Last visit was: 28 Apr 2024, 19:58 It is currently 28 Apr 2024, 19:58

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Difficulty: 505-555 Levelx   Modifiersx            
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 1346
Own Kudos [?]: 5012 [106]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: New York City
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11184
Own Kudos [?]: 32025 [10]
Given Kudos: 291
Send PM
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [8]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
bmwhype2 wrote:
918. What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War was a special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls.
(A) What brought
(B) The thing that brought
(C) That which brought
(D) Bringing
(E) What has brought



"the thing","that" are incorrect/unnecessary prepositions.
Bringing is incorrect use of gerund.

A/E are left

What brought ......was special
What has brought.... was special => incorret

Go with A
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5185
Own Kudos [?]: 4658 [3]
Given Kudos: 633
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
abhishekmayank wrote:
Experts, could you tell me whether it is really a tense error in D :

Bringing the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War was a special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls.

Here "Bringing" is a gerund and it has no tense on its own.

The more simpler example :

Flying kite was a nice experience.

I don't think that simple gerund "Flying" is anyway interfering with the past tense of the sentence.

AjiteshArun
Hi abhishekmayank,

This is a pattern in English in which the subject is postposed while a part of the verb or verb phrase is moved to the front of the sentence.

1. Bringing the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War was a special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls.

is meant to be read as

2. A special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls was bringing the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War.
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 1346
Own Kudos [?]: 5012 [2]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: New York City
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Can you elaborate on the use of gerunds? All i know is gerunds are verbs that end in -ing and act as nouns. Not too sure about the application of gerunds in sentences...

Nevermind. I answered and figured out what was wrong.

Brought is a verb. Replacing it with a noun completely obliterates the sentence and makes it awkward.

vay wrote:
go with answer A.

What brought the company .........was a special .... is the correct usage.


Thanks. This explains why we didnt change the tense of brought. This rules out E, making A the only correct answer. :pa

Originally posted by bmwhype2 on 27 Jun 2007, 23:06.
Last edited by mvictor on 19 Mar 2018, 08:06, edited 3 times in total.
edit
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15269 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
nahid78 wrote:
Why D is wrong?

Can anyone please explain in more details?

"governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls."
How is this modifier work? ( structure)


Your query 1:
The main verb in the sentence is "was" - in option D there is no subject for this verb.

Your query 2:
"Increase" in a noun - "allowed" is a past participle referring to the noun.

The structure of the sentence in simplified form is:

What brought the company back was a price increase allowed during a period.
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15269 [3]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
rakaisraka wrote:
Hi,
The main verb in the sentence is "was" - in option D there is no subject for this verb. - In this isn't automobile industry the subject for was?
Can you please explain with an easy example plz.
Thanks


The following example replicates the issue exactly:

Option A: What brought him back was his love for her... "what brought him back" = subject, "was"= verb
Option D: Bringing him back was his love for her... would you say "him" is the subject for "was"?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 369
Own Kudos [?]: 824 [2]
Given Kudos: 646
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War was a special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls.

(A) What brought - perfect
(B) The thing that brought
(C) That which brought - that has no precedent
(D) Bringing - results in a fragment
(E) What has brought - the action of bringing automobile company from A to B is completed.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5185
Own Kudos [?]: 4658 [2]
Given Kudos: 633
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
SSM700plus wrote:
Hi sayantanc2k,

Could you please explain the structure of the sentence in terms of dependent and independent clause ??

What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War was a special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls.
Hi SSM700plus,

The sentence you mentioned is:
What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War was a special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls.

Here is the subject-verb combination that you are probably looking for:
What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War was a special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls.

1. The subject is what brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War. I recommend that you look at this construction as one big noun. What is a relative pronoun, and there is a relative (dependent) clause embedded in there, but knowing that is probably not going to be particularly useful.

2. The verb is was.

3. A special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls is just one big noun.

If you were wondering about the allowed in point (3), it is not a verb. It is a modifier for the noun increase.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 138
Own Kudos [?]: 100 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
bmwhype2 wrote:
918. What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War was a special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls.
(A) What brought
(B) The thing that brought
(C) That which brought
(D) Bringing
(E) What has brought


POE -

B - its not "thing"
C - that which - awkward construction
D - bringing - not a correct modifier
E - tense change

B, C, D, E - out

A - best choice.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2015
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [1]
Given Kudos: 80
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Option D above : from your example its clear that Him is not the subject , I think i got confused because sometimes gerund ( ING form of verbs) also act as subjects.
For example : Drinking water is expensive in europe , however it seems like in option D something lacks .. which is subject.
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1436
Own Kudos [?]: 4549 [1]
Given Kudos: 1228
Location: India
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
bmwhype2 wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 10th Edition, 2003

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 240
Page: 691

What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War was a special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls.

