Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62619

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jun 2012, 09:10
alphabeta1234 wrote: Hey Bunuel,
Love your answers. But I want to suggest another method that is giving me some trouble when combining statesment (1) & (2)
1) \(\frac{x}{x}< x\) 2) \(x<x\)
Since \(0<x\) (x cannot equal 0), then we can rewrite statement 2, \(x<x\) as \(\frac{x}{x}< 1\).
We then subtract statment (1) and (2) as
1) \(\frac{x}{x}\frac{x}{x}< x1\) to get \(0< x1\) or \(1<x\) showing that x is outside the boundary of \(1<x<1\) and making the combined statements suffient. But \(1<x\), the derived statement of (1) and (2), contradicts statement (2), which claims that \(0<x\). What am I doing wrong?
Thank you! You can only add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction:If \(a>b\) and \(c>d\) (signs in same direction: \(>\) and \(>\)) > \(a+c>b+d\). Example: \(3<4\) and \(2<5\) > \(3+2<4+5\). You can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions:If \(a>b\) and \(c<d\) (signs in opposite direction: \(>\) and \(<\)) > \(ac>bd\) (take the sign of the inequality you subtract from). Example: \(3<4\) and \(5>1\) > \(35<41\). So, you cannot subtract \(\frac{x}{x}< 1\) from \(\frac{x}{x}< x\) since their signs are NOT in the opposite direction. Hope it's clear.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 12 May 2012
Posts: 66
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 650 Q51 V25 GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Transportation)

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jun 2012, 12:56
Hussain15 wrote: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1?
(1) x/x< x
(2) x > x
Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation. FOR THIS QUESTION: is x< 1 From (1)  Two cases. Case 1 x>0, x/x< x => x/x < x => x> 1 (Ans to Q stem No) Case 2 x<0, x/x< x => x/x > x => x< 1 (Ans to Q stem Yes) Hence Insuff. From (2)  We simply get that x < 0, Insuff. Combined (1) and (2), we see that only x is <0 Hence case 2. SufficientAns C



Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 89

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jun 2012, 04:21
Hello Bunuel, I tried to solve like this: Basically the question asks whether 1<x<1? Condition 1: x/x<x case 1: if x>0; x/x<x ==> 1<x ==> x>1 case 2: if x<0; x/x<x; since x<0, x >0 therefore, x<x2; x+x2 <0 ==> x(1+x)<0, therefore, 1<x<0 {Please confirm if I have derived this right} Given that we do not know the sign we cannot determine, hence condition 1 is insufficient
Condition 2: x>x ==> which means x cannot be > then 0. thus, x<0, independently condition 2 is not sufficient;
Combining C1 and C2: we arrive at case 2; but that proves that x does not lie between 1 and 1 but between 1 and 0.
Hence C. Please let me know in case I have done anything conceptually wrong!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62619

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jun 2012, 04:31
pavanpuneet wrote: Hello Bunuel, I tried to solve like this: Basically the question asks whether 1<x<1? Condition 1: x/x<x case 1: if x>0; x/x<x ==> 1<x ==> x>1 case 2: if x<0; x/x<x; since x<0, x >0 therefore, x<x2; x+x2 <0 ==> x(1+x)<0, therefore, 1<x<0 {Please confirm if I have derived this right} Given that we do not know the sign we cannot determine, hence condition 1 is insufficient
Condition 2: x>x ==> which means x cannot be > then 0. thus, x<0, independently condition 2 is not sufficient;
Combining C1 and C2: we arrive at case 2; but that proves that x does not lie between 1 and 1 but between 1 and 0.
Hence C. Please let me know in case I have done anything conceptually wrong! You've done everything right. Though for case 2 you could do as follows: \(x<0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > x is simply reduced: \(1<x\). Since we consider the range \(x<0\) then \(1<x<0\). Also for (1)+(2) we have that \(1<x<0\). So we can answer yes to the question whether \(1<x<1\). Hope it helps.
_________________



Director
Affiliations: GMATQuantum
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Posts: 596

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Jul 2012, 03:36
Here is a video explanation that takes a slightly different approach using graphs of basic functions: http://www.gmatquantum.com/sharedposts ... xxx.htmlCheers, Dabral



Intern
Joined: 08 Mar 2013
Posts: 11
WE: Analyst (Law)

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Apr 2013, 12:39
Bunuel wrote: Hussain15 wrote: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1?
(1) x/x< x
(2) x > x
Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation. \(x\neq{0}\), is \(x<1\)? Which means is \(1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\)) (1) \(\frac{x}{x}< x\) Two cases: A. \(x<0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(1<x<0\) . if x<0, doesn't x/x<x become x/x<x which simplifies to 1<x or x<1 ?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62619

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Apr 2013, 03:14
oyabu wrote: Bunuel wrote: Hussain15 wrote: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1?
(1) x/x< x
(2) x > x
Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation. \(x\neq{0}\), is \(x<1\)? Which means is \(1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\)) (1) \(\frac{x}{x}< x\) Two cases: A. \(x<0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(1<x<0\) . if x<0, doesn't x/x<x become x/x<x which simplifies to 1<x or x<1 ? When \(x<0\), then \(x=x\), thus \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) becomes \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\) but since \(x<0\), then \(1<x<0\). Hope it's clear.
_________________



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 16371
Location: United States (CA)

If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Jan 2015, 21:46
Hi, There are a handful of Number Property rules in this DS question that you can find by either TESTing VALUES or taking lots of notes. We're told that X cannot = 0. We're asked if X < 1. This is a YES/NO question. Fact 1: X/X < X This inequality requires a thorough examination of the possibilities. X CANNOT = 1 since 1/1 is NOT < 1 X can be ANY number > 1 though If X = 2.... 2/2 < 2 And the answer to the question is NO. X CANNOT be a positive fraction... If X = 1/2 (1/2)/1/2 = 1 which is NOT < 1/2 X could be ANY negative fraction though If X = 1/2 (1/2)/1/2 = 1 which IS < 1/2 And the answer to the question is YES. X CANNOT be 1 since 1/1 is NOT < 1 X CANNOT be < 1... X = 2 (2)/2 = 1 which is NOT < 2 According to all of this data, the possibilities are X > 1 or 1 < X < 0 Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT Fact 2: X> X Here, we know that X can be ANY negative, but CANNOT be positive. If X = 1/2 then the answer to the question is YES (we did the work already in Fact 1) If X = 2 then the answer to the question is NO Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT Combining Facts, we have... X > 1 or 1 < X < 0 AND X MUST be negative The ONLY possibilities that fit BOTH Facts ARE negative fractions. Thus the answer to the question will be ALWAYS YES. Combined, SUFFICIENT Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.comThe Course Used By GMAT Club Moderators To Earn 750+ souvik101990 Score: 760 Q50 V42 ★★★★★ ENGRTOMBA2018 Score: 750 Q49 V44 ★★★★★



Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Posts: 70
Location: Bangladesh
GMAT 1: 490 Q41 V18 GMAT 2: 610 Q45 V28
GPA: 2.75

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 May 2015, 06:19
Bunuel wrote: Hussain15 wrote: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1?
(1) x/x< x
(2) x > x
Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation. \(x\neq{0}\), is \(x<1\)? Which means is \(1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\)) (1) \(\frac{x}{x}< x\) Two cases: A. \(x<0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(1<x<0\) B. \(x>0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\). Two ranges \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). Which says that \(x\) either in the first range or in the second. Not sufficient to answer whether \(1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(0.5\) or \(3\)) Second approach: look at the fraction \(\frac{x}{x}\) it can take only two values: 1 for \(x>0\) > so we would have: \(1<x\); Or 1 for \(x<0\) > so we would have: \(1<x\) and as we considering the range for which \(x<0\) then completer range would be: \(1<x<0\). The same two ranges: \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). (2) \(x > x\). Well this basically tells that \(x\) is negative, as if x were positive or zero then \(x\) would be equal to \(x\). Only one range: \(x<0\), but still insufficient to say whether \(1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(0.5\) or \(10\)) Or two cases again: \(x<0\)> \(x>x\)> \(x<0\). \(x>0\) > \(x>x\): never correct. (1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is the range \(1<x<0\) (\(x<0\) (from 2) and \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\) (from 1), hence \(1<x<0\)). Every \(x\) from this range is definitely in the range \(1<x<1\). Sufficient. Answer: C. Thanks for your nice explanations. I am not clear on one issue though. As we can multiply an inequality by a variable only if we know its sign, how can we multiply both side of an inequality by an absolute value? Would you please explain..
_________________
Heading towards perfection>>



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62619

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 May 2015, 07:14
ranaazad wrote: Bunuel wrote: Hussain15 wrote: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1?
(1) x/x< x
(2) x > x
Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation. \(x\neq{0}\), is \(x<1\)? Which means is \(1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\)) (1) \(\frac{x}{x}< x\) Two cases: A. \(x<0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(1<x<0\) B. \(x>0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\). Two ranges \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). Which says that \(x\) either in the first range or in the second. Not sufficient to answer whether \(1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(0.5\) or \(3\)) Second approach: look at the fraction \(\frac{x}{x}\) it can take only two values: 1 for \(x>0\) > so we would have: \(1<x\); Or 1 for \(x<0\) > so we would have: \(1<x\) and as we considering the range for which \(x<0\) then completer range would be: \(1<x<0\). The same two ranges: \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). (2) \(x > x\). Well this basically tells that \(x\) is negative, as if x were positive or zero then \(x\) would be equal to \(x\). Only one range: \(x<0\), but still insufficient to say whether \(1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(0.5\) or \(10\)) Or two cases again: \(x<0\)> \(x>x\)> \(x<0\). \(x>0\) > \(x>x\): never correct. (1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is the range \(1<x<0\) (\(x<0\) (from 2) and \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\) (from 1), hence \(1<x<0\)). Every \(x\) from this range is definitely in the range \(1<x<1\). Sufficient. Answer: C. Thanks for your nice explanations. I am not clear on one issue though. As we can multiply an inequality by a variable only if we know its sign, how can we multiply both side of an inequality by an absolute value? Would you please explain.. An absolute value of a number cannot be negative (it's 0 or positive), and since we are given that x is not 0, then x is positive only.
_________________



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 16371
Location: United States (CA)

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x < x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Jun 2015, 15:19
Hi All, This DS question is built around some interesting Number Properties and patterns. If you can spot those patterns, then solving this problem should take considerably less time. This also looks like a question that can be beaten by TESTing VALUES. We're told that X CANNOT = 0. We're asked if X < 1. This is a YES/NO question. Fact 1: X/X < X Before TESTing VALUES, I want to note a pattern in this inequality: X/X will either equal 1 (if X is positive) OR 1 (if X is negative). This will save us some time when it comes to TESTing VALUES, since there are many values of X that will NOT fit this information. If X = 2, then the answer to the question is NO. X cannot be 1, any positive fraction, 0, or any negative integer….. So what's left to TEST….? If X = 1/2, then the answer to the question is YES. Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT Fact 2: X > X This tells us that X CANNOT be positive or 0. If X = 1, then the answer to the question is NO. If X = 1/2, then the answer to the question is YES. Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT Combined, we have deal with the "overlapping restrictions" that we noted in the two Facts: X cannot be….anything positive, 0, or any negative integer. X can ONLY BE negative fractions between 0 and 1. ALL of those answers (e.g. 1/2, .4, etc.) lead to a YES answer. Combined SUFFICIENT. Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.comThe Course Used By GMAT Club Moderators To Earn 750+ souvik101990 Score: 760 Q50 V42 ★★★★★ ENGRTOMBA2018 Score: 750 Q49 V44 ★★★★★



Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 99

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Jul 2015, 15:45
Bunuel wrote: Hussain15 wrote: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1?
(1) x/x< x
(2) x > x
Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation. \(x\neq{0}\), is \(x<1\)? Which means is \(1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\)) (1) \(\frac{x}{x}< x\) Two cases: A. \(x<0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(1<x<0\) B. \(x>0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\). Two ranges \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). Which says that \(x\) either in the first range or in the second. Not sufficient to answer whether \(1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(0.5\) or \(3\)) Second approach: look at the fraction \(\frac{x}{x}\) it can take only two values: 1 for \(x>0\) > so we would have: \(1<x\); Or 1 for \(x<0\) > so we would have: \(1<x\) and as we considering the range for which \(x<0\) then completer range would be: \(1<x<0\). The same two ranges: \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). (2) \(x > x\). Well this basically tells that \(x\) is negative, as if x were positive or zero then \(x\) would be equal to \(x\). Only one range: \(x<0\), but still insufficient to say whether \(1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(0.5\) or \(10\)) Or two cases again: \(x<0\)> \(x>x\)> \(x<0\). \(x>0\) > \(x>x\): never correct. (1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is the range \(1<x<0\) (\(x<0\) (from 2) and \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\) (from 1), hence \(1<x<0\)). Every \(x\) from this range is definitely in the range \(1<x<1\). Sufficient. Answer: C. I did mine a little differently. If x ≠ 0, is x < 1? Means: Is 1 < x < 1? (1) \(\frac{x}{x}< x\) x < x*x If x is positive, then: \(\frac{x}{x} < x\) which is the same as \(1 < x\) This means that \(1 > x > 1\) If x is negative, then: \(\frac{x}{x} > x\) which is the same as \(1 > x\) This means that \(1 < x < 1\) (we switch the direction of < to > because we divided by 1 to put x by itself). These two answers are inconsistent: x is both less than 1 and greater than 1. So, insufficient. (2) \(x > x\) This means that x is negative since the negative value of something is always less than the absolute value of something; whereas, a positive or 0 value of something is equal to its absolute value. If x is equal to a negative value less than 1, then it's within the range 1 < x < 1. But, if x is equal to a large negative value, x can be out of range, for example, x = 1,000. Therefore, (2) is insufficient. (1) + (2) x > x and x > 1 x is negative, and we know that x < 1. So, pick an arbitrary value less than 1, say, 5. Plug it into equation (1): \(\frac{5}{5} < 5\). Is \(1< 5\)? False. x does not refer to values < 1. x > x and x < 1 x is negative, and we know that x > 1. Therefore, \(1 < x < 0\). Pick an arbitrary value between 1 and 0, noninclusive, say, 0.5. Plug it into equation (1): \(\frac{0.5}{0.5} < 0.5\). Is \(1 < 0.5\)? Yes, this works. Sufficient. Answer C.



Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8781
GPA: 3.82

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Nov 2015, 09:24
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x < x (2) x > x If the range of the condition falls into that of the condition in terms of inequalities, the condition is sufficient. There is 1 variable in the original condition, and there are 2 equations provided by the 2 conditions, so there is high chance (D) will be our answer. For condition 1, if x>0, x/x<x > x/x<x > 1<x, then 1<x if x<0, x/x<x > x/x<x > 1<x, then 1<x<0. Therefore this condition is insufficient because this range does not fall into that of the question. For condition 2, x>x > x<0. This is insufficient for the same reason. Looking at them together, however, 1<x<0 falls into the range of the question, so this is sufficient, and the answer becomes (C). For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spareThe oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. "Only $79 for 1 month Online Course""Free Resources30 day online access & Diagnostic Test""Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself"



Intern
Joined: 07 Oct 2015
Posts: 5

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Mar 2016, 16:30
Hi Bunuel,
For the A, how did you assume that remember that x<0
Thanks



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62619

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Mar 2016, 22:48
marvas8581 wrote: Hi Bunuel,
For the A, how did you assume that remember that x<0
Thanks There we consider two cases: (A) when x<0 and (B) when x>0. So, A we discard the range which is not less than 0 and for B discard the range which is not more than 0. Hope it's clear.
_________________



CEO
Status: GMATINSIGHT Tutor
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 3467
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT EXPERT
WE: Education (Education)

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Mar 2016, 00:08
Quote: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1?
(1) x/x< x
(2) x > x
Given : x is NOT equal to zeroQuestion : Is x < 1?Statement 1: x/x< xCase 1: If x <0, x/x = 1 i.e. x/x< x can be rewritten as 1< x i.e. 1< x < 0 Giving answer to the question as YES Case 2: If x >0, x/x = +1 i.e. x/x< x can be rewritten as 1< x i.e. 1< x Giving answer to the question as NO NOT SUFFICIENT Statement 2: x > xx can be greater than x only if x is Negative because in all other cases both will be equal i.e. x < 0 but x may be 0.5 Giving answer to the question as YES and x may be 1.5 Giving answer to the question as NO. Hence, NOT SUFFICIENT Combining the two statementsCombining 1< x < 0 and 1< x and x < 0we get, only 1< x < 0 Giving answer to the question as YES. Hence, SUFFICIENT Answer: option C
_________________
Prosper!!!GMATinsight .............(Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha) email: info@GMATinsight.com l Call : +919999687183 / 9891333772 Online OneonOne Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West DelhiClick Here for Uneditable GOOGLE reviewsClick here for Our VERBAL & QUANT private tutoring package detailsMy Recent Posts Q1IntegerDivisibility l Q2Inequality DS l Q3Standard Deviation l Q4Functions ACCESS FREE GMAT TESTS HERE:22 FREE (FULL LENGTH) GMAT CATs LINK COLLECTION



Intern
Joined: 18 Mar 2017
Posts: 3

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Oct 2017, 13:02
For (1), wouldn't x<0 give you: x/x < x 1 < x 1 > x? When I plug in numbers for that, it doesn't work, but I don't see how we get x/x < x when plugging in x<0? Bunuel wrote: Hussain15 wrote: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1?
(1) x/x< x
(2) x > x
Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation. \(x\neq{0}\), is \(x<1\)? Which means is \(1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\)) (1) \(\frac{x}{x}< x\) Two cases: A. \(x<0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(1<x<0\) B. \(x>0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\). Two ranges \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). Which says that \(x\) either in the first range or in the second. Not sufficient to answer whether \(1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(0.5\) or \(3\)) Second approach: look at the fraction \(\frac{x}{x}\) it can take only two values: 1 for \(x>0\) > so we would have: \(1<x\); Or 1 for \(x<0\) > so we would have: \(1<x\) and as we considering the range for which \(x<0\) then completer range would be: \(1<x<0\). The same two ranges: \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). (2) \(x > x\). Well this basically tells that \(x\) is negative, as if x were positive or zero then \(x\) would be equal to \(x\). Only one range: \(x<0\), but still insufficient to say whether \(1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(0.5\) or \(10\)) Or two cases again: \(x<0\)> \(x>x\)> \(x<0\). \(x>0\) > \(x>x\): never correct. (1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is the range \(1<x<0\) (\(x<0\) (from 2) and \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\) (from 1), hence \(1<x<0\)). Every \(x\) from this range is definitely in the range \(1<x<1\). Sufficient. Answer: C.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62619

