Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 00:05 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 00:05

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 289
Own Kudos [?]: 606 [108]
Given Kudos: 1063
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 3480
Own Kudos [?]: 5137 [24]
Given Kudos: 1431
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [3]
Given Kudos: 55
Send PM
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1030
Own Kudos [?]: 1779 [1]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: A local bio-pharma startup [#permalink]
1
Kudos
this is a common pattern in gmat, test takers should learn this.

Both D and E are assumptions. Nevertheless, E does not fit the scope of this argument.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 141 [0]
Given Kudos: 275
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q48 V20
WE:Other (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: A local bio-pharma startup [#permalink]
Hello chesstitans would you please provide few questions on this pattern, the one you stated, that is used commonly.

Also could you please add a little more explanation to the learning that need to be inculcated for this pattern.
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1030
Own Kudos [?]: 1779 [0]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: A local bio-pharma startup [#permalink]
Prashant10692 wrote:
Hello chesstitans would you please provide few questions on this pattern, the one you stated, that is used commonly.

Also could you please add a little more explanation to the learning that need to be inculcated for this pattern.


learn the pattern is the short way to memorize the question.

There are approximately 2000 questions that are probable to appear in gmat, and those are good questions with great traps and clear explanations, but the verbal only has 41 questions. Certainly, most of the questions will come from those 2000 questions.
THIS IS THE PATTERN: The best way is to memorize all details for each question. Another way is to memorize the logic, and the main argument structure and the main idea from the passage. Then, memorize the how options are built to fit the questions.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jun 2017
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Send PM
Re: A local bio-pharma startup [#permalink]
Hi mikemcgarry Mahmud6
option D doesn't specifically mention that the main motive of the scientists is to earn money. It only says that they are not interested in pharma work. Then how does this strenthen the argument??
plz help.
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1030
Own Kudos [?]: 1779 [2]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: A local bio-pharma startup [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Hussain110 wrote:
Hi mikemcgarry Mahmud6
option D doesn't specifically mention that the main motive of the scientists is to earn money. It only says that they are not interested in pharma work. Then how does this strenthen the argument??
plz help.


Certainly, you must be sure that only B or D are candidates for the right answer.
D is an important pattern in Kaplan b/c D crosses out a possibility that managers are not motivated by double bonuses and salaries, but the differences. => D strengthens.
B is a trap b/c the argument talks about STANDARD of salaries and bonuses, while B discusses the performances and the bonuses. Also, B can both strengthen and weaken an argument.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28573 [4]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: A local bio-pharma startup [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Hussain110 wrote:
Hi mikemcgarry Mahmud6
option D doesn't specifically mention that the main motive of the scientists is to earn money. It only says that they are not interested in pharma work. Then how does this strenthen the argument??
plz help.

Dear Hussain110,

I see that chesstitans already responded, but I'm happy to add my two cents. :-)

I think this a poorly constructed question. (A) & (C) & (E) are clearly wrong. Choices (B) & (D) are both plausible but each has its problems: frankly, I would be hard-pressed to determine which is "better" of these two poor choices. Both are bad, and neither is up to the standards of a correct answer on the GMAT. This question does NOT model the kind of choices a student would make on the GMAT.

As for (D), even if the #1 highest priority of some of the best pharma managers is making a difference in the field of medicine, then there may be a few companies where this is a possibility, and one might as well go to the one that has the super-high salaries. Even if money is a #2 or #3 priority, paying an extremely high salary is still an excellent way to get very good people. Furthermore, if making that difference is not their highest priority, what is? Travel distance? Company culture? We don't know that automatically it would be money. (D) is very fuzzy.

This question does NOT have the clean feeling of an official GMAT CR question. The author, in trying to construct a tricky question, has produced a question without structural integrity.

Here's a high quality CR practice question:
According to Federal VA

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Jul 2016
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Send PM
Re: A local bio-pharma startup [#permalink]
1
Kudos
MartyMurray wrote:
The key to getting this one right is noticing that the conclusion is that this startup will produce the "best" results.

So there is a comparison going on. This startup is being compared with other companies in the same industry, and the only difference we have been told about, the difference that will make the results different, the best, is the fact the the science managers are going to be paid twice the industry standard.

So that pay difference is reason that this company is expected to be different from others.

(A) This does not somehow strengthen the connection between double pay and producing the best results. For one thing, for all we know, the managers at the other companies are also top engineers.

(B) The easiest way to eliminate B, and this type of answer shows up in a lot of GMAT CR questions, is that B does not talk about something that makes this startup different from others. Right? The point it that this startup is different, and for all we know at all such startups' managers' bonuses are based on performance.

Meanwhile, what B says does not directly or specifically strengthen the idea that paying double will likely generate the best results.

(C) As is the case with A and B, this neither differentiates the company nor directly strengthens the relationship between double pay and producing the best results.

(D) This is clearly related to the connection between paying double and getting the best results. If the primary motivation of the best science managers were not pay but rather making a difference, then one might not attract the best managers, or produce the best results, by simply paying double. So what this says eliminates a potential issue, strengthening the conclusion that paying double will result in producing the best results.

(E) This is tempting, in that one might think that in order for the plan to work, this company has to be able to get managers to move to it from other companies. However, there are many ways to get employees, and for all we know the employees of companies like this one are generally hired right out of school or from universities or something. Meanwhile, if managers were not able to move from company to company, other companies would face the same challenge. So what this choice says does not change the relationship between double pay and best results and is not clearly important for making the plan work.

The correct answer is .



for answer D, we can neither assume that money is the factor for manager. if we negate that making difference is the motivating factor for managers, then managers can still join the startup to make a difference there. i do not agree with your answer
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1030
Own Kudos [?]: 1779 [0]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: A local bio-pharma startup [#permalink]
Sushilait84 wrote:
MartyMurray wrote:
The key to getting this one right is noticing that the conclusion is that this startup will produce the "best" results.

So there is a comparison going on. This startup is being compared with other companies in the same industry, and the only difference we have been told about, the difference that will make the results different, the best, is the fact the the science managers are going to be paid twice the industry standard.

So that pay difference is reason that this company is expected to be different from others.

(A) This does not somehow strengthen the connection between double pay and producing the best results. For one thing, for all we know, the managers at the other companies are also top engineers.

(B) The easiest way to eliminate B, and this type of answer shows up in a lot of GMAT CR questions, is that B does not talk about something that makes this startup different from others. Right? The point it that this startup is different, and for all we know at all such startups' managers' bonuses are based on performance.

Meanwhile, what B says does not directly or specifically strengthen the idea that paying double will likely generate the best results.

(C) As is the case with A and B, this neither differentiates the company nor directly strengthens the relationship between double pay and producing the best results.

(D) This is clearly related to the connection between paying double and getting the best results. If the primary motivation of the best science managers were not pay but rather making a difference, then one might not attract the best managers, or produce the best results, by simply paying double. So what this says eliminates a potential issue, strengthening the conclusion that paying double will result in producing the best results.

(E) This is tempting, in that one might think that in order for the plan to work, this company has to be able to get managers to move to it from other companies. However, there are many ways to get employees, and for all we know the employees of companies like this one are generally hired right out of school or from universities or something. Meanwhile, if managers were not able to move from company to company, other companies would face the same challenge. So what this choice says does not change the relationship between double pay and best results and is not clearly important for making the plan work.

The correct answer is .



for answer D, we can neither assume that money is the factor for manager. if we negate that making difference is the motivating factor for managers, then managers can still join the startup to make a difference there. i do not agree with your answer


This is a strengthen question, not an assumption question, so the negation technique does not work. D is a strengthener b/c D eliminates one possibility. Among other option choices, B is the closest choice, but B is wrong. Many gmat questions have the pattern in B. That is to say, B only talks about how bonuses are based while the argument here concerns with how bonuses have impact on the results.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2021
Posts: 132
Own Kudos [?]: 48 [0]
Given Kudos: 1250
Location: Taiwan
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
Send PM
Re: A local bio-pharma startup [#permalink]
I wonder whether it is an official CR question as I found this question while watching a tutoring video.

I have two questions regarding this CR question:

1. Are we looking for an answer that provides the information supporting the PR prep's argument or the passage's final sentence?

I think that the final sentence is the conclusion of the passage, but the stem clearly asks us to support the prep's argument, which is a claim that offering salaries and bonuses double the industry standard should help attract the best science managers.

Some previous discussion focused on whether the startup would produce the best results, but if we are only concerned with the prep's argument, we do not need to mind the results at all.

2. Why is (B) wrong?

I think both (B) and (D) could support the prep's argument: (D) protects the argument by eliminating a possibility that the best science managers could be more interested in making a difference instead of making tons of money. (Although my real world sense tells me that most people in the startups aim to make a difference, however well they are paid.)

On the other hand, (B) specifies that the bonuses is based on managers' performance, measured by objective metrics. Since the prep already said that the company offers double bonuses to the managers, I connected the two dots and thought that the mangers' performance should be good even when measured objectively, otherwise how could the managers get bonuses twice the industry standard? So (B) somehow strengthens the argument by showing that the managers the company has hired are some of the best managers.

Thanks in advance if anyone could interchange ideas with me.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2020
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Send PM
Re: A local bio-pharma startup [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Simply said. There is a jump between the "double salary" and "best science manager" part. Like how can the bio company assures that the "best science manager" would work for the company just with the "double salary". By assuming that the "best science manager" only cares about $$$$ --> So D all the way
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17227
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: A local bio-pharma startup [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A local bio-pharma startup [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne