January 22, 2019 January 22, 2019 10:00 PM PST 11:00 PM PST In case you didn’t notice, we recently held the 1st ever GMAT game show and it was awesome! See who won a full GMAT course, and register to the next one. January 26, 2019 January 26, 2019 07:00 AM PST 09:00 AM PST Attend this webinar to learn how to leverage Meaning and Logic to solve the most challenging Sentence Correction Questions.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 21 Mar 2013
Posts: 38
GMAT Date: 03202014

Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at differe
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Dec 2013, 07:01
Question Stats:
60% (01:44) correct 40% (01:54) wrong based on 375 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at different constant rates. Alice, working alone, can complete the task in 21 hours. Is Alice's rate the slowest rate? (1) Barbara, working alone, can complete the task in 14 hours, and Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task. (2) Barbara and Cynia can complete the task in approximately 71% of the time taken for Alice and Barbara to complete the task.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4485

Re: Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at differe
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Dec 2013, 08:59
idinuv wrote: Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at different constant rates. Alice, working alone, can complete the task in 21 hours. Is Alice's rate the slowest rate?
(1) Barbara, working alone, can complete the task in 14 hours, and Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task.
(2) Barbara and Cynia can complete the task in approximately 71% of the time taken for Alice and Barbara to complete the task. Dear idinuv, I'm happy to help. You may find this article on work rate helpful: http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmatworkrateproblems/We know that A takes 21 hours to complete the job alone. From the prompt we know zilch about how she compares to B or C. Statement #1: Barbara, working alone, can complete the task in 14 hours, and Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task.OK, so first of all, they tell us that B takes only 14 hours, so B definitely works faster than A. Then we find out that B & C take less time than A & C, which means B & C works faster than A & C. Well, hmm. We already know, from the first part of this statement, that B works faster than A. From casual inspection, it's not clear that this second statement adds more information. We have to investigate it numerically, so we can involve that 86% figure, which is approximately 5/6. A finishes in 21 hours, so her rate (job/hours) is 1/21. B's rate is 1/14. Let's say C takes c hours, so C's rate is 1/c. For combinations of two people working together, we add rates. Rate of B & C = 1/14 + 1/c Rate of A & C = 1/21 + 1/c B & C take only 5/6 the time of A & C, which means B & C have 6/5 the rate of A & C. (1/14 + 1/c) = 6/5(1/21 + 1/c) At this point, we have a single equation we could solve for c. This is GMAT DS. The trap of DS would be to go through all the steps to find the numerical value of c. At this point, we see that we could solve for c. That's enough. If we knew c, we would know who was the fastest and slowest, and we would be able to answer the prompt question. This statement, alone and by itself, is sufficient. Statement #2: Barbara and Cynia can complete the task in approximately 71% of the time taken for Alice and Barbara to complete the taskHere, we have two unknowns, because we don't know C's rate or time, and we also don't know B's rate or time. Remember, B's rate is something given in statement #1, so we can't use it here. We would be able to set up a single equation, but one equation with two unknowns is not enough to solve, and we would still be left with questions. This statement, alone and by itself, is insufficient. Answer = (A)Does all this make sense? Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test Prep
Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)




SVP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1705
Concentration: Finance

Re: Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at differe
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Dec 2013, 06:13
mikemcgarry wrote: idinuv wrote: Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at different constant rates. Alice, working alone, can complete the task in 21 hours. Is Alice's rate the slowest rate?
(1) Barbara, working alone, can complete the task in 14 hours, and Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task.
(2) Barbara and Cynia can complete the task in approximately 71% of the time taken for Alice and Barbara to complete the task. Dear idinuv, I'm happy to help. You may find this article on work rate helpful: http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmatworkrateproblems/We know that A takes 21 hours to complete the job alone. From the prompt we know zilch about how she compares to B or C. Statement #1: Barbara, working alone, can complete the task in 14 hours, and Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task.OK, so first of all, they tell us that B takes only 14 hours, so B definitely works faster than A. Then we find out that B & C take less time than A & C, which means B & C works faster than A & C. Well, hmm. We already know, from the first part of this statement, that B works faster than A. From casual inspection, it's not clear that this second statement adds more information. We have to investigate it numerically, so we can involve that 86% figure, which is approximately 5/6. A finishes in 21 hours, so her rate (job/hours) is 1/21. B's rate is 1/14. Let's say C takes c hours, so C's rate is 1/c. For combinations of two people working together, we add rates. Rate of B & C = 1/14 + 1/c Rate of A & C = 1/21 + 1/c B & C take only 5/6 the time of A & C, which means B & C have 6/5 the rate of A & C. (1/14 + 1/c) = 6/5(1/21 + 1/c) At this point, we have a single equation we could solve for c. This is GMAT DS. The trap of DS would be to go through all the steps to find the numerical value of c. At this point, we see that we could solve for c. That's enough. If we knew c, we would know who was the fastest and slowest, and we would be able to answer the prompt question. This statement, alone and by itself, is sufficient. Statement #2: Barbara and Cynia can complete the task in approximately 71% of the time taken for Alice and Barbara to complete the taskHere, we have two unknowns, because we don't know C's rate or time, and we also don't know B's rate or time. Remember, B's rate is something given in statement #1, so we can't use it here. We would be able to set up a single equation, but one equation with two unknowns is not enough to solve, and we would still be left with questions. This statement, alone and by itself, is insufficient. Answer = (A)Does all this make sense? Mike Well done Mike Cheers! J



Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2015
Posts: 256
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
WE: Investment Banking (Venture Capital)

Re: Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at differe
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Mar 2018, 12:31
I may have a quicker way to solve (experts please chime in):
We know A's rate but don't know B's rate and C's rate. Further, we're asked if A is the slowest. To make this determination, we need to find B's rate and C's rate.
(1) B's rate is defined. Then, we're given: (B+C) = (.86)(A+C). We have 3 variables here. However, we know what "B" is, and "C" should be the same value that we are adding to either side. Due to this, we can theoretically get "A".  AD in, BCE out.
(2) (B+C) = (.71)(A+B). We don't know what any of the variables are. I suppose we can rationalize that C = (.71)(A). Even so, depending on what "plug" you use for A or C, you can get different answers. D out.
A remains.
Kudos please if helpful and corrections please if I am incorrect in my thinking.



GMATH Teacher
Status: GMATH founder
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Posts: 629

Re: Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at differe
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Oct 2018, 15:03
idinuv wrote: Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at different constant rates. Alice, working alone, can complete the task in 21 hours. Is Alice's rate the slowest rate?
(1) Barbara, working alone, can complete the task in 14 hours, and Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task.
(2) Barbara and Cynia can complete the task in approximately 71% of the time taken for Alice and Barbara to complete the task. Obs.: the term approximately invalidates the question because we know NOTHING about the approximation precision. (What should be considered "near" 86%, for instance?) We will consider equality in both cases, with the following (not problematic) aside: the numbers b and c (below) may be nonintegers. Let´s imagine the task is defined by 42 identical units of job (from now on simply "units"). Alice (A) can do 2 units/h (therefore in 21h she will do 2*21 = 42 units, i.e., the task). Barbara (B) can do (say) b units/h Cynia (C) can do (say) c units/h \(2\,\,\mathop < \limits^? \,\,\,\min \left( {b,c} \right)\) \(\left( 1 \right)\,\,\left\{ \matrix{ b = 3 \hfill \cr \,{{{T_{B \cup C}}} \over {{T_{A \cup C}}}} = {{43} \over {50}}\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{W = \,{\rm{work}}\,{\rm{rate}}} \,\,\,\,\,{{3 + c} \over {2 + c}} = {{{W_{B \cup C}}} \over {{W_{A \cup C}}}} = {{50} \over {43}} \hfill \cr} \right.\) \({{3 + c} \over {2 + c}} = {{50} \over {43}}\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,c\,\,{\rm{unique}}\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,{\rm{SUFF}}.\) \(\left( 2 \right)\,\,\,{{{T_{B \cup C}}} \over {{T_{A \cup B}}}} = {{71} \over {100}}\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{W = \,{\rm{work}}\,{\rm{rate}}} \,\,\,\,\,{{b + c} \over {2 + b}} = {{100} \over {71}}\) \(\left\{ \matrix{ \,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {b;c} \right) = \left( {1;{{300} \over {71}}  1} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \hfill \cr \,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {b;c} \right) = \left( {3;{{500} \over {71}}  3} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \hfill \cr} \right.\) This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method. Regards, Fabio.
_________________
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator (Math for the GMAT) Our highlevel "quant" preparation starts here: https://gmath.net




Re: Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at differe &nbs
[#permalink]
13 Oct 2018, 15:03






