AndrewN wrote:
lakshya14 wrote:
If doctors think something in the future will happen then why are we using past tense in the correct answer to make it parallel?
Hello,
lakshya14. I understand your confusion, but you are overlooking the modal auxiliary
can be, a construct that is used to project into the future—e.g.,
I hope our wrecked car can be salvaged. The correct sentence uses ellipsis to allow this
can be to carry over into the other parallel entities:
can be directed... [can be] used... and [can be] studied.
You might find
this writeup on auxiliaries and modals to be of interest, although I would not recommend committing everything to memory. (You can get in over your head quickly if you dive into rules upon rules within grammar.)
I hope that helps. Good luck with your studies.
- Andrew
Thanks for the reply, but I have a doubt regarding parallelism. Some question like this also, although in wrong answer in (A) has some adjectives or misfires before the parallel entity such as a verb. This sentence got me wrong because I tried to make it parallel with another entity which is not supposed to be parallel.
I tried to make "grow" be parallel to "use" and "study".
However, one more mistake I may be doing in this may be that the stem "can be directed to (grow), (use) and (study)" breaks before "study" because i it has "may" before study, and when we join it with the main stem it becomes "can be directed to may study", but if we eliminate "may it makes sense. I have seen few questions where the main parallel verb has modifiers before it, and I tend to skip them to check it whether it is parallel. Or may be it could be that I was getting those question wrong modifier were making a sense and I was just lucky to get them right even after skipping the modifiers
So, should we every time check the modifiers before the verb so that it makes sense with the main stem?