Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 08:37

It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 08:37

Toolkit

Practice Tests

Critical Reasoning (CR)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Nov 20
Biggest GMAT Sale of the Year: 25% Off
11:00 AM EST
-
11:59 PM EST
Don’t miss Target Test Prep’s biggest sale of the year! Grab 25% off any Target Test Prep GMAT plan during our Black Friday sale. Just enter the coupon code BLACKFRIDAY25 at checkout to save up to $625.
Nov 20
UCR MBA Impact - Live Q&A with UCR AdCom & Student
07:30 AM PST
-
08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 22
GMAT RC Masterclass
11:00 AM IST
-
01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Nov 22
GRE Practice Test #46 - Free GRE Practice Covering Quant, Text Completion, Sentence Equivalence
12:00 PM PST
-
12:30 PM PST
olve GRE practice problems covering Quantitative reasoning, Verbal Reasoning, Text Completion, Sentence Equivalence, and Reading Comprehension Problems. Take this GRE practice quiz live with peers, analyze your GRE study progress,
Nov 23
GMAT Quiz #49 - GMAT Practice Covering Quant, Verbal, RC, & Data Insights
10:00 AM PST
-
11:00 AM PST
GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 23
Conquer Algebra on the GMAT Focus Edition
11:00 AM IST
-
01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease.
Nov 30
Black Friday Sale: $325 Off TTP OnDemand
10:00 AM EST
-
11:59 PM EST
Get $325 off the TTP OnDemand GMAT masterclass by using the coupon code BLACKFRIDAY25 at checkout. If you prefer learning through engaging video lessons, TTP OnDemand GMAT is exactly what you need.

Back to Forum

Create Topic

Dr. A: The new influenza vaccine is useless at best and possibly dange

sjgmat

Joined: 22 Apr 2008

Last visit: 07 Feb 2010

Posts: 20

Own Kudos:

397

[179]

Posts: 20

Kudos: 397

[179]

25 Jul 2008, 04:12

Kudos

163

Bookmarks

00:00

Start Timer

Pause Timer

Resume Timer

Show Answer

Hide

Show

History

Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

24% (01:50) correct

76% (02:01) wrong

based on 3288 sessions

History

Date

Time

Result

Not Attempted Yet

Dr. A: The new influenza vaccine is useless at best and possibly dangerous. I would never use it on a patient.
Dr. B: But three studies published in the Journal of Medical Associates have rated that vaccine as unusually effective.
Dr. A: The studies must have been faulty because the vaccine is worthless.

In which of the following is the reasoning most similar to that of Dr. A?

(A) Three of my patients have been harmed by that vaccine during the past three weeks, so the vaccine is unsafe.

(B) Jerrold Jersey recommends this milk, and I don’t trust Jerrold Jersey, so I won’t buy this milk.

(C) Wingzz tennis balls perform best because they are far more effective than any other tennis balls.

(D) I’m buying Vim Vitamins. Doctors recommend them more often than they recommend any other vitamins, so Vim Vitamins must be good.

(E) Since University of Muldoon graduates score about 20 percent higher than average on the GMAT, Sheila Lee, a University of Muldoon graduate, will score about 20 percent higher than average when she takes the GMAT.

Show Answer

Official Answer

Most Helpful Reply

zonk

Current Student

Joined: 12 Jul 2008

Last visit: 10 Nov 2013

Posts: 366

Own Kudos:

351

[48]

Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship, Health Care

Schools:Wharton

Posts: 366

Kudos: 351

[48]

25 Jul 2008, 10:24

Kudos

Bookmarks

sjgmat

Dr. A: The new influenza vaccine is useless at best and possibly dangerous. I would never use it on a patient. Dr. B: But three studies published in the Journal of Medical Associates have rated that vaccine as unusually effective. Dr. A: The studies must have been faulty because the vaccine is worthless. In which of the following is the reasoning most similar to that of Dr. A?

(A) Three of my patients have been harmed by that vaccine during the past three weeks, so the vaccine is unsafe.
(B) Jerrold Jersey recommends this milk, and I don’t trust Jerrold Jersey, so I won’t buy this milk.
(C) Wingzz tennis balls perform best because they are far more effective than any other tennis balls.
(D) I’m buying Vim Vitamins. Doctors recommend them more often than they recommend any other vitamins, so Vim Vitamins must be good.
(E) Since University of Muldoon graduates score about 20 percent higher than average on the GMAT, Sheila Lee, a University of Muldoon graduate, will score about 20 percent higher than average when she takes the GMAT.

Any opinoins?

Can someone guide me with general logic/checkpoints to tackle such questions? 90% of time I select wrong solution :cry:

Thanks

Answer is C. The stimulus shows circular reasoning.

A: I think the vaccine is bad.
B: The vaccine is not bad because of these data.
A: The data must be wrong, because the vaccine is bad.

C also shows circular reasoning:
Wingzz tennis balls are the best because they are the best.

goalsnr

Joined: 03 Apr 2007

Last visit: 17 Oct 2012

Posts: 630

Own Kudos:

5,068

[14]

Given Kudos: 10

Products:

Posts: 630

Kudos: 5,068

[14]

25 Jul 2008, 09:51

Kudos

Bookmarks

sjgmat

Dr. A: The new influenza vaccine is useless at best and possibly dangerous. I would never use it on a patient. Dr. B: But three studies published in the Journal of Medical Associates have rated that vaccine as unusually effective. Dr. A: The studies must have been faulty because the vaccine is worthless. In which of the following is the reasoning most similar to that of Dr. A?

(A) Three of my patients have been harmed by that vaccine during the past three weeks, so the vaccine is unsafe.
(B) Jerrold Jersey recommends this milk, and I don’t trust Jerrold Jersey, so I won’t buy this milk.
(C) Wingzz tennis balls perform best because they are far more effective than any other tennis balls.
(D) I’m buying Vim Vitamins. Doctors recommend them more often than they recommend any other vitamins, so Vim Vitamins must be good.
(E) Since University of Muldoon graduates score about 20 percent higher than average on the GMAT, Sheila Lee, a University of Muldoon graduate, will score about 20 percent higher than average when she takes the GMAT.

Any opinoins?

Can someone guide me with general logic/checkpoints to tackle such questions? 90% of time I select wrong solution :cry:

Thanks

C

Dr A says the vaccine is useless without giving reasons why it is useless.

In C - its stated tennis balls are best without giving reasons

General Discussion

snaps

Joined: 11 Mar 2008

Last visit: 27 Jan 2012

Posts: 54

Own Kudos:

[12]

Location: Canada

Posts: 54

Kudos: 78

[12]

02 Sep 2008, 12:25

Kudos

Bookmarks

sjgmat

Dr. A: The new influenza vaccine is useless at best and possibly dangerous. I would never use it on a patient. Dr. B: But three studies published in the Journal of Medical Associates have rated that vaccine as unusually effective. Dr. A: The studies must have been faulty because the vaccine is worthless. In which of the following is the reasoning most similar to that of Dr. A?

(A) Three of my patients have been harmed by that vaccine during the past three weeks, so the vaccine is unsafe.
(B) Jerrold Jersey recommends this milk, and I don’t trust Jerrold Jersey, so I won’t buy this milk.
(C) Wingzz tennis balls perform best because they are far more effective than any other tennis balls.
(D) I’m buying Vim Vitamins. Doctors recommend them more often than they recommend any other vitamins, so Vim Vitamins must be good.
(E) Since University of Muldoon graduates score about 20 percent higher than average on the GMAT, Sheila Lee, a University of Muldoon graduate, will score about 20 percent higher than average when she takes the GMAT.

Info from the text: “The vaccine is useless” because “the vaccine is worthless” i.e. no reason is given

A) “The vaccine is unsafe” because “three patients have been harmed” some sort of reasoning is present

B) JJ recommends this milk BUT SINCE i don’t trust this ninja i won’t buy this milk – a reason is there: this ninja is not trustworthy source for info

C) WingzZ balls perform better because they are “far more effective than others” i.e. better. So WingzZ get to perform Better because they are Better.

D) I buy VVs because doctor recommends them more often because blah blah -- I bought a Yugo car because my best friend recommended it.

E) Reason is given

Thus C is the answer.

KnewtonAlex

Knewton GMAT Representative

Joined: 27 Oct 2009

Last visit: 18 Feb 2010

Posts: 11

Own Kudos:

Affiliations: Knewton, Inc.

Posts: 11

Kudos: 72

29 Oct 2009, 06:27

Kudos

Bookmarks

I agree with Hades that this type of question is much more likely to appear on the LSAT than on the GMAT. In fact, on the LSAT, the question stem would ask "which of the following displays FLAWED reasoning most similar to that of Dr. A?"

That said, C is the best answer.

Dr. A is taking as a given (evidence) that the vaccine is useless, and then basing his or her conclusion about the studies on that evidence. This is flawed because the studies should be judged to be true or false regardless of any preconceived notion about the vaccine.
Likewise, answer choice C is claiming as evidence that Wingzz tennis balls are the most effective, and then basing its conclusion, "they perform best," on that evidence; the same backwards reasoning shown in the prompt. The performance of tennis balls is not BASED on their effectiveness, it is the thing that tells us how effective they are, just like the studies should tell us whether the vaccine works or not.

The only other viable choice, B, is incorrect because it displays a different distinct flaw, common on the LSAT: attacking a speaker rather than a speaker's ideas. There is no analogue to "Jerrold Jersey" (a person whose opinion should not be trusted) in the prompt. In the prompt, the attack on the studies is impersonal, based on a generalization. In B, the attack on Jerrold Jersey IS the generalization.

Alex
Knewton Verbal Developer

elevinty

Joined: 24 Jan 2010

Last visit: 23 Oct 2013

Posts: 102

Own Kudos:

743

[2]

Given Kudos: 12

Status:Mesmerized

Location: UAE, Dubai

Concentration: Finance

Posts: 102

Kudos: 743

[2]

14 Oct 2010, 00:50

Kudos

Bookmarks

this is circular reasoning, i.e., someone is stating something is effective because he thinks it's effective. That someone didn't mention why it's good or effective, and his only reasoning for it is because he thinks it's good. In this questions we need to look for reasoning similar to that. In C there is no mentioning why he thinks the balls are good; he just thinks they are effective.
so the answer is C

nandeta

Joined: 16 Jan 2020

Last visit: 02 Apr 2020

Posts: 52

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 11

Posts: 52

Kudos: 92

29 Jan 2020, 22:36

Kudos

Bookmarks

The crux of this argument is that the logical reasoning of this argument is at fault. So we need to find an answer option who logical reasoning is at fault.
Dr. A: The studies must have been faulty because the vaccine is worthless.
The vaccines can be faulty and that is why the studies is worthless.. nor the other way around.

(A) Three of my patients have been harmed by that vaccine during the past three weeks, so the vaccine is unsafe.
Logical

(B) Jerrold Jersey recommends this milk, and I don’t trust Jerrold Jersey, so I won’t buy this milk.
Logical

(C) Wingzz tennis balls perform best because they are far more effective than any other tennis balls.
Logical

(D) I’m buying Vim Vitamins. Doctors recommend them more often than they recommend any other vitamins, so Vim Vitamins must be good.
Logical

(E) Since University of Muldoon graduates score about 20 percent higher than average on the GMAT, Sheila Lee, a University of Muldoon graduate, will score about 20 percent higher than average when she takes the GMAT.
Illogical. Gmat scores depends on your personal capability and not in your college name.

aarushi4101

Joined: 14 Jul 2020

Last visit: 21 Aug 2020

Posts: 4

Given Kudos: 13

Posts: 4

Kudos: 0

12 Aug 2020, 09:06

Kudos

Bookmarks

ERROR..
I couldn't understand these kinda questions ...totally confused in all the given options. Even after reading this question thrice ,my mind goes with option B and not C...IS IT WISE TO LEAVE SUCH QUESTIONS IN EXAM???

richirish

Joined: 25 May 2020

Last visit: 09 Feb 2021

Posts: 127

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 40

Schools: Kenan-Flagler'23 (D)

Posts: 127

Kudos: 60

[1]

13 Aug 2020, 05:26

Kudos

Bookmarks

aarushi4101

If you don't want to score above V40 then yes, otherwise a big NO.

CRACKGMATNUT

Joined: 23 Jul 2020

Last visit: 26 May 2024

Posts: 150

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 30

Location: India

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing

Schools: Ivey '24 (A)

GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35 Verified score

Schools: Ivey '24 (A)

GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35 Verified score

Posts: 150

Kudos: 31

25 Aug 2020, 12:45

Kudos

Bookmarks

Hi. Can anyone help explaining why ain't the reasoning Strawman instead ?

Dr. A try to falsify the argument with no clear understanding, which can be easily broken by DR. B

Can anyone explain how is Stimulus circular reasoning?

Posted from my mobile device

Fdambro294

Joined: 10 Jul 2019

Last visit: 20 Aug 2025

Posts: 1,350

Own Kudos:

742

Given Kudos: 1,656

Posts: 1,350

Kudos: 742

28 Aug 2021, 20:03

Kudos

Bookmarks

Dr A is performing what is known as an Informal Logical Fallacy nicknamed “Begging the Question.”

Basically this occurs when the author’s Premises aren’t used as support for the Conclusion: the argument’s premises already assume that the conclusion is true.

The author has already assumed the truth of his conclusion, rather than providing any support for the conclusion.

“Running helps you lose weight because running leads to weight loss.”

In the above example, there is no support for the claim that running helps you lose weight. The conclusion is already assumed in the premises.

The above is a more extreme example but it basically occurs when the facts that are used as support already assume that the conclusion is true.

Dr A says: “the studies must have been faulty because the vaccine is worthless.

Dr A is out to prove that the studies proving that the vaccine might have some value must be wrong because the vaccines does not have any value.

That is essentially the pattern we are looking for.

(B) There is support offered in the argument pattern in B. Because the author doesn’t trust Jerrold Jersey’s milk recommendations, the author won’t buy the milk.

This is a separate logical fallacy in which you dismiss someone’s argument because of something personal about the author: not on the basis of the facts presented.

It does not fallow the same pattern.

(C) “Wingzz tennis balls perform the best because they are far more effective than any other.”

Just as Dr. A did in his argument, this author is already assuming the Conclusion within the premises.

Effectively, because the balls are the most effective ———-> they are better than any other ball.

There is a slim opening to say “what does effective really mean.” Maybe the ball’s effectiveness is some kind of industry jargon that somehow indicates the balls are better and it can be relied on as actual evidence.

However, common sense would tell us that the author is basically repeating the conclusion in his premises, just as Dr A did in the passage.

I believe this answer best illustrates the “Begging the Question” fallacy.

Posted from my mobile device

drabhinabasaha

Joined: 30 Oct 2024

Last visit: 24 Jun 2025

Posts: 1

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 5

Location: India

Posts: 1

Kudos: 1

[1]

13 Nov 2024, 10:39

Kudos

Bookmarks

It's like saying JOCKEY or nothing!

sjgmat

raviteja00seven

Joined: 14 Nov 2024

Last visit: 02 Oct 2025

Posts: 5

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 57

Posts: 5

Kudos: 1

21 Dec 2024, 09:51

Kudos

Bookmarks

ninjas !!??:dazed you sure make learning fun

snaps

sjgmat

Dr. A: The new influenza vaccine is useless at best and possibly dangerous. I would never use it on a patient. Dr. B: But three studies published in the Journal of Medical Associates have rated that vaccine as unusually effective. Dr. A: The studies must have been faulty because the vaccine is worthless. In which of the following is the reasoning most similar to that of Dr. A?

(A) Three of my patients have been harmed by that vaccine during the past three weeks, so the vaccine is unsafe.
(B) Jerrold Jersey recommends this milk, and I don’t trust Jerrold Jersey, so I won’t buy this milk.
(C) Wingzz tennis balls perform best because they are far more effective than any other tennis balls.
(D) I’m buying Vim Vitamins. Doctors recommend them more often than they recommend any other vitamins, so Vim Vitamins must be good.
(E) Since University of Muldoon graduates score about 20 percent higher than average on the GMAT, Sheila Lee, a University of Muldoon graduate, will score about 20 percent higher than average when she takes the GMAT.