Jun 18 09:00 PM EDT  10:00 PM EDT Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Tuesday, June 18th at 9 pm ET Jun 18 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Send along your receipt from another course or book to info@empowergmat.com and EMPOWERgmat will give you 50% off the first month of access OR $50 off the 3 Month Plan Only available to new students Ends: June 18th Jun 19 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Jun 22 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Jun 23 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 162

If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jan 2010, 19:31
Question Stats:
75% (01:22) correct 25% (01:34) wrong based on 676 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1623

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Apr 2011, 13:43
DestinyChild wrote: If XYZ>0 is X>0 XY > 0 XZ > 0 Obviously the answer is Yes or No; Get your kudos for reasoning out why the answer is C and keep an eye on time too Triple kudos for someone suggesting quicker technique for DS stems with triple variables...! Certainly each statement is not sufficient alone (the logic is identical for each: for S1, x and y can both be negative or both positive, and for S2, x and z can both be negative or both positive). You might notice that S1 tells us z is positive, and S2 tells us y is positive, but that's not what we're looking for. Now, together, the inequality xy > 0 means 'x and y have the same sign'. So from the two statements we know x and y have the same sign, and x and z have the same sign, so x, y and z all have the same sign. If xyz > 0, they must all be positive, and the answer is C.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com




Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2011
Posts: 18

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Apr 2011, 11:54
Following chart lists down the possible scenarios in which XYZ > 0
X Y Z 1)   + 2)  +  3) +   4) + + +
As per statement I > 1 & 4 have to be true for XY > 0. So I alone is insufficient as X can be +ve or ve As per statement II > 2& 4 have to be true for XZ > 0 So II alone is insufficient as X can be +ve or ve If we combine both statements then only 4 is true and X has to be +ve
Hence C.




VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1390

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jan 2010, 21:12
DestinyChild wrote: If XYZ>0 is X>0 XY > 0 XZ > 0 Obviously the answer is Yes or No; Get your kudos for reasoning out why the answer is C and keep an eye on time too Triple kudos for someone suggesting quicker technique for DS stems with triple variables...! xy > 0 both are positive or both negative xz > 0 both are positive or both negative if x < 0 then z < 0 and y < 0 but xyz < 0 so this doesn't work if x > 0 then y > 0 and z > 0 and xyz > 0 so this works and x > 0



Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 162

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jan 2010, 21:29
cheers lagomez
will give you one...!



Senior Manager
Status: No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 491

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Apr 2011, 09:51
1) x and y both are positive or negative, so x could be ve, or +ve insuff. 2) x and z both are positive or negative, so x could be ve, or +ve insuff. For C as xyz > 0, so if y and z both ve, then x has to be +ve, and if y and z become +ve then x has to be +ve to become xyz > 0.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
Posts: 131

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Apr 2011, 18:41
C. For XYZ > 0 either all are positive or two of them negative. From St1 and St2 it is clear that both xy and xz has to be positive or both xz and xy has to be negative. in the latter case XYZ > 0 will be false.



Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1364
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Apr 2011, 22:53
XYZ > 0 => X > 0 and YZ > 0 OR x < 0 and YZ < 0 (1) XY > 0 means x > 0 and Y > 0 OR X < 0 and Y < 0 So (1) is not sufficient (2) XZ > 0 means X > 0 and Z > 0 OR X < 0 and Z < 0 So (2) is not sufficient So if x < 0 then y < 0 and z < 0 => xyz < 0 which is contrary to what is given in question => x > 0 Answer C.
_________________
Formula of Life > Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant) GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Current Student
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 39
Location: Brazil
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q39 V38 GMAT 2: 700 Q47 V38

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Feb 2016, 10:38
This one is pure fun!
xyz>0 this means that we need two number with same sign and the Notre number must be positive. otherwise we would get a negative number.
1xy>0 Both x and y are positive or negative. NS
2xz>0 Both x and y are positive or negative. NS
1 and 2  xz>0 and xy>0  SUFFICIENT Lets assume that x is negative: if x is negative, then y must be negative and z must be negative. This would result in a negative number. This is not possible. So we are sure that X is positive.



Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 7465
GPA: 3.82

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Feb 2016, 05:57
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 When you modify the original condition and the question, they become xyz>0 > x>0? > yz>0?. There are 3 variables(x,y,z) and 1 equation(xyz>0), which should match with the number of equations. So, you need 2 more equations. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make C the answer. When 1) & 2), they become x(y^2)z>0. When dividing x(y^2)z>0 with y^2, it becomes yz>0, which is yes and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is C. l For cases where we need 2 more equations, such as original conditions with “2 variables”, or “3 variables and 1 equation”, or “4 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 70% chance that C is the answer, while E has 25% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since C is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, D or E.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spareThe oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. "Only $149 for 3 month Online Course""Free Resources30 day online access & Diagnostic Test""Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself"



Intern
Joined: 19 May 2016
Posts: 2

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 May 2016, 02:26
I solved this question "algebraically":
Question: xyz > 0 => x>0
(1) if xy > 0 dividing xyz > 0 by xy (inequality sign is not flipped) => z > 0 insufficient
(2) if xz > 0 dividing xyz > 0 by xz (inequality sign is not flipped) => y > 0 insufficient
(1&2) if z,y > 0 diving xyz > 0 by yz (inequality sign is not flipped) => x>0 sufficient
Is this a valid approach?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55670

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 May 2016, 03:16
benni089 wrote: I solved this question "algebraically":
Question: xyz > 0 => x>0
(1) if xy > 0 dividing xyz > 0 by xy (inequality sign is not flipped) => z > 0 insufficient
(2) if xz > 0 dividing xyz > 0 by xz (inequality sign is not flipped) => y > 0 insufficient
(1&2) if z,y > 0 diving xyz > 0 by yz (inequality sign is not flipped) => x>0 sufficient
Is this a valid approach? Yes, that's a valid approach.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 184
Location: South Africa
Concentration: International Business, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Insurance)

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 May 2016, 05:06
xyz > 0 x > 0? Stem: yz ? 0 a) xz > 0 : Says nothing about y b) xy > 0 : says nothing about z Combining both L a * b ( Since both are + ve) x^2 * yz > 0 x^2 always positive. So yz > 0. Answer C
_________________
Kudos if I helped



Manager
Joined: 03 Jan 2015
Posts: 72

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 May 2016, 14:06
DestinyChild wrote: If xyz > 0, is x > 0?
(1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 (1) xy > 0 > If xy > 0, x can be both positive or negative but z has to be greater than 0 (2) xz > 0 > If xz > 0, x can be both positive or negative but y has to be greater than 0 If z and y have to be greater than 0 then x has to be greater than 0 for xyz to be true. Therefore, answer choice C



Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 562

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2016, 13:28
DestinyChild wrote: If xyz > 0, is x > 0?
(1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 If xyz > 0, is x > 0? The only way for xyz to be positive all three are positive (x is +ve ; y is +ve and z is +ve) Or Only two of them are negative and one is positive (1) xy > 0 x can be negative ; y can be negative (or both x and y positive) INSUFFICIENT (2) xz > 0 x can be negative ; z can be negative (or both x and z positive) INSUFFICIENT MERGING BOTH x, y, z are all positive {therefore x is positive} x,y,z are all negative {therefore x is negative}; BUT ALL THREE CANNOT BE NEGATIVE; OTHERWISE INFO IN THE QUESTION STEM WILL BECOME INCORRECT. xyz>0 So, x y z can only be positive ANSWER IS C
_________________
Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly. FINAL GOODBYE : 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017  I am back but for all purposes please consider me semiretired.



Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 627
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jan 2017, 19:01
xyz > 0 in two cases: 1. all the numbers are positive. 2. two of the numbers are negative and the other is positve. st 1: xy > 0 This statement is insufficient because x could be positive or negative to make it work. It does give a useful piece of information though: if x and y are both postive, xy > 0 and therefore z would have to also be positve to make xyz > 0. or if x and y are both negative, xy > 0 and therefore z would have to be positve to make xyz > 0. Basically, the statement is saying that z must be positive. st 2: xz > 0 This statement is insufficient because x could be positive or negative to make it work. It does give a useful piece of information though: if x and z are both postive, xz > 0 and therefore y would have to also be positve to make xyz > 0. or if x and z are both negative, xz > 0 and therefore y would have to be positve to make xyz > 0. Basically, the statement is saying that y must be positive. Combined From the two statements we know that z must be positive (st 1) and y must be postive (st 2). If y and z are both positive, the only way that xyz will be > 0 is if x is positive or x > 0. Therefore C.
_________________
Thanks & Regards, Anaira Mitch



BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 513
Location: India
GPA: 4

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Sep 2017, 00:00
Bunuel wrote: benni089 wrote: I solved this question "algebraically":
Question: xyz > 0 => x>0
(1) if xy > 0 dividing xyz > 0 by xy (inequality sign is not flipped) => z > 0 insufficient
(2) if xz > 0 dividing xyz > 0 by xz (inequality sign is not flipped) => y > 0 insufficient
(1&2) if z,y > 0 diving xyz > 0 by yz (inequality sign is not flipped) => x>0 sufficient
Is this a valid approach? Yes, that's a valid approach. Hi Bunuel, I have a doubt over here (Sorry if it is lame but I somehow can't wrap my head around it) We can only divide two inequalities if both sides(LHS and RHS) of the two inequalities are positive and signs of inequalities(if one has > other should have < and vice versa) are opposite.With the above concept, how can we divide xyz>0 by xy>0 ? i. The Inequality sign is not opposite in both the inequalities ii. RHS in both the above inequalities is 0 (it's not positive) I know somewhere I am wrong above, need your help to clarify my doubt. Thanks in advance
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55670

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Sep 2017, 00:26
pikolo2510 wrote: Bunuel wrote: benni089 wrote: I solved this question "algebraically":
Question: xyz > 0 => x>0
(1) if xy > 0 dividing xyz > 0 by xy (inequality sign is not flipped) => z > 0 insufficient
(2) if xz > 0 dividing xyz > 0 by xz (inequality sign is not flipped) => y > 0 insufficient
(1&2) if z,y > 0 diving xyz > 0 by yz (inequality sign is not flipped) => x>0 sufficient
Is this a valid approach? Yes, that's a valid approach. Hi Bunuel, I have a doubt over here (Sorry if it is lame but I somehow can't wrap my head around it) We can only divide two inequalities if both sides(LHS and RHS) of the two inequalities are positive and signs of inequalities(if one has > other should have < and vice versa) are opposite.With the above concept, how can we divide xyz>0 by xy>0 ? i. The Inequality sign is not opposite in both the inequalities ii. RHS in both the above inequalities is 0 (it's not positive) I know somewhere I am wrong above, need your help to clarify my doubt. Thanks in advance For (1) we are dividing xyz > 0 by xy (which we are given to be positive) to get z > 0. For (2) we are dividing xyz > 0 by xz (which we are given to be positive) to get y > 0.
_________________



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 11392

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2018, 01:35
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0
[#permalink]
26 Oct 2018, 01:35






