GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Aug 2018, 19:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 818
In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2009, 22:24
4
8
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (01:01) correct 42% (01:08) wrong based on 839 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made pie dough together using rolling pins and other utensils. Each father-son pair used a rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs, and each father repeated the phrase "rolling pin" each time his son used it. But when the children were asked to identify all of the rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that included several rolling pins, each child picked only the one that he had used.
Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above?

(A) The children did not grasp the function of rolling pin
(B) No two children understood the name "rolling pin" to apply to the same object
(C) The children understood that all rolling pins have the same general shape
(D) Each child was able to identify correctly only the utensils that he had used
(E) The children were not able to distinguish the rolling pins they used from other rolling pins

_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Most Helpful Expert Reply
MBA Section Director
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5124
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
*700* In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2015, 23:02
2
3
In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made pie dough together using rolling pins and other utensils. Each father-son pair used a rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs, and each father repeated the phrase “rolling pin” each time his son used it. But when the children were asked to identify all of the rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that included several rolling pins, each child picked only the one that he had used. Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above?

a) The children did not grasp the function of a rolling pin.

b) No two children understood the name “rolling pin” to apply to the same object.

c) The children understood that all rolling pins have the same general shape.

d) Each child was able to identify correctly only the utensils that he had used.

e) The children were not able to distinguish the rolling pins they used from other rolling pins.
_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 251
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2009, 22:37
1
nitya34 wrote:
In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made pie dough together using rolling pins and other utensils. Each father-son pair used a rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs, and each father repeated the phrase "rolling pin" each time his son used it. But when the children were asked to identify all of the rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that included several rolling pins, each child picked only the one that he had used.
Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above?

(A) The children did not grasp the function of rolling pin
The function is not relevant
(B) No two children understood the name "rolling pin" to apply to the same object
Looks good
(C) The children understood that all rolling pins have the same general shape
This is contrary to what we are told
(D) Each child was able to identify correctly only the utensils that he had used
We are only told about rolling pins, not utensils in general
E) The children were not able to distinguish the rolling pins they used from other rolling pins

This is contrary to what we are told.

Clear B
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 818
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2009, 23:04
Read this sentence
"father repeated the phrase "rolling pin" each time his son used it."

I tht its A
clearly between A and B
yet to find OA
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 251
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2009, 23:15
1
nitya34 wrote:
Read this sentence
"father repeated the phrase "rolling pin" each time his son used it."

I tht its A
clearly between A and B
yet to find OA


The meat of this stimulus has to do with identify (the function is a side note, if anything).
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 3
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2009, 11:52
I think its D.
Based on my assumption that the experiment's intention was to find out whether children could identify similar rolling pins or more generally similar utensils even as they were made to work with only one distinctive rolling pin.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1329
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2009, 21:57
1
1
nitya34 wrote:
In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made pie dough together using rolling pins and other utensils. Each father-son pair used a rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs, and each father repeated the phrase "rolling pin" each time his son used it. But when the children were asked to identify all of the rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that included several rolling pins, each child picked only the one that he had used.
Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above?

(A) The children did not grasp the function of rolling pin

You kidding me.. 2 year olds..

(B) No two children understood the name "rolling pin" to apply to the same object

Did not make sense on the first go. But this is the correct one. Because the children clearly distinguished one RP from another.For every child, there was only one RP in the group of RP's and utensils. In his mind, there is only one RP and he picked that one. If any one kid figured that at least two RP's are the same, he would pick another kids's RP.

(C) The children understood that all rolling pins have the same general shape

No they did not

(D) Each child was able to identify correctly only the utensils that he had used

(E) The children were not able to distinguish the rolling pins they used from other rolling pins


Crooked one and it is B.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 132
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2009, 19:22
1
B suggest that distinctively different rolling pins are considered different objects by each child. That explains why they can only choose the one they used
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 183
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2009, 19:03
B? Anyone can give a good explanation.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: mba here i come!
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 230
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2011, 12:43
3
D is incorrect because the passage never indicated that the children could identify only the utensils that they used. rolling pins, yes; utensils, no. a rolling pin is a utensil, but there are other utensils as well, and the stimulus does not give us information about whether the children could identify those utensils.
_________________

press +1 Kudos to appreciate posts
Download Valuable Collection of Percentage Questions (PS/DS)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 37
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2011, 01:16
I choose B.

In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made pie dough together using rolling pins and other utensils. Each father-son pair used a rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs, and each father repeated the phrase "rolling pin" each time his son used it. But when the children were asked to identify all of the rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that included several rolling pins, each child picked only the one that he had used.
Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above?

(A) The children did not grasp the function of rolling pin
As the kids were two years old, they could only grasp the shape/color/size (the distictiveness) of the rolling pin used by them respectively
(B) No two children understood the name "rolling pin" to apply to the same object
they chose only the rolling pin they used because they asssociate the sound rolling pin to that particular object they have experinece with.
(C) The children understood that all rolling pins have the same general shape
the statement says that the rolling pins were different from each other.
(D) Each child was able to identify correctly only the utensils that he had used
already stated
(E) The children were not able to distinguish the rolling pins they used from other rolling pins
contrary to the statement's conclusion
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2014
Posts: 12
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jun 2014, 21:43
Someone please explain why its not D? I mean obviously the children could identify the utensil he used.
VP
VP
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1018
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jun 2014, 04:43
2
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: folding sleeves up
Joined: 26 Apr 2013
Posts: 146
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 530 Q39 V23
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GPA: 3.5
WE: Consulting (Computer Hardware)
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2014, 06:56
nitya34 wrote:
In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made pie dough together using rolling pins and other utensils. Each father-son pair used a rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs, and each father repeated the phrase "rolling pin" each time his son used it. But when the children were asked to identify all of the rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that included several rolling pins, each child picked only the one that he had used.
Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above?

(A) The children did not grasp the function of rolling pin
(B) No two children understood the name "rolling pin" to apply to the same object
(C) The children understood that all rolling pins have the same general shape
(D) Each child was able to identify correctly only the utensils that he had used
(E) The children were not able to distinguish the rolling pins they used from other rolling pins



Experts,

Need your help here to understand why C is not the contender. My reasoning is as below:

Since each child was asked to pick all the rolling pins but he chose to pick only one he has used. Which means that he is searching for all the pins which looks similar to the one he has used and hence he was searching for the same general shape. And it must be true that child is not aware that rolling pins are distinct. But he couldn't find any other than the one he used. hence C.

what's the flaw in this reasoning?

looking for answers.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Posts: 151
GPA: 3.72
Reviews Badge
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Dec 2014, 23:23
C is opposite answer Reason 1- Had the students understood "that all rolling pins have the same general shape" , they would have picked up any of the rolling pins.
Reason 2 - Stimulus clearly says " rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs". We should not modify the stimulus in inference questions.
_________________

A lot needs to be learned from all of you.

MBA Section Director
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5124
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: *700* In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Apr 2015, 19:33
Quote:
The upshot of this interesting experiment is that each child associated the term “rolling pin” with only the exact object he had previously encountered, not with a category of objects that all serve the same purpose. So what can we infer from this? Since each boy only identified the rolling pin he and his father had used, and since all the rolling pins are different, we can infer (B): that no two boys associated the name “rolling pin” with the same object.
(A) There’s a subtle scope shift happening here; the children are asked to identify the pins, not explain how they’re used. The mere fact that they couldn’t extend the definition of rolling pin to other pins doesn’t mean they didn’t understand the function of the pin they did identify.
(C), if anything, runs counter to the stimulus, since the children did not seem to understand that the term “rolling pin” can refer to a category of objects. If (C) were true, chances are the boys would have been able to identify the other rolling pins in the room.
(D) Mind the scope! The conclusion deals only with rolling pins, so we have no right to extend this conclusion to include all the utensils used in the experiment.
(E) contradicts the stimulus. The children certainly could distinguish their own rolling pins from the others; otherwise, how could each child pick out from the rest of the rolling pins only the one he and his father had used?

_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 347
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: *700* In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Apr 2015, 22:27
In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made pie dough together using rolling pins and other utensils. Each father-son pair used a rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs, and each father repeated the phrase “rolling pin” each time his son used it. But when the children were asked to identify all of the rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that included several rolling pins, each child picked only the one that he had used. Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above?

a) The children did not grasp the function of a rolling pin.Most probably they did becuase they used the rolling pins in action. But over here the experiment tests something entirely different. It does not test the understanding of the function of the rolling pin by children but it tests whether children can identify a rolling pin.

b) No two children understood the name “rolling pin” to apply to the same object.Exactly, the children did not pick up other rolling pins but only the ones that they used for the pie dough. This shows that *all* of the children understood the name "rolling pin" to apply to one object, the object that they used.

c) The children understood that all rolling pins have the same general shape.No. On the contrary, the children understood that a rolling pin can only be 1.

d) Each child was able to identify correctly only the utensils that he had used.We do not know anything about what the children did with the other utensils during the experiment when children were asked to identify what they had used. We are only given information about rolling pins. What stands as true for one type of utensil, rolling pin, may not stand as true for the others.

e) The children were not able to distinguish the rolling pins they used from other rolling pins.The total opposite is suggested in the stem.
Retired Moderator
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2015
Posts: 862
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: LBS MIF '19
WE: Asset Management (Investment Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: *700* In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2015, 02:52
souvik101990 wrote:
In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made pie dough together using rolling pins and other utensils. Each father-son pair used a rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs, and each father repeated the phrase “rolling pin” each time his son used it. But when the children were asked to identify all of the rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that included several rolling pins, each child picked only the one that he had used. Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above?

a) The children did not grasp the function of a rolling pin.

b) No two children understood the name “rolling pin” to apply to the same object.

c) The children understood that all rolling pins have the same general shape.

d) Each child was able to identify correctly only the utensils that he had used.

e) The children were not able to distinguish the rolling pins they used from other rolling pins.


"No two children..." what's that? Is that the official AC or is something missing?
_________________

Saving was yesterday, heat up the gmatclub.forum's sentiment by spending KUDOS!

PS Please send me PM if I do not respond to your question within 24 hours.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2015
Posts: 259
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Re: *700* In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2015, 05:07
b
Each of the children thought of "rolling pin" to be a distinct object that was used by each.
_________________

Apoorv

I realize that i cannot change the world....But i can play a part :)

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2016
Posts: 34
Location: India
Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2016, 01:49
I had chosen D
But now it clicked me..for inference question we need to pick the safest option..that will be correct in any scenario (100% true)
_________________

When you are grateful - when you can see what you have - you unlock blessings to flow in your life

Re: In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made &nbs [#permalink] 07 Sep 2016, 01:49

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 26 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.