Mo2men wrote:
But what do you mean by "if you did, you'd be answering a different question."? When I should count the prime numbers? As far as I know, there isa difference between number of prime factors & number of unique prime factors?
If you asked a mathematician "how many prime factors does (2^6)(5^8) have?", they would say "two", because there are two prime numbers that divide (2^6)(5^8), namely 2 and 5. I'm not exactly sure how someone would justify counting the 2 six times, and the 5 eight times. Now, it is true in actual Number Theory that you sometimes care about counting repeated prime divisors, when you are finding something called the "length" of a number (there is one old GMAT question that tests this, but it tells you the definition of "length" in the question itself). For that reason, the GMAT will normally use the phrase "distinct prime divisors" to avoid any potential confusion, but the word "distinct" isn't really necessary.
You can see why the interpretation I'm making is the logically correct one by asking a different question: "how many divisors does 256 have?" You wouldn't count "4" more than once, even though you can divide 256 by 4 a few times. So if I ask "how many prime divisors does 256 have?" you similarly would not count '2' more than once, even though you can divide 256 by 2 several times.