ShankSouljaBoi wrote:
in 4confused between A and E. Please help
ShankSouljaBoi - let me try. Let's understand the flow of the passage.
Para 1:
---------------
Author suggests that Poachers are illegally selling Ivory. This is causing
1) Environmental damages
2) Decrease in population of Elephants (poachers killing elephants)
A ban is introduced that partially addresses these 2 problems, however, core problem still needs to be addressed --> Countries (esp. poorer) do not have sufficient funding to combat poachers.
Just to explain this further -->
Tusks (teeth of an Elephant) are made from material called Ivory. It's very much "a in-demand substance". Due to scarcity of it, poachers kill elephants and sell the tusk/ivory at very huge price (para 1 also calls out for increase in the price). Again, you don't need to know this while solving para. I didn't know, but i could figure out that poachers are illegally trying to sell something at higher price.
---------------
Para 2:
Author further explains that these poorer countries are unable to stop poaching because they don't know origin of country for poaching. and suggests a POTENTIAL solution as well.
Just to explain this further -->
It means:
a) It is possible that elephants are being killed in Country1 and elephants's Tusk/Ivory is being sold in another country2 because it has more demand of Ivory.
b) Question is --> Who should control poaching? Country 1 OR Country 2?
c) Let's imagine that, Country2 is being blamed by international community for illegal trade happening on their land. If Country 2 is poorer and having unstable political environment, then obviously Country2's leaders will start pointing fingers.
d) Country 2 can say that problem is with Country 1 as they are allowing poachers to kill elephants. So ultimately there can be a "blame game".
e) In order to avoid this blame game --> Author suggests a potential solution --> a new DNA identification system.
---------------
Summary: in a nutshell, Para 1 explains a problem while para 2 further expands the root cause of problem and suