It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 02:01

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2008
Posts: 85

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 4

In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2008, 05:55
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipation, setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property.

(A) setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
(B) setting free more than the 500 slaves legally considered as
(C) and set free more than 500 slaves, who were legally considered as
(D) and set free more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
(E) and he set free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered as

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 271

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 1

Re: SC - 500 Slaves [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2008, 06:03
In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipation, setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property.

(A) setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
BEST ANSWER filing and setting should be parallell.
(B) setting free more than the 500 slaves legally considered as
more than the is awkward.

(C) and set free more than 500 slaves, who were legally considered as
this is a 2/3 split (setting) is the right choice. So we eliminate C, D & E.
(D) and set free more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
(E) and he set free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered as

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 1

SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2472

Kudos [?]: 843 [0], given: 19

Re: SC - 500 Slaves [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2008, 13:01
klb15 wrote:
In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipation, setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property.

(A) setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
(B) setting free more than the 500 slaves legally considered as
(C) and set free more than 500 slaves, who were legally considered as
(D) and set free more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
(E) and he set free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered as

A. "setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered" is a modifying phrase. It modifies whole clause.

"setting" has nothing to do with "filing". Its a mare coincident that both are in participle form.
_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

Kudos [?]: 843 [0], given: 19

Manager
Affiliations: Beta Gamma Sigma
Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Posts: 209

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 3

Schools: Harvard, Penn, Maryland
Re: SC - 500 Slaves [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2008, 11:52
A, I'm not sure tho but you would think you'd see a comma before who. I guess since the clause is at the end of the sentence instead of the middle it doesn't need one, or is it because there is a the there: "the more than 500 slaves who were" instead of "more than 500 slaves, who were"....could someone clear that issue up for me?

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 3

Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: SC - 500 Slaves [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2008, 11:39
C, D and E can be eliminated straight away.

The deed of emancipation set the slaves free. Thus the slaves being freed is subordinate to the signing of the deed of emancipation.

In C,D and E, with 'and set ... ', it implies that the subject set the slaves free in a separate action from the signing of the deed of emancipation.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: SC - 500 Slaves   [#permalink] 31 Aug 2008, 11:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by