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Oct 2017, 20:17
cgarmestani wrote: For (1), wouldn't x<0 give you: x/x < x 1 < x 1 > x? When I plug in numbers for that, it doesn't work, but I don't see how we get x/x < x when plugging in x<0? Bunuel wrote: Hussain15 wrote: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1?
(1) x/x< x
(2) x > x
Will really appreciate if answer is supported by explanation. \(x\neq{0}\), is \(x<1\)? Which means is \(1<x<1\)? (\(x\neq{0}\)) (1) \(\frac{x}{x}< x\) Two cases: A. \(x<0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\). But remember that \(x<0\), so \(1<x<0\) B. \(x>0\) > \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) > \(1<x\). Two ranges \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). Which says that \(x\) either in the first range or in the second. Not sufficient to answer whether \(1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(0.5\) or \(3\)) Second approach: look at the fraction \(\frac{x}{x}\) it can take only two values: 1 for \(x>0\) > so we would have: \(1<x\); Or 1 for \(x<0\) > so we would have: \(1<x\) and as we considering the range for which \(x<0\) then completer range would be: \(1<x<0\). The same two ranges: \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\). (2) \(x > x\). Well this basically tells that \(x\) is negative, as if x were positive or zero then \(x\) would be equal to \(x\). Only one range: \(x<0\), but still insufficient to say whether \(1<x<1\). (For instance \(x\) can be \(0.5\) or \(10\)) Or two cases again: \(x<0\)> \(x>x\)> \(x<0\). \(x>0\) > \(x>x\): never correct. (1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is the range \(1<x<0\) (\(x<0\) (from 2) and \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\) (from 1), hence \(1<x<0\)). Every \(x\) from this range is definitely in the range \(1<x<1\). Sufficient. Answer: C. If x < 0, then x = x. Substitute x by x in x/x< x to get x/(x) < x and then to get 1 < x. Since we consider the range when x < 0, then 1 < x < 0.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 14 May 2017
Posts: 7

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Nov 2017, 06:09
Bunuel wrote: udaymathapati wrote: Hi Bunuel, Thanks for detail explanation. I am finding it difficult only last intersection part. Can you explain it further. My doubut is...If we combine "1<x<0" or "x>1" these two inequalities, how come range for x fall betweeen 1<x<1 since x>1 is area which will not fit into this equation. Can you explain? Range from (1): (1)(0)(1) \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\), green area; Range from (2): (1)(0)(1) \(x<0\), blue area; From (1) and (2): (1)(0)(1) \(1<x<0\), common range of \(x\) from (1) and (2) (intersection of ranges from (1) and (2)), red area. Hope it's clear. the red zone indicates that the range is 1<x<0 , how do we arrive at 1<x<1?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62619

Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Nov 2017, 06:22
yousufkhan wrote: Bunuel wrote: udaymathapati wrote: Hi Bunuel, Thanks for detail explanation. I am finding it difficult only last intersection part. Can you explain it further. My doubut is...If we combine "1<x<0" or "x>1" these two inequalities, how come range for x fall betweeen 1<x<1 since x>1 is area which will not fit into this equation. Can you explain? Range from (1): (1)(0)(1) \(1<x<0\) or \(x>1\), green area; Range from (2): (1)(0)(1) \(x<0\), blue area; From (1) and (2): (1)(0)(1) \(1<x<0\), common range of \(x\) from (1) and (2) (intersection of ranges from (1) and (2)), red area. Hope it's clear. the red zone indicates that the range is 1<x<0 , how do we arrive at 1<x<1? The question asks whether \(1<x<1\) is true. We got that \(1<x<0\). Any, x from \(1<x<0\) IS in the range from 1 to 1, so we have an YES answer to the question.
_________________




Re: If x is not equal to 0, is x less than 1? (1) x/x< x (2) x > x
[#permalink]
29 Nov 2017, 06:22



Go to page
Previous
1 2 3
Next
[ 46 posts ]



