Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:14 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
manulath
Joined: 12 May 2012
Last visit: 05 May 2020
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
259
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 650 Q51 V25
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
WE:General Management (Transportation)
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
Posts: 55
Kudos: 259
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
pavanpuneet
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Last visit: 13 Feb 2014
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
139
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 75
Kudos: 139
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,388
Own Kudos:
778,221
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,388
Kudos: 778,221
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dabral
User avatar
Tutor
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Last visit: 29 Nov 2024
Posts: 557
Own Kudos:
664
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Affiliations: GMATQuantum
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 557
Kudos: 664
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here is a video explanation that takes a slightly different approach using graphs of basic functions:

https://www.gmatquantum.com/shared-posts ... -xx-x.html

Cheers,
Dabral
User avatar
oyabu
Joined: 08 Mar 2013
Last visit: 27 Apr 2015
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
24
 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
WE:Analyst (Law)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 11
Kudos: 24
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Hussain15
If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x|< x

(2) |x| > x

Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation.

\(x\neq{0}\), is \(|x|<1\)? Which means is \(-1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\))

(1) \(\frac{x}{|x|}< x\)
Two cases:
A. \(x<0\) --> \(\frac{x}{-x}<x\) --> \(-1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(-1<x<0\)
.

if x<0, doesn't x/|x|<x become -x/x<-x which simplifies to -1<-x or x<1 ?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,388
Own Kudos:
778,221
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,388
Kudos: 778,221
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
oyabu
Bunuel
Hussain15
If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x|< x

(2) |x| > x

Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation.

\(x\neq{0}\), is \(|x|<1\)? Which means is \(-1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\))

(1) \(\frac{x}{|x|}< x\)
Two cases:
A. \(x<0\) --> \(\frac{x}{-x}<x\) --> \(-1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(-1<x<0\)
.

if x<0, doesn't x/|x|<x become -x/x<-x which simplifies to -1<-x or x<1 ?

When \(x<0\), then \(|x|=-x\), thus \(\frac{x}{|x|}<x\) becomes \(\frac{x}{-x}<x\) --> \(-1<x\) but since \(x<0\), then \(-1<x<0\).

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,784
Own Kudos:
12,806
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,784
Kudos: 12,806
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

There are a handful of Number Property rules in this DS question that you can find by either TESTing VALUES or taking lots of notes.

We're told that X cannot = 0. We're asked if |X| < 1. This is a YES/NO question.

Fact 1: X/|X| < X

This inequality requires a thorough examination of the possibilities.

X CANNOT = 1 since 1/|1| is NOT < 1

X can be ANY number > 1 though

If X = 2....
2/|2| < 2
And the answer to the question is NO.

X CANNOT be a positive fraction...

If X = 1/2
(1/2)/|1/2| = 1 which is NOT < 1/2

X could be ANY negative fraction though

If X = -1/2
(-1/2)/|-1/2| = -1 which IS < -1/2
And the answer to the question is YES.

X CANNOT be -1 since -1/|-1| is NOT < -1

X CANNOT be < -1...

X = -2
(-2)/|-2| = -1 which is NOT < -2

According to all of this data, the possibilities are X > 1 or -1 < X < 0
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: |X|> X

Here, we know that X can be ANY negative, but CANNOT be positive.

If X = -1/2 then the answer to the question is YES (we did the work already in Fact 1)
If X = -2 then the answer to the question is NO
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combining Facts, we have...
X > 1 or -1 < X < 0
AND
X MUST be negative

The ONLY possibilities that fit BOTH Facts ARE negative fractions. Thus the answer to the question will be ALWAYS YES.
Combined, SUFFICIENT

Final Answer:
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
ranaazad
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,323
Location: Bangladesh
GMAT 1: 490 Q41 V18
GMAT 2: 610 Q45 V28
GPA: 2.75
GMAT 2: 610 Q45 V28
Posts: 66
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Hussain15
If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x|< x

(2) |x| > x

Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation.

\(x\neq{0}\), is \(|x|<1\)? Which means is \(-1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\))

(1) \(\frac{x}{|x|}< x\)
Two cases:
A. \(x<0\) --> \(\frac{x}{-x}<x\) --> \(-1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(-1<x<0\)

B. \(x>0\) --> \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) --> \(1<x\).

Two ranges \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). Which says that \(x\) either in the first range or in the second. Not sufficient to answer whether \(-1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(-0.5\) or \(3\))

Second approach: look at the fraction \(\frac{x}{|x|}\) it can take only two values:
1 for \(x>0\) --> so we would have: \(1<x\);
Or -1 for \(x<0\) --> so we would have: \(-1<x\) and as we considering the range for which \(x<0\) then completer range would be: \(-1<x<0\).

The same two ranges: \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\).

(2) \(|x| > x\). Well this basically tells that \(x\) is negative, as if x were positive or zero then \(|x|\) would be equal to \(x\). Only one range: \(x<0\), but still insufficient to say whether \(-1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(-0.5\) or \(-10\))

Or two cases again:
\(x<0\)--> \(-x>x\)--> \(x<0\).
\(x>0\) --> \(x>x\): never correct.


(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is the range \(-1<x<0\) (\(x<0\) (from 2) and \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\) (from 1), hence \(-1<x<0\)). Every \(x\) from this range is definitely in the range \(-1<x<1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.


Thanks for your nice explanations. I am not clear on one issue though. As we can multiply an inequality by a variable only if we know its sign, how can we multiply both side of an inequality by an absolute value? Would you please explain..
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,388
Own Kudos:
778,221
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,388
Kudos: 778,221
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ranaazad
Bunuel
Hussain15
If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x|< x

(2) |x| > x

Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation.

\(x\neq{0}\), is \(|x|<1\)? Which means is \(-1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\))

(1) \(\frac{x}{|x|}< x\)
Two cases:
A. \(x<0\) --> \(\frac{x}{-x}<x\) --> \(-1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(-1<x<0\)

B. \(x>0\) --> \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) --> \(1<x\).

Two ranges \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). Which says that \(x\) either in the first range or in the second. Not sufficient to answer whether \(-1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(-0.5\) or \(3\))

Second approach: look at the fraction \(\frac{x}{|x|}\) it can take only two values:
1 for \(x>0\) --> so we would have: \(1<x\);
Or -1 for \(x<0\) --> so we would have: \(-1<x\) and as we considering the range for which \(x<0\) then completer range would be: \(-1<x<0\).

The same two ranges: \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\).

(2) \(|x| > x\). Well this basically tells that \(x\) is negative, as if x were positive or zero then \(|x|\) would be equal to \(x\). Only one range: \(x<0\), but still insufficient to say whether \(-1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(-0.5\) or \(-10\))

Or two cases again:
\(x<0\)--> \(-x>x\)--> \(x<0\).
\(x>0\) --> \(x>x\): never correct.


(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is the range \(-1<x<0\) (\(x<0\) (from 2) and \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\) (from 1), hence \(-1<x<0\)). Every \(x\) from this range is definitely in the range \(-1<x<1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.


Thanks for your nice explanations. I am not clear on one issue though. As we can multiply an inequality by a variable only if we know its sign, how can we multiply both side of an inequality by an absolute value? Would you please explain..

An absolute value of a number cannot be negative (it's 0 or positive), and since we are given that x is not 0, then |x| is positive only.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,784
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,784
Kudos: 12,806
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

This DS question is built around some interesting Number Properties and patterns. If you can spot those patterns, then solving this problem should take considerably less time. This also looks like a question that can be beaten by TESTing VALUES.

We're told that X CANNOT = 0. We're asked if |X| < 1. This is a YES/NO question.

Fact 1: X/|X| < X

Before TESTing VALUES, I want to note a pattern in this inequality:

X/|X| will either equal 1 (if X is positive) OR -1 (if X is negative). This will save us some time when it comes to TESTing VALUES, since there are many values of X that will NOT fit this information.

If X = 2, then the answer to the question is NO.

X cannot be 1, any positive fraction, 0, or any negative integer…..

So what's left to TEST….?

If X = -1/2, then the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: |X| > X

This tells us that X CANNOT be positive or 0.

If X = -1, then the answer to the question is NO.
If X = -1/2, then the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we have deal with the "overlapping restrictions" that we noted in the two Facts:
X cannot be….anything positive, 0, or any negative integer.
X can ONLY BE negative fractions between 0 and -1.
ALL of those answers (e.g. -1/2, -.4, etc.) lead to a YES answer.
Combined SUFFICIENT.

Final Answer:
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
iPen
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Last visit: 20 Dec 2020
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 83
Kudos: 109
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Hussain15
If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x|< x

(2) |x| > x

Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation.

\(x\neq{0}\), is \(|x|<1\)? Which means is \(-1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\))

(1) \(\frac{x}{|x|}< x\)
Two cases:
A. \(x<0\) --> \(\frac{x}{-x}<x\) --> \(-1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(-1<x<0\)

B. \(x>0\) --> \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) --> \(1<x\).

Two ranges \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). Which says that \(x\) either in the first range or in the second. Not sufficient to answer whether \(-1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(-0.5\) or \(3\))

Second approach: look at the fraction \(\frac{x}{|x|}\) it can take only two values:
1 for \(x>0\) --> so we would have: \(1<x\);
Or -1 for \(x<0\) --> so we would have: \(-1<x\) and as we considering the range for which \(x<0\) then completer range would be: \(-1<x<0\).

The same two ranges: \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\).

(2) \(|x| > x\). Well this basically tells that \(x\) is negative, as if x were positive or zero then \(|x|\) would be equal to \(x\). Only one range: \(x<0\), but still insufficient to say whether \(-1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(-0.5\) or \(-10\))

Or two cases again:
\(x<0\)--> \(-x>x\)--> \(x<0\).
\(x>0\) --> \(x>x\): never correct.


(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is the range \(-1<x<0\) (\(x<0\) (from 2) and \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\) (from 1), hence \(-1<x<0\)). Every \(x\) from this range is definitely in the range \(-1<x<1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.


I did mine a little differently.

If x ≠ 0, is |x| < 1?


Means: Is -1 < x < 1?

(1) \(\frac{x}{|x|}< x\)

x < |x|*x
If x is positive, then: \(\frac{x}{x} < |x|\) which is the same as \(1 < |x|\)
This means that \(-1 > x > 1\)

If x is negative, then: \(\frac{x}{x} > |x|\) which is the same as \(1 > |x|\)
This means that \(-1 < x < 1\) (we switch the direction of < to > because we divided by -1 to put |x| by itself).

These two answers are inconsistent: x is both less than 1 and greater than 1. So, insufficient.

(2) \(|x| > x\)
This means that x is negative since the negative value of something is always less than the absolute value of something; whereas, a positive or 0 value of something is equal to its absolute value.

If x is equal to a negative value less than -1, then it's within the range -1 < x < 1. But, if x is equal to a large negative value, |x| can be out of range, for example, x = -1,000. Therefore, (2) is insufficient.

(1) + (2)
|x| > x and |x| > 1
x is negative, and we know that x < -1. So, pick an arbitrary value less than -1, say, -5.
Plug it into equation (1): \(\frac{-5}{|-5|} < -5\). Is \(-1< -5\)? False. x does not refer to values < -1.

|x| > x and |x| < 1
x is negative, and we know that x > -1. Therefore, \(-1 < x < 0\).
Pick an arbitrary value between -1 and 0, non-inclusive, say, -0.5.
Plug it into equation (1): \(\frac{-0.5}{|-0.5|} < -0.5\). Is \(-1 < -0.5\)? Yes, this works. Sufficient.

Answer C.
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,070
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,070
Kudos: 19,390
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x| < x
(2) |x| > x

If the range of the condition falls into that of the condition in terms of inequalities, the condition is sufficient.

There is 1 variable in the original condition, and there are 2 equations provided by the 2 conditions, so there is high chance (D) will be our answer.
For condition 1, if x>0, x/|x|<x --> x/x<x --> 1<x, then 1<x
if x<0, x/|x|<x --> x/-x<x --> -1<x, then -1<x<0. Therefore this condition is insufficient because this range does not fall into that of the question.
For condition 2, |x|>x --> x<0. This is insufficient for the same reason.
Looking at them together, however, -1<x<0 falls into the range of the question, so this is sufficient, and the answer becomes (C).

For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
avatar
marvas8581
Joined: 07 Oct 2015
Last visit: 06 Jun 2016
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel,

For the A, how did you assume that remember that x<0

Thanks
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,388
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,388
Kudos: 778,221
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
marvas8581
Hi Bunuel,

For the A, how did you assume that remember that x<0

Thanks

There we consider two cases: (A) when x<0 and (B) when x>0. So, A we discard the range which is not less than 0 and for B discard the range which is not more than 0.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
GMATinsight
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 6,839
Own Kudos:
16,351
 [1]
Given Kudos: 128
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
Posts: 6,839
Kudos: 16,351
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x|< x

(2) |x| > x


Given : x is NOT equal to zero

Question : Is |x| < 1?

Statement 1: x/|x|< x

Case 1: If x <0, x/|x| = -1 i.e. x/|x|< x can be rewritten as -1< x i.e. -1< x < 0 Giving answer to the question as YES
Case 2: If x >0, x/|x| = +1 i.e. x/|x|< x can be rewritten as 1< x i.e. 1< x Giving answer to the question as NO
NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: |x| > x
|x| can be greater than x only if x is Negative because in all other cases both will be equal
i.e. x < 0 but x may be -0.5 Giving answer to the question as YES and x may be -1.5 Giving answer to the question as NO. Hence,
NOT SUFFICIENT

Combining the two statements
Combining -1< x < 0 and 1< x and x < 0

we get, only -1< x < 0 Giving answer to the question as YES. Hence,
SUFFICIENT

Answer: option C
avatar
cgarmestani
Joined: 18 Mar 2017
Last visit: 04 Apr 2018
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For (1), wouldn't x<0 give you:

-x/x < -x
-1 < -x
1 > x?

When I plug in numbers for that, it doesn't work, but I don't see how we get x/-x < x when plugging in x<0?


Bunuel
Hussain15
If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x|< x

(2) |x| > x

Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation.

\(x\neq{0}\), is \(|x|<1\)? Which means is \(-1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\))

(1) \(\frac{x}{|x|}< x\)
Two cases:
A. \(x<0\) --> \(\frac{x}{-x}<x\) --> \(-1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(-1<x<0\)

B. \(x>0\) --> \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) --> \(1<x\).

Two ranges \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). Which says that \(x\) either in the first range or in the second. Not sufficient to answer whether \(-1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(-0.5\) or \(3\))

Second approach: look at the fraction \(\frac{x}{|x|}\) it can take only two values:
1 for \(x>0\) --> so we would have: \(1<x\);
Or -1 for \(x<0\) --> so we would have: \(-1<x\) and as we considering the range for which \(x<0\) then completer range would be: \(-1<x<0\).

The same two ranges: \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\).

(2) \(|x| > x\). Well this basically tells that \(x\) is negative, as if x were positive or zero then \(|x|\) would be equal to \(x\). Only one range: \(x<0\), but still insufficient to say whether \(-1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(-0.5\) or \(-10\))

Or two cases again:
\(x<0\)--> \(-x>x\)--> \(x<0\).
\(x>0\) --> \(x>x\): never correct.


(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is the range \(-1<x<0\) (\(x<0\) (from 2) and \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\) (from 1), hence \(-1<x<0\)). Every \(x\) from this range is definitely in the range \(-1<x<1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,388
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,388
Kudos: 778,221
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
cgarmestani
For (1), wouldn't x<0 give you:

-x/x < -x
-1 < -x
1 > x?

When I plug in numbers for that, it doesn't work, but I don't see how we get x/-x < x when plugging in x<0?


Bunuel
Hussain15
If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x|< x

(2) |x| > x

Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation.

\(x\neq{0}\), is \(|x|<1\)? Which means is \(-1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\))

(1) \(\frac{x}{|x|}< x\)
Two cases:
A. \(x<0\) --> \(\frac{x}{-x}<x\) --> \(-1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(-1<x<0\)

B. \(x>0\) --> \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) --> \(1<x\).

Two ranges \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). Which says that \(x\) either in the first range or in the second. Not sufficient to answer whether \(-1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(-0.5\) or \(3\))

Second approach: look at the fraction \(\frac{x}{|x|}\) it can take only two values:
1 for \(x>0\) --> so we would have: \(1<x\);
Or -1 for \(x<0\) --> so we would have: \(-1<x\) and as we considering the range for which \(x<0\) then completer range would be: \(-1<x<0\).

The same two ranges: \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\).

(2) \(|x| > x\). Well this basically tells that \(x\) is negative, as if x were positive or zero then \(|x|\) would be equal to \(x\). Only one range: \(x<0\), but still insufficient to say whether \(-1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(-0.5\) or \(-10\))

Or two cases again:
\(x<0\)--> \(-x>x\)--> \(x<0\).
\(x>0\) --> \(x>x\): never correct.


(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is the range \(-1<x<0\) (\(x<0\) (from 2) and \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\) (from 1), hence \(-1<x<0\)). Every \(x\) from this range is definitely in the range \(-1<x<1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

If x < 0, then |x| = -x.

Substitute |x| by -x in x/|x|< x to get x/(-x) < x and then to get -1 < x. Since we consider the range when x < 0, then -1 < x < 0.
avatar
hardworkpays
Joined: 14 May 2017
Last visit: 26 Dec 2019
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 7
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
udaymathapati

Hi Bunuel,
Thanks for detail explanation. I am finding it difficult only last intersection part. Can you explain it further. My doubut is...If we combine "-1<x<0" or "x>1" these two inequalities, how come range for x fall betweeen -1<x<1 since x>1 is area which will not fit into this equation. Can you explain?

Range from (1): -----(-1)----(0)----(1)---- \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\), green area;

Range from (2): -----(-1)----(0)----(1)---- \(x<0\), blue area;

From (1) and (2): ----(-1)----(0)----(1)---- \(-1<x<0\), common range of \(x\) from (1) and (2) (intersection of ranges from (1) and (2)), red area.

Hope it's clear.

the red zone indicates that the range is -1<x<0 , how do we arrive at -1<x<1?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,388
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,388
Kudos: 778,221
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yousufkhan
Bunuel
udaymathapati

Hi Bunuel,
Thanks for detail explanation. I am finding it difficult only last intersection part. Can you explain it further. My doubut is...If we combine "-1<x<0" or "x>1" these two inequalities, how come range for x fall betweeen -1<x<1 since x>1 is area which will not fit into this equation. Can you explain?

Range from (1): -----(-1)----(0)----(1)---- \(-1<x<0\) or \(x>1\), green area;

Range from (2): -----(-1)----(0)----(1)---- \(x<0\), blue area;

From (1) and (2): ----(-1)----(0)----(1)---- \(-1<x<0\), common range of \(x\) from (1) and (2) (intersection of ranges from (1) and (2)), red area.

Hope it's clear.

the red zone indicates that the range is -1<x<0 , how do we arrive at -1<x<1?

The question asks whether \(-1<x<1\) is true. We got that \(-1<x<0\). Any, x from \(-1<x<0\) IS in the range from -1 to 1, so we have an YES answer to the question.
User avatar
Mahmud6
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 387
Own Kudos:
881
 [3]
Given Kudos: 235
Status:The best is yet to come.....
Posts: 387
Kudos: 881
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
Math Expert
105388 posts
496 posts