Are positive integers p and q both greater than n ?

Question

(1) p - q is greater than n
(2) q > p

Bunuel · Answer

Given:  p=integer>0  and  q=integer>0 . 
Question: is  p>n  and  q>n ?

(1)  p-q>n . Clearly insufficient.

(2)  q>p , no info about  n . Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Sum (1) and (2) (we can safely do this as their signs are in the same direction):  p-q+q>n+p  -->  n<0 . As given that both  p  and  q  are positive then they are greater than negative  n . Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Matt1177 · Answer

(i) Clearly, not sufficient;
(ii) Clearly, not sufficient.

Taken together:
We can subtract two inequalities with different signs:
p-q > n -----p > n+q
q > p -------p < q
Subtract and get 0 > n

Since n is less than zero and p and q are positive integers, then obviously n < p or q

AmrithS · Answer

Are p and q both greater than n? (1) p - q is greater than n (2) q>p EDIT: p and q are positive integers.... I missed that part

Sorry!

stanford2012 · Answer

Are you sure the correct answer is C?

Let's do two cases for which the stated conditions hold.

Case 1: p= 2, q=3
From condition 1 it follows that n < -1, i.e. n is smaller than both p and q.

Case 2: p=-3, q=-2

From condition 1 it follows that n <-1, i.e. it is unclear whether n is smaller or larger than p and q.

Unless the question states that p and q are positive (integers) I think the correct solution is E (not C).

MHIKER · Answer

Your approach is too good

mbafall2011 · Answer

I second that! In my attempt to solve it i did a whole bunch of things but this was the easiest!

subhashghosh · Answer

From 1) p-q is greater than n

=> p-n > q (a +ve value) so p > n, but nothing can be inferred about q, so (1) is not sufficient.

From (2) q > p but nothing is given about n, so (2) is not sufficient.

So combining (1) and (2) we can see that q > p > n.

Answer is C.

mourinhogmat1 · Answer

1. A is insufficient because we know p-q>n. This means p>n but q need not be greater than n. We have no further information on q. e.g. 5-2 > 2 but here q = n. So, rule out A.

2. B is insufficient as no information is given on n. So, we can't compare n to p and q.

Together C: we know that q-p MUST be negative and that makes n negative. Since p and q are positive integers its sufficient to answer the question that BOTH p and Q are greater than n.

I suppose the mistake you made is that you didn't read the key word POSITIVE INTEGERS.

yannichc · Answer

after eliminating the two statements we can line them up

p-q-n>0
q-p>0

adding them together we get

-n>0 , therfore n <0

since we know p and q are positive integers, we know that both p and q are greater than n

or

p-q>n
q>p

p>n+p

0>n

therefore P and Q both > n

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Are positive integers p and q both greater than n ?

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards