Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 00:38 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 00:38

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Poor Qualityx      
Show Tags
Hide Tags
SC Moderator
Joined: 25 Sep 2018
Posts: 1122
Own Kudos [?]: 2209 [6]
Given Kudos: 1665
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.97
WE:Investment Banking (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Sep 2018
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2020
Posts: 53
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 83
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2015
Posts: 96
Own Kudos [?]: 46 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
GRE 1: Q158 V143
Send PM
Re: Capturing carbon dioxide and turning it into commercial products, [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I am quite skeptical regarding the answer choice C. First bold statement cant be an evidence. Author makes an assumption that each utilization pathway could use around 0.5 giga tonnes of carbon dioxide. Assumptions are not evidences
Current Student
Joined: 16 Jan 2019
Posts: 631
Own Kudos [?]: 1444 [0]
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
WE:Sales (Other)
Send PM
Re: Capturing carbon dioxide and turning it into commercial products, [#permalink]
GMATWhizTeam nightblade354

Isn't "evidence" a bit too strong to describe the first BF? It seems more like an assumption or a prediction

Posted from my mobile device
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Posts: 1734
Own Kudos [?]: 5741 [4]
Given Kudos: 3054
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Send PM
Re: Capturing carbon dioxide and turning it into commercial products, [#permalink]
4
Kudos
Expert Reply
firas92, this is a relatively poor question. I ask everyone on the forum to stick to OG and LSAT questions almost exclusively. Doing non-official questions, such as the question above, will only ruin your ability to think critically and correctly on the actual exam.

For the record, evidence is support, meaning it has to be a premise of some kind. Evidence supporting the conclusion is nonexistent in this question (without some major assumptions being made). Further, the question uses sufficient and necessary conditioning for the second boldface. While this is good practice, it won't appear on the GMAT.

On a more personal note, I'd like to know what the author of the question deems to be the conclusion. The first sentence should stand as the conclusion of the argument. It cannot operate as background information because it is so disconnected. But the evidence* points to the conditional statement being the conclusion. This is a wacky question to say the least.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Posts: 474
Own Kudos [?]: 342 [0]
Given Kudos: 28
Send PM
Re: Capturing carbon dioxide and turning it into commercial products, [#permalink]
Capturing carbon dioxide and turning it into commercial products, such as fuels or construction materials, could become a new global industry. On average each utilization pathway could use around 0.5 giga tonnes of carbon dioxide annually that would otherwise escape into the atmosphere. A top-end scenario could see more than 10 giga tonnes of carbon dioxide a year used, at a theoretical cost of under $100 per tonne of carbon dioxide. Clearly, carbon dioxide utilization can be part of the solution to combat climate change, but only if those with the power to make decisions at every level of government and finance commit to changing policies and providing market incentives across multiple sectors.

The main conclusion of this passage is highlighted in green.

The first boldfaced statement is used to support the conclusion.

The second boldfaced statement is used to establish a condition that's necessary for the carbon utilization (indicated in the main conclusion) to be successful.

Hence, (C) is the right answer
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Sep 2020
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 62
Send PM
Re: Capturing carbon dioxide and turning it into commercial products, [#permalink]
First bold part mentions the clear evidence supporting above conclusion and second bold part isnt either a conclusion or a evidence but a requirement condition for other conclusion to come true ...So C

Posted from my mobile device

This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Capturing carbon dioxide and turning it into commercial products, [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne