GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 23 Sep 2018, 23:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Although modern science has essentially eradicated the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 10 Apr 2011
Posts: 36

### Show Tags

Updated on: 31 Aug 2017, 20:49
2
11
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

47% (00:53) correct 53% (01:13) wrong based on 459 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Although modern science has essentially eradicated the bubonic plague from the industrialized word, the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease.

A. the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease
B. an occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease once in every few years
C. the disease will be diagonsed in the occasional patient once in every few years
D. every few years the occasional patient will be diagonsed with the disease
E. every few years the occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease

I understand the answer, but the question I have here is if we should use "if the occasional patient will be diagonsed" rather than use "the disease will be diagonsed"?
Thanks.

_________________

Yvonne Hao

Originally posted by yvonne0923 on 11 May 2011, 22:47.
Last edited by broall on 31 Aug 2017, 20:49, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1096

### Show Tags

11 May 2011, 23:13
should be -- definitive

meaning patients are definitely diagnosed with the plague.This is not the case though. The second clause is an observation/future statement.
yvonne0923 wrote:
Although modern science has essentially eradicated the bubonic plague from the industrialized word, the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease.

A. the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease -- should be... few years with the disease -- POE.
B. an occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease once in every few years -- once in few years, should be POE.

C. the disease will be diagonsed in the occasional patient once in every few years -- the disease will be diagnosed --wrong usage. POE.
D. every few years the occasional patient will be diagonsed with the disease -- correct usage of will be and every few years.
E. every few years the occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease -- should be ..POE.

______________________________________________________________________
I understand the answer, but the question I have here is if we should use "if the occasional patient will be diagonsed" rather than use "the disease will be diagonsed"?
Thanks.

_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1096

### Show Tags

11 May 2011, 23:18
what you are saying is essentially --

C. In a patient,the disease will be diagnosed after every few years.

D. After every few years,a patient (different once) will be diagnosed with the disease.

D meaning is clear and better.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 523

### Show Tags

11 May 2011, 23:24
amit2k9 wrote:
should be -- definitive

meaning patients are definitely diagnosed with the plague.This is not the case though. The second clause is an observation/future statement.
yvonne0923 wrote:
Although modern science has essentially eradicated the bubonic plague from the industrialized word, the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease.

A. the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease -- should be... few years with the disease -- POE.
B. an occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease once in every few years -- once in few years, should be POE.

C. the disease will be diagonsed in the occasional patient once in every few years -- the disease will be diagnosed --wrong usage. POE.
D. every few years the occasional patient will be diagonsed with the disease -- correct usage of will be and every few years.
E. every few years the occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease -- should be ..POE.

______________________________________________________________________
I understand the answer, but the question I have here is if we should use "if the occasional patient will be diagonsed" rather than use "the disease will be diagonsed"?
Thanks.

I thought Should = recommendation or advise or suggestion
Will = 100% future.
Is 'will' required?
arent we suggesting that the occasional patent be diagonsed with disease?
Intern
Joined: 10 Apr 2011
Posts: 36

### Show Tags

11 May 2011, 23:38
Except the idiomatic error of "once in every few years" in choice C, are there any problems of correct usage of "the occasional patient will be diagonsed" and " the disease will be diagonsed"? I still don't get why the answer is D instead of C.

amit2k9 wrote:
should be -- definitive

meaning patients are definitely diagnosed with the plague.This is not the case though. The second clause is an observation/future statement.
yvonne0923 wrote:
Although modern science has essentially eradicated the bubonic plague from the industrialized word, the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease.

A. the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease -- should be... few years with the disease -- POE.
B. an occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease once in every few years -- once in few years, should be POE.

C. the disease will be diagonsed in the occasional patient once in every few years -- the disease will be diagnosed --wrong usage. POE.
D. every few years the occasional patient will be diagonsed with the disease -- correct usage of will be and every few years.
E. every few years the occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease -- should be ..POE.

______________________________________________________________________
I understand the answer, but the question I have here is if we should use "if the occasional patient will be diagonsed" rather than use "the disease will be diagonsed"?
Thanks.

_________________

Yvonne Hao

Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 94

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2011, 10:34
I thnk is because you diagnost a person, not the disease.
Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 544

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2011, 19:06
1
+1 for D.

1) Indicator of moral obligation : He should go home.
2) Used as Hypothetical subjunctive (less common in GMAT): Should he fail the exam, he will have to leave the college.

None of the usages fit out sentence, hence should is not the correct word => A, B and E out.

Crick
Manager
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 53

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2012, 19:59
Although modern science has essentially eradicated the bubonic plague from the industrialized word, the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease.

A. the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease - Should is wrong
B. an occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease once in every few years - Should is wrong
C. the disease will be diagonsed in the occasional patient once in every few years - DIsease diagnosed ?? Its the patient who is diagnosed.
D. every few years the occasional patient will be diagonsed with the disease
E. every few years the occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease - Should
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2683
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2016, 08:08
yvonne0923 wrote:
Although modern science has essentially eradicated the bubonic plague from the industrialized word, the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease.

A. the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease
B. an occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease once in every few years
C. the disease will be diagonsed in the occasional patient once in every few years
D. every few years the occasional patient will be diagonsed with the disease
E. every few years the occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease

should be - oh my god, really? NO!
another mistake - ONCE... why once?
A, B, C, and D are eliminated right away!
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 242
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147

### Show Tags

05 May 2017, 21:36
Hi expert,
I don't understand why "should be" is wrong?
Isn't it a suggestion that one should perform checkup,although the plague has been eradicated?

Thanks
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1302

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2017, 17:59
2
D is definitely the best of the bunch. A, B, and E are immediately out because of "should." Surely the author doesn't think that people should be diagnosed with the plague!

C improves on all those, but there's a bit of redundancy. "The occasional patient" means one patient here or there, so we don't need "once in every few years." (The use of "in" there is also not idiomatic.)

D fixes the above problems without introducing any errors. "The occasional X" is a standard idiom: "I don't eat a lot of sweets, but I've been known to eat the occasional cookie." "An occasional" is actually wrong. Outside of this idiom, we wouldn't refer to a person as "occasional" unless we are saying that they occasionally serve in a particular role: "Shanna is an occasional guest on Meet the Press."
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Manager
Joined: 11 Mar 2017
Posts: 53
Location: India
Schools: SMU '19 (A), LBS
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V33
GPA: 3.3

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2018, 03:36
DmitryFarber wrote:
D is definitely the best of the bunch. A, B, and E are immediately out because of "should." Surely the author doesn't think that people should be diagnosed with the plague!

C improves on all those, but there's a bit of redundancy. "The occasional patient" means one patient here or there, so we don't need "once in every few years." (The use of "in" there is also not idiomatic.)

D fixes the above problems without introducing any errors. "The occasional X" is a standard idiom: "I don't eat a lot of sweets, but I've been known to eat the occasional cookie." "An occasional" is actually wrong. Outside of this idiom, we wouldn't refer to a person as "occasional" unless we are saying that they occasionally serve in a particular role: "Shanna is an occasional guest on Meet the Press."

Can we also eliminate C on basis that The person is diagnosed with disease not the disease is diagnosed in person( illogical as stated in C)?
VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1169
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2018, 10:37
yvonne0923 wrote:
Although modern science has essentially eradicated the bubonic plague from the industrialized word, the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease.

A. the occasional patient should be diagonsed every few years with the disease
B. an occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease once in every few years
C. the disease will be diagonsed in the occasional patient once in every few years
D. every few years the occasional patient will be diagonsed with the disease
E. every few years the occasional patient should be diagonsed with the disease

I understand the answer, but the question I have here is if we should use "if the occasional patient will be diagonsed" rather than use "the disease will be diagonsed"?
Thanks.

There is a contrast in the sentence.
The bubonic plague is eradicated from the industrialist world but still we will see some patients with bubonic plague occasionally in few years.
D is correct as it conveys the correct meaning .
_________________

Re: Although modern science has essentially eradicated the &nbs [#permalink] 08 Feb 2018, 10:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Although modern science has essentially eradicated the

## Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.