(A) What brought
(B) The thing that brought
(C) That which brought
(D) Bringing
(E) What has brought


(A) What brought - Correct.

(B) The thing that brought - The thing cannot be a sanctioned price.

(C) That which brought - No antecedent to 'That'.

(D) Bringing - Tense error. We need a past tense here.

(E) What has brought - Same as D.

Answer: A
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7629 [1]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
What we need to understand here is that the subject of the sentence is this noun clause – ‘what brought the automobile… World War…’

Let's look at the options:

Option E has the wrong tense. Eliminate.
Option D does not give you a complete sentence. Eliminate.
Option C – ‘that which’ can be written as ‘what’. Eliminate.
Option B – Not sure what ‘thing’ refers to. Eliminate.

Option A is the best choice.

Hope this helps!
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5185
Own Kudos [?]: 4658 [1]
Given Kudos: 633
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
abhishekmayank wrote:
Hi AjiteshArun,

While the issue of "postposed" would be at play over here, we can't take away the fact that a verb's present participle plays the role of a gerund and we can use it at the beginning of the sentence in place of a subject. Just another example :

Maintaining calm and tranquility in the panic situation is the responsibility of every citizen.

Whether we can read the sentence like this in the "postposed" structure ? Perhaps not, as it doesn't make any sense

The responsibility of every citizen is maintaining calm and tranquility in the panic situation


So, it could be the case that D is dubious in the sense that :

1. It is correct when "Bringing" is interpreted as gerund
2. It is incorrect when thought as "postposed" structure
You've asked some really good questions! For example, you've found an exception to the pattern in which we see a noun on the other side of the verb that works just as well as the subject. That is, X is Y and Y is X are not considered the same when Y is as good a subject as X is. The difference in this case is that using bringing as the subject leads to a meaning issue that cannot be overlooked.

1. Bringing the company back was a good move. ← "Bringing the company back" is the subject here, and it makes sense to say that it was "a good move" (bringing the company back = a good move).

2. Bringing the company back was a price increase. ← Forcing bringing to play the role of subject here will lead to a meaning issue (bringing the company back = a price increase).

English is full of patterns like this one. The main takeaway here is that the GMAT sometimes uses such unexpected structures to throw test takers off.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5185
Own Kudos [?]: 4658 [1]
Given Kudos: 633
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
chrtpmdr wrote:
Can someone explain why the usage of the present perfect is wrong here? Aren't we talking about a period of time in which the company has been brought back?
Hi chrtpmdr,

Consider the meaning of the sentence:
A price increase was what brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War.

Option E is:
A price increase was what has brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War.

The was (past tense) is in the non-underlined portion of the sentence, and it seems to indicate that we're looking at something that is in the past ("the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War"). Has brought seems to suggest that the automobile company has just been brought back (recently) from the verge of bankruptcy.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5185
Own Kudos [?]: 4658 [1]
Given Kudos: 633
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Taulark1 wrote:
Is option A correct because option A is just more concise and clearer than option B?

Hi Taulark1,

That's right. Option B is clear enough, but it's just a longer way to say the same thing as A, so we prefer A.
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 19 Jul 2022
Posts: 430
Own Kudos [?]: 507 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Tanchat wrote:
Dear Experts,
(B) is just "wordy" or is literally wrong due to "thing".


A "thing" is a physical object.

In informal, spoken English, people also routinely use "thing" to refer to abstract entities without a physical/material existence, such as people's words ("I just said the first thing that came to mind"), as well as to actions ("The first thing that we did was...").
These usages, however, are incorrect in formal written English.

In any case, don't be afraid to use unnecessary wordiness as a criterion for elimination! If there are other choices that express the same idea(s) more concisely, you can eliminate the unnecessarily wordy choice(s) for that reason.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 289
Own Kudos [?]: 606 [1]
Given Kudos: 1063
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
Why D is wrong?

Can anyone please explain in more details?

"governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls."
How is this modifier work? ( structure)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2015
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [1]
Given Kudos: 80
Send PM
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
sayantanc2k wrote:
Your query 1:
The main verb in the sentence is "was" - in option D there is no subject for this verb.

Your query 2:
"Increase" in a noun - "allowed" is a past participle referring to the noun.

The structure of the sentence in simplified form is:

What brought the company back was a price increase allowed during a period.



Hi,
The main verb in the sentence is "was" - in option D there is no subject for this verb. - In this isn't automobile industry the subject for was?
Can you please explain with an easy example plz.
Thanks
GMAT Club Bot
Re: What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne