Last visit was: 17 Jul 2025, 08:45 It is currently 17 Jul 2025, 08:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
scarish
Joined: 01 Aug 2009
Last visit: 03 Apr 2012
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
158
 [136]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: Australia
Concentration: General Management, Business Strategy, Enterprenuership
Posts: 12
Kudos: 158
 [136]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
122
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,601
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,220
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,601
Kudos: 742,194
 [55]
23
Kudos
Add Kudos
32
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
blink005
Joined: 20 Aug 2011
Last visit: 23 Jun 2016
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
213
 [16]
Posts: 61
Kudos: 213
 [16]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
esledge
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Last visit: 05 Feb 2011
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
1,537
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: St. Louis, MO
Schools:Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Posts: 144
Kudos: 1,537
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For questions with a fixed sum (here 5*avg = 620), if you need to maximize one term, then you minimize all the others. Likewise, if asked to minimize one term, you maximize all the others.

I find it useful to create placeholders for the terms on paper, filling in with numbers/variables:

(In order, smallest to largest)
x / x / 140 / 140 / 140 = sum of 620
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,601
Own Kudos:
742,194
 [3]
Given Kudos: 98,220
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,601
Kudos: 742,194
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Five pieces of wood have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 124 centimeters and a median length of 140 centimeters. What is the maximum possible length, in centimeters, of the shortest piece of wood?

A. 90
B. 100
C. 110
D. 130
E. 140

Given: 5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 centimeters --> total length = 124*5=620. Also median = 140.

If a set has odd number of terms the median of a set is the middle number when arranged in ascending or descending order;
If a set has even number of terms the median of a set is the average of the two middle terms when arranged in ascending or descending order.


As we have odd # of pieces then 3rd largest piece \(x_3=median=140\).

So if we consider the pieces in ascending order of their lengths we would have \(x_1+x_2+140+x_4+x_5=620\).

Question: what is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? Or \(max(x_1)=?\)

General rule for such kind of problems:
to maximize one quantity, minimize the others;
to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.

So to maximize \(x_1\) we should minimize \(x_2\), \(x_4\) and \(x_5\). Min length of the second largest piece of wood, \(x_2\) could be equal to \(x_1\) and the min lengths of \(x_4\) and \(x_5\) could be equal to 140 --> \(x_1+x_1+140+140+140=620\) --> \(x_1=100\).

Answer: B.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,111
Own Kudos:
74,367
 [2]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,111
Kudos: 74,367
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AnkitK
5 pieces of wood have an average length of 124 cm and a median of 140 cm .what is the maximum possible length in cm of the shortest piece of wood?
A.90
B.100
C.110
D.130
E.140

It is a nice question, a GMAT type question i.e. fun to work out, can be reasoned out fairly quickly but needs you to think a little. Follow my train of thought here (which finally takes just a few seconds when you start doing it on your own)

First thing that comes to mind - Median is the 3rd term out of 5 so the lengths arranged must look like:

___ _____ 140 _______ __________

The mean is given and I need to maximize the smallest number. Basically, it should be as close to the mean as possible. Which means the greatest number should be as close to the mean as possible too.
If this doesn't make sense, think of a set with mean 20:
19, 20, 21 (smallest number very close to mean, greatest very close to mean too)
10, 20, 30 (smallest number far away, greatest far away too)

Using the same logic, lets make the greatest number as small as possible. The two greatest numbers should both be at least 140 (since 140 is the median)

___ _____ 140 140 140

Since the mean is 124, the 3 greatest numbers are already 16 each more than 124 i.e. total 16*3 = 48 more than the mean. So the two smallest numbers should be a total of 48 less than mean, 124. To make the smallest number as great as possible, both the small numbers should be 24 each less than the mean i.e. they should be 100.
User avatar
gmat1220
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 17 Feb 2020
Posts: 466
Own Kudos:
963
 [1]
Given Kudos: 123
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Products:
Posts: 466
Kudos: 963
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Karishma
I don't know if the key word "shortest" means the second. It means the least. So the answer should be 99 practically because of the need to differentiate the first from the second- and be compatible with keyword. Your thoughts on this?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,111
Own Kudos:
74,367
 [2]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,111
Kudos: 74,367
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmat1220
Karishma
I don't know if the key word "shortest" means the second. It means the least. So the answer should be 99 practically because of the need to differentiate the first from the second- and be compatible with keyword. Your thoughts on this?

Posted from my mobile device

Hey gmat1220,

Smallest just means the smallest element. It doesn't necessarily mean that there should be a unique 'smallest number'.

Say {1, 2, 5, 9, 1, 3, 9}
Which is the smallest number here? 1 right? It doesn't matter even if it appears twice. If I arrange them in ascending order {1, 1, 2, 3 ....} .. the first and the second both are smallest (or shortest length).
So two pieces of wood could have the shortest length. It would be maximized only if their lengths are equal and both have a length of 100.
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,634
 [4]
Given Kudos: 97
 Q51  V47
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,634
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
socalboy429
Five pieces of wood have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 124 centimeters and a median length of 140 centimeters. What is the maximum possible
length, in centimeters, of the shortest piece of wood:

A. 90
B. 100
C. 110
D. 130
E. 140

Say we list the lengths of our pieces of wood in increasing order:

S, a, 140, b, L

We know that the sum of these lengths is 5*124 = 620. Now, we want to make S, the smallest length, as big as possible. To do that, we want the other unknown lengths to 'use up' as little of the sum of 620 as possible. That is, the smaller we make a, b and L, the larger we can make S. Since b and L must be at least as large as the median, the smallest possible values for b and L are 140. That gives us this set:

S, a, 140, 140, 140

The three largest values now add to 420, so the two smallest values must add to 620-420 = 200. Since making them equal will make a as small as possible (a cannot be less than S), the largest possible value of S is 200/2 = 100.
User avatar
Skag55
Joined: 26 Feb 2013
Last visit: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 122
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 122
Kudos: 189
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
enigma123
Apologies blink005, if I am getting this wrong. But how did you get this?

The minimum possible values of L4 and L5 could be 140, hence the L1+L2 = 620 - 420 = 200.

Below is step by step analysis of this question. Hope it helps.

5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches and a median of 140 inches. What is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood?
A. 90
B. 100
C. 110
D. 130
E. 140

Given: 5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches --> total length = 124*5=620. Also median = 140.

If a set has odd number of terms the median of a set is the middle number when arranged in ascending or descending order;
If a set has even number of terms the median of a set is the average of the two middle terms when arranged in ascending or descending order.


As we have odd # of pieces then 3rd largest piece \(x_3=median=140\).

So if we consider the pieces in ascending order of their lengths we would have \(x_1+x_2+140+x_4+x_5=620\).

Question: what is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? Or \(max(x_1)=?\)

General rule for such kind of problems:
to maximize one quantity, minimize the others;
to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.

So to maximize \(x_1\) we should minimize \(x_2\), \(x_4\) and \(x_5\). Min length of the second largest piece of wood, \(x_2\) could be equal to \(x_1\) and the min lengths of \(x_4\) and \(x_5\) could be equal to 140 --> \(x_1+x_1+140+140+140=620\) --> \(x_1=100\).

Answer: B.

Why couldn't x4 and x5 be bigger than 140 and thus making x1 and x2 even smaller?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,601
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,220
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,601
Kudos: 742,194
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skag55
Bunuel
enigma123
Apologies blink005, if I am getting this wrong. But how did you get this?

The minimum possible values of L4 and L5 could be 140, hence the L1+L2 = 620 - 420 = 200.

Below is step by step analysis of this question. Hope it helps.

5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches and a median of 140 inches. What is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood?
A. 90
B. 100
C. 110
D. 130
E. 140

Given: 5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches --> total length = 124*5=620. Also median = 140.

If a set has odd number of terms the median of a set is the middle number when arranged in ascending or descending order;
If a set has even number of terms the median of a set is the average of the two middle terms when arranged in ascending or descending order.


As we have odd # of pieces then 3rd largest piece \(x_3=median=140\).

So if we consider the pieces in ascending order of their lengths we would have \(x_1+x_2+140+x_4+x_5=620\).

Question: what is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? Or \(max(x_1)=?\)

General rule for such kind of problems:
to maximize one quantity, minimize the others;
to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.

So to maximize \(x_1\) we should minimize \(x_2\), \(x_4\) and \(x_5\). Min length of the second largest piece of wood, \(x_2\) could be equal to \(x_1\) and the min lengths of \(x_4\) and \(x_5\) could be equal to 140 --> \(x_1+x_1+140+140+140=620\) --> \(x_1=100\).

Answer: B.

Why couldn't x4 and x5 be bigger than 140 and thus making x1 and x2 even smaller?

We want to maximize \(x_1\), not to minimize.

Next, \(x_4\) and \(x_5\) cannot be less than the median, which is 140.
User avatar
stonecold
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Last visit: 09 Apr 2024
Posts: 2,248
Own Kudos:
3,470
 [1]
Given Kudos: 893
GRE 1: Q169 V154
GRE 1: Q169 V154
Posts: 2,248
Kudos: 3,470
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here is my solution to this Great Official Question =>

Let W1,W2,W3,W4,W5 be the 5 wooden pieces in increasing order of length.
Given Mean = 124

\(Mean = Sum/#\)

Hence Sum(5) = 124*5 = 620
Now Median = 140
As #=5
Hence median => 3rd term => W3
Hence W3=140

Now to maximise the smallest piece that is W1 we must minimise all the other pieces keeping in mind the following things =>
All values To the left of median must be either less than or equal to it.
All values to the right of median must be greater than or equal to it.
All values in set must be greater than or equal W1
All values in set must be less than or equal to W5


Hence W1+W1+140+140+140 = 620
W1=100
Hence Maximum length of smallest piece of food is 100 inches

Hence B
avatar
shringi87
Joined: 02 Sep 2017
Last visit: 04 Oct 2018
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 14
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Your question is not clear. What are you trying to achieve? The question asks: What is the maximum possible length, in centimeters, of the shortest piece of wood? The answer is 100 centimeters. You got 90 centimeters...[/quote]:

My bad, miss read the question. Apologies
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,703
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,703
Kudos: 5,228
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
scarish
Five pieces of wood have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 124 centimeters and a median length of 140 centimeters. What is the maximum possible length, in centimeters, of the shortest piece of wood?

A. 90
B. 100
C. 110
D. 130
E. 140

Given: Five pieces of wood have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 124 centimeters and a median length of 140 centimeters.

Asked: What is the maximum possible length, in centimeters, of the shortest piece of wood?

Let the 5 pieces of wood have lengths = {s, s, 140, 140, 140}

2s + 140*3 = 124*5
2s = 620 - 420 = 200
s = 100

The maximum possible length, in centimeters, of the shortest piece of wood = 100 cms

IMO B
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 8,350
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
Posts: 8,350
Kudos: 4,830
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
scarish
Five pieces of wood have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 124 centimeters and a median length of 140 centimeters. What is the maximum possible length, in centimeters, of the shortest piece of wood?

A. 90
B. 100
C. 110
D. 130
E. 140

need to maximize length of shortest wood
x+x+140+140+140 = 620
2x = 200
x=100
option b
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 362
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 362
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Five pieces of wood have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 124 centimeters and a median length of 140 centimeters. What is the maximum possible length, in centimeters, of the shortest piece of wood?

A. 90
B. 100
C. 110
D. 130
E. 140

Given: 5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 centimeters --> total length = 124*5=620. Also median = 140.

If a set has odd number of terms the median of a set is the middle number when arranged in ascending or descending order;
If a set has even number of terms the median of a set is the average of the two middle terms when arranged in ascending or descending order.


As we have odd # of pieces then 3rd largest piece \(x_3=median=140\).

So if we consider the pieces in ascending order of their lengths we would have \(x_1+x_2+140+x_4+x_5=620\).

Question: what is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? Or \(max(x_1)=?\)

General rule for such kind of problems:
to maximize one quantity, minimize the others;
to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.

So to maximize \(x_1\) we should minimize \(x_2\), \(x_4\) and \(x_5\). Min length of the second largest piece of wood, \(x_2\) could be equal to \(x_1\) and the min lengths of \(x_4\) and \(x_5\) could be equal to 140 --> \(x_1+x_1+140+140+140=620\) --> \(x_1=100\).

Answer: B.

Why the last two values should not be greater than 140? We have to maximize it so can't we go over 140. which even lessen the value of a1?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,601
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,220
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,601
Kudos: 742,194
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lakshya14
Bunuel
Five pieces of wood have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 124 centimeters and a median length of 140 centimeters. What is the maximum possible length, in centimeters, of the shortest piece of wood?

A. 90
B. 100
C. 110
D. 130
E. 140

Given: 5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 centimeters --> total length = 124*5=620. Also median = 140.

If a set has odd number of terms the median of a set is the middle number when arranged in ascending or descending order;
If a set has even number of terms the median of a set is the average of the two middle terms when arranged in ascending or descending order.


As we have odd # of pieces then 3rd largest piece \(x_3=median=140\).

So if we consider the pieces in ascending order of their lengths we would have \(x_1+x_2+140+x_4+x_5=620\).

Question: what is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? Or \(max(x_1)=?\)

General rule for such kind of problems:
to maximize one quantity, minimize the others;
to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.

So to maximize \(x_1\) we should minimize \(x_2\), \(x_4\) and \(x_5\). Min length of the second largest piece of wood, \(x_2\) could be equal to \(x_1\) and the min lengths of \(x_4\) and \(x_5\) could be equal to 140 --> \(x_1+x_1+140+140+140=620\) --> \(x_1=100\).

Answer: B.

Why the last two values should not be greater than 140? We have to maximize it so can't we go over 140. which even lessen the value of a1?


I think I addressed this here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/five-pieces- ... l#p1260389
avatar
sanjeevsinha082
Joined: 20 Apr 2020
Last visit: 22 Sep 2021
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
11
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
Posts: 44
Kudos: 11
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To get the maximum length of the shortest piece, we must let other values as little as possible.
That is, the values after the median should equal the median, and the value before the median
should be equal to each other.
Let the shortest one be x:
x+x+140*3=124*5
x=100
User avatar
SolankiDas
Joined: 21 Jan 2022
Last visit: 01 Jun 2023
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 44
Posts: 27
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
scarish
Five pieces of wood have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 124 centimeters and a median length of 140 centimeters. What is the maximum possible length, in centimeters, of the shortest piece of wood?

A. 90
B. 100
C. 110
D. 130
E. 140

Why can't L2 also be 140 as we need to maximize l3,l4,l5 and l2
l2 can be equal to or less than 140 so to maximize l2 why cant it be 140.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 37,436
Own Kudos:
Posts: 37,436
Kudos: 1,013
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
102601 posts
PS Forum Moderator
697 posts