Last visit was: 13 Dec 2024, 16:47 It is currently 13 Dec 2024, 16:47
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,507
Own Kudos:
31,795
 []
Given Kudos: 667
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 4,507
Kudos: 31,795
 []
19
Kudos
Add Kudos
57
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,507
Own Kudos:
31,795
 []
Given Kudos: 667
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 4,507
Kudos: 31,795
 []
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
dentobizz
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Last visit: 12 Jun 2021
Posts: 402
Own Kudos:
1,890
 []
Given Kudos: 370
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Posts: 402
Kudos: 1,890
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MOKSH
Joined: 01 Dec 2012
Last visit: 21 Sep 2019
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
116
 []
Given Kudos: 8
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GPA: 2.9
Products:
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO:E

Between 2000 and 2010( MISPLACED MODIFIER , CONFUSED MEANING AS IT SEEMS MODIFYING THE " THE $ 10.7 BILLION SKI & SNOWBOARDING INDUSTRY), the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, with centers in 38 states ( NONSENSICAL TO SAY WITH CENTERS IN 38 STATES) and which (IT SEEMS REFER TO STATES , BUT MEANING WISE IT SHOULD REFER TO INDUSTRY) employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, lost $1.07 billion in revenue, owing to the warming trend that forces half the nation’s ski areas to open late and almost half to close early.

A. Between 2000 and 2010, the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, with centers in 38 states and which employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, lost (INCORRECT AS EXPLAINED IN ORIGINAL SENTENCE)
B. The $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, with centers in 38 states and employing 187,000 people directly or indirectly between 2000 and 2010, lost (INCORRECT AS EXPLAINED IN ORIGINAL SENTENCE)
C. Between 2000 and 2010, the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, which has centers in 38 states and which employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly,, losing ( MEANING CHANGED , NO VERB FOR SUBJECT " THE $ 10.7 BILLION SKI & SNOWBOARDING INDUSTRY ") (INCORRECT)
D. The $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry between 2000 and 2010, with centers in 38 states and employing 187,000 people directly or indirectly, losing(MEANING CHANGED , NO VERB FOR SUBJECT " THE $ 10.7 BILLION SKI & SNOWBOARDING INDUSTRY ") (INCORRECT)
E. The $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, which has centers in 38 states and employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, lost, between 2000 and 2010,,(CORRECT)
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,507
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 667
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 4,507
Kudos: 31,795
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for your responses guys. We will be posting the solutions soon :). Meanwhile, do use the poll functionality to select the correct answer choice.
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,606
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,678
Posts: 4,606
Kudos: 34,758
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A is my choice.

E is too convoluted

regards
User avatar
TGC
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Last visit: 19 Jul 2017
Posts: 582
Own Kudos:
3,353
 []
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
Posts: 582
Kudos: 3,353
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Between 2000 and 2010, the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, with centers in 38 states and which employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, lost
Incorrect placement of "which".
B. The $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, with centers in 38 states and employing 187,000 people directly or indirectly between 2000 and 2010, lost
"With centers" is not || with "employing"
C. Between 2000 and 2010, the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, which has centers in 38 states and which employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, losing
"losing" creates a issue.It should have been a past tense
D. The $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry between 2000 and 2010, with centers in 38 states and employing 187,000 people directly or indirectly, losing
Same issue as "C".
E. The $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, which has centers in 38 states and employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, lost, between 2000 and 2010,
This is correct in meaning as author wants to say that there was a loss between 2000-2010,so to clarify this is moves lost before the time frame so as to symbolize that loss was between 2000-2010.
User avatar
PrashantPonde
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Last visit: 28 Nov 2024
Posts: 323
Own Kudos:
2,573
 []
Given Kudos: 185
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 323
Kudos: 2,573
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I believe choice(E) has better construction. Choice(A) has parallelism issues with the use of with/which clauses.

E for me...
User avatar
bagdbmba
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Last visit: 10 Dec 2021
Posts: 1,006
Own Kudos:
4,113
 []
Given Kudos: 156
Posts: 1,006
Kudos: 4,113
 []
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great qs. e-gmat..but it's pretty easy I think 8-)

OA:E

Look forward to seeing some tougher ones in this category from you guys and hope you'll come up soon with some marvelous SC topics like those in 2012... Can't wait for them:)

P.S: added this Qs. in my post that contains all your SC topics discussed as on date in the forum.
User avatar
kuttingchai
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Last visit: 17 Oct 2016
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
434
 []
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 127
Kudos: 434
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was down to A & E - but selected "A" for the reason below - now i think i am wrong - it should have been "E"

My analysis on option "A"

Between 2000 and 2010, the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, with centers in 38 states and which employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, lost $1.07 billion in revenue, owing to the warming trend that forces half the nation’s ski areas to open late and almost half to close early.

Subject: the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry
Verb: lost

-verbing modifier will modify the preceding clause, which in this case is the main clause
"the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry lost $1.07 billion in revenue"

-- I totally missed this part - "with centers in 38 states and which employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly" - is not parallel

--------------------------------------------------------

My analysis on option "E"

The $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, which has centers in 38 states and employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, lost, between 2000 and 2010,$1.07 billion in revenue, owing to the warming trend that forces half the nation’s ski areas to open late and almost half to close early.

Subject: the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry
Verb: lost

-verbing modifier will modify the preceding clause, which in this case is the main clause
"the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry lost $1.07 billion in revenue"

Subordinate clause -
which has centers in 38 states and employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly
Subject: which referes - the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry
verb : has centers & employs
avatar
bluemints
Joined: 23 Dec 2012
Last visit: 24 Dec 2013
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
22
 []
Given Kudos: 131
Status:getting there
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Tuck '16
Schools: Tuck '16
Posts: 29
Kudos: 22
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
boils down to A vs E

E has one apparent error

The $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, which has centers in 38 states and employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, lost, between 2000 and 2010,$1.07 billion in revenue, owing to the warming trend that forces half the nation’s ski areas to open late and almost half to close early.

What is between 2000-2010 doing after Verb LOST. It appears that 2000-2010 $$ are lost whereas the ACTUAL quantity $1.07 billion should be placed next to Lost
NOTE- between 2000 and 2010 is NOT followed by Year 2000-2010 (the actual intended meaning) . so ambiguity remains.

A seems fine except the modifier with the lack of // structure

,with centers in 38 states (prepositional ph.)and which employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly(relative/adj clause),
But I guess since it is a modifier placed between comma we can ignore this

So A for me
User avatar
souvik101990
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 09 Nov 2024
Posts: 4,327
Own Kudos:
52,170
 []
Given Kudos: 2,326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
Posts: 4,327
Kudos: 52,170
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
Try this difficult question fresh from the e-GMAT bakery!

Between 2000 and 2010, the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, with centers in 38 states and which employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, lost $1.07 billion in revenue, owing to the warming trend that forces half the nation’s ski areas to open late and almost half to close early.
A. Between 2000 and 2010, the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, with centers in 38 states and which employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, lost
B. The $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, with centers in 38 states and employing 187,000 people directly or indirectly between 2000 and 2010, lost
C. Between 2000 and 2010, the $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, which has centers in 38 states and which employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, losing
D. The $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry between 2000 and 2010, with centers in 38 states and employing 187,000 people directly or indirectly, losing
E. The $10.7 billion ski and snowboarding industry, which has centers in 38 states and employs 187,000 people directly or indirectly, lost, between 2000 and 2010,

Want to practice 50+ meaning based questions? Register here at e-GMAT

OA & detailed solution coming up later!!
Cool Question e-GMAT.
Let me try on this one. Now I just woke up so please be easy on me if I am wrong!
E. between 2000 and 2010 is awkwardly placed after lost. Not sure about E (cant find a concrete reason to discard it)
D. D is not a complete sentence. The core of the sentence is "the ski and snowboarding industry losing revenue.
C. Same error as D. C is also a fragment.
B has a modifier error. I means that the industry emplys 187,000 people in the years 2000-10. That is not the intended meaning. In those years the industry lost revenue.
A. Correct. No apparent errors.
avatar
Gulfsbb
Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Last visit: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 03-11-2013
GPA: 3.8
WE:Supply Chain Management (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Posts: 3
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
So, what is the correct answer? E?
Please...my brain is melting.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,507
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 667
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 4,507
Kudos: 31,795
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks every one for participating in this question/poll.

Here are the statistics for this question:





Number of responses - 23
52% people answered this question correctly.
The tussle was between choices A and E. There were 39% votes for Choice A.

Regards,

Shraddha
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,507
Own Kudos:
31,795
 []
Given Kudos: 667
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 4,507
Kudos: 31,795
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most of you were able to reject choices BCD very easily. The conflict was really between choices A and E. This kind of scenario is pretty common for difficult questions.

The thing that threw you off was the placement of modifier "between 2000 and 2010" between a set of commas. Let's just look at the construction of main parts of choice E.

The ski and snowboarding industry lost, between 2000 and 2010, $1.07 billion in revenue.
Basically we have two pieces of information for the verb "lost" - the when and the what?
When has been answered by the modifier - between 2000 and 2010
What has been answered by the phrase - $1.07 billion in revenue

And in order to express these two bits of information, comma pair has been used to separate one information from another.

Now could we have written this in some other manner? Sure we could have. Here are the two ways in which we could have positioned this information:

1: The ski and snowboarding industry lost between 2000 and 2010 $1.07 billion in revenue. - Although there is nothing wrong with this construction, as a writer I feel more comfortable separating out the "between 2000 and 2010" within a comma pair. Such separation aids in better readability of the sentence.
2: Between 2000 and 2010, the ski and snowboarding industry lost $1.07 billion in revenue. - This is similar to choice A. And we could have created an answer choice in which we corrected the parallelism error of choice A. But then you would not have learned such aspect about comma pairs!! :) And then the question would not have been truly 700+ level question.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Shraddha
User avatar
souvik101990
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 09 Nov 2024
Posts: 4,327
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
Posts: 4,327
Kudos: 52,170
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
Most of you were able to reject choices BCD very easily. The conflict was really between choices A and E. This kind of scenario is pretty common for difficult questions.

The thing that threw you off was the placement of modifier "between 2000 and 2010" between a set of commas. Let's just look at the construction of main parts of choice E.

The ski and snowboarding industry lost, between 2000 and 2010, $1.07 billion in revenue.
Basically we have two pieces of information for the verb "lost" - the when and the what?
When has been answered by the modifier - between 2000 and 2010
What has been answered by the phrase - $1.07 billion in revenue

And in order to express these two bits of information, comma pair has been used to separate one information from another.

Now could we have written this in some other manner? Sure we could have. Here are the two ways in which we could have positioned this information:

1: The ski and snowboarding industry lost between 2000 and 2010 $1.07 billion in revenue. - Although there is nothing wrong with this construction, as a writer I feel more comfortable separating out the "between 2000 and 2010" within a comma pair. Such separation aids in better readability of the sentence.
2: Between 2000 and 2010, the ski and snowboarding industry lost $1.07 billion in revenue. - This is similar to choice A. And we could have created an answer choice in which we corrected the parallelism error of choice A. But then you would not have learned such aspect about comma pairs!! :) And then the question would not have been truly 700+ level question.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Shraddha
Shraddha, thanks so much for the detailed analysis!
BTW is this sentence illogical?
The science book, with a lot of pictorial illustration and which is written by Stephen Hawking was the reason I got into physics.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,507
Own Kudos:
31,795
 []
Given Kudos: 667
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 4,507
Kudos: 31,795
 []
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Now here comes my personalized response to all of you who provided their analysis for this question.

I see some common themes in the response so I will spell those out here.

@dentobizz - you could figure out the parallelism error in choice A but you still marked choice A as the correct answer since you felt that the construction of choice E was not correct. I hope my explanation above helps you clarify that doubt.

@bluemints - You also could identify the parallelism error in choice A but like dentobizz you also marked choice A. Now you added one more comment in your analysis and that bothered me a bit - you cannot ignore a grammatical error in the portion of the sentence that is within the comma pair. Each and every part of the sentence should be grammatically and logically intact. I am not sure how you got this impression that you can ignore the portion of the sentence in the comma pair. Any thoughts?

@Moksh - You selected the correct answer. But your explanation for why choice A is wrong is not correct. There is nothing wrong with the placement of "Between 2000 and 2010" in choice A. It correctly modifies the action - lost.

@targetgmatchotu - likewise you also selected the correct answer. But your explanation for why choice A is wrong is not correct. There is nothing wrong with placement of "which" modifier. Notice the presence of "and" before which. This implies that this is part of the list of modifiers of the preceding noun - industry. Now your rationale would have been correct if "and" was not there in the sentence. Then "which" would have modified the preceding noun "states".

@debayan - I am glad you could arrive at the correct answer E. And thanks for including this post in your collection of e-GMAT articles. I would have loved to see your explanation for this question. In any case, please make sure that you review the official explanation for this question.

@kuttingchai - Great job at your analysis of choice A!

@souvik101990 - You could not find anything wrong with choice E since there isn't anything wrong with it. But yes definitely choice A has the parallelism error.

I hope I have not missed anyone else who gave a detailed response to this question.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,507
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 667
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 4,507
Kudos: 31,795
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
souvik101990
Shraddha, thanks so much for the detailed analysis!
BTW is this sentence illogical?
The science book, with a lot of pictorial illustration and which is written by Stephen Hawking was the reason I got into physics.

You are most welcome Souvik.
First of all this sentence is not grammatically correct. The list is not parallel. Secondly, I would not say that it is illogical, but it does not communicate the message very clearly. Logically speaking one of Stephen Hawking book's that contained pictorial illustrations would be the reason the author got into Physics. Is that correct? Now that logical meaning is not communicated very well by this sentence.
User avatar
souvik101990
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 09 Nov 2024
Posts: 4,327
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
Posts: 4,327
Kudos: 52,170
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
souvik101990
Shraddha, thanks so much for the detailed analysis!
BTW is this sentence illogical?
The science book, with a lot of pictorial illustration and which is written by Stephen Hawking was the reason I got into physics.

You are most welcome Souvik.
First of all this sentence is not grammatically correct. The list is not parallel. Secondly, I would not say that it is illogical, but it does not communicate the message very clearly. Logically speaking one of Stephen Hawking book's that contained pictorial illustrations would be the reason the author got into Physics. Is that correct? Now that logical meaning is not communicated very well by this sentence.

Well 2 things!
It would be exactly what you said if you used the article "a" instead of "the" in the opening of the sentence.
The sentence mean The science book was the reason and the other stuffs are just additional info to the book I am talking about and not the reason behind being the reason.
If I had said "a" I would mean its one of the books by stephen hawking with pictorial stuffs which would make no sense.
But since I used "the" I am talking about a particular book. And "with pictorial illustrations" and "which is written by S. Hawking" are two things that describe the book and provides additional information. Yeah its wrong because they are not parallel. But I thought "the book with pictorial illustrations" and "the book which is written by S. Hawking" could be parallel.
User avatar
dentobizz
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Last visit: 12 Jun 2021
Posts: 402
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 370
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Posts: 402
Kudos: 1,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
@dentobizz - you could figure out the parallelism error in choice A but you still marked choice A as the correct answer since you felt that the construction of choice E was not correct. I hope my explanation above helps you clarify that doubt.

Hi Shraddha,
Thanks for posting both challenging questions and the explanations
But I still feel that Placement of 'between 2000 to 2010' after 'lost' makes the meaning ambiguous. LOST b/w 2000-2010 dollars?? people?? no quantifier is mentioned

if it were 'between the year 2000 to 2010' then it would have been clear.

That why I didn't choose E since I didn't feel it was the best option

Do we choose E just because the other 4 options are grammatically inaccurate?

Thanks
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7161 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts