022
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 30 [1]
Given Kudos: 174
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
why is the original sentence mentioned in option B? Bunuel sayantanc2k
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 May 2022
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Option A does not match underlined portion
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92948
Own Kudos [?]: 619238 [0]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
kavitaverma wrote:
why is the original sentence mentioned in option B? Bunuel sayantanc2k


AbhirupChatterjee wrote:
Option A does not match underlined portion


Fixed the issue. Thank you both!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 181
Own Kudos [?]: 101 [0]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
sayantanc2k wrote:
Abhishek008 wrote:
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation.


Thank you, feedbacks are always welcome because they give us a chance to improve the quality of our questions. However, unless you mention why you consider this a poor quality question and why you do not agree with the explanation, not many constructive or corrective actions can be taken from our end.

Hence I would request you to elaborate more on your concerns, so that either we can explain to you in case you are going wrong in your thoughts or we can modify the question/explanation in case there is really a problem.


Hi Sayantanc2k,
I chose option B, which I agree is incorrect. The issue, I have with option A, is it looks to mean that her agreement is that family is going to pay. This perhaps is because of placement of "to pay". With non-underlined part, it is pretty clear that she is the paying. B made sense to me since the "to pay" is placed next to the noun. B definitely alters the meaning of underlined part, however A alters the non-underlined part, which is a bigger sin.
Could you check few precedents in gmat official questions in order to give us an absolute clarity on our approach in the future.

Thanks for your help.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 May 2022
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 30 [0]
Given Kudos: 174
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
kavitaverma wrote:
why is the original sentence mentioned in option B? Bunuel sayantanc2k


AbhirupChatterjee wrote:
Option A does not match underlined portion


Fixed the issue. Thank you both!


There is still issue with the second half of options A and B. Bunuel
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92948
Own Kudos [?]: 619238 [0]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
kavitaverma wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
kavitaverma wrote:
why is the original sentence mentioned in option B? Bunuel sayantanc2k


AbhirupChatterjee wrote:
Option A does not match underlined portion


Fixed the issue. Thank you both!


There is still issue with the second half of options A and B. Bunuel


Thank you! Hope it's fine now.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2018
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Kindly explain what "Which" is referring back to?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Dec 2023
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
sayantanc2k wrote:
nidhihiremath wrote:
I think this the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. Hi!
I marked second. Here is my take.

D & E are clearly wrong as they use "both" and there are no two things happening.
C would e wrong due to the usage of - "of"

Amongst A & B - A seems to be telling the family paid the cost whereas aren't we looking at saying it is something she paid?

You would verball agree to do something - as in this case pay. You don't verbally agree with someone.

Please help me understand where I am going wrong


Let's try to break up the second part in option A the following way:

Basic structure:
She agreed to pay the costs of studies.
With whom did she agree? With the rest of the family.
How did she agree? verbally (meaning, the agreemnt was verbal - there was no written agreement).

There is no problem with the above contsruction - the meaning is clearly conveyed.

Now looking at option B:

Basic structure:
She agreed to pay the costs of studies.
With whom did she agree? Not clear.
With whom did she (agree to) pay? With the rest of the family: wrong meaning, implying that the payment was to be done jointly, by her and her family.
How did she agree? verbally (meaning, the agreement was verbal, but with whom, not clear).

Thus meaning wise, option A is better than option B.



sayantanc2k

what is "which" referring to ? please explain.....is it not referring to studies/study ?...and still using "which" is making sense?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: V02-37 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92948 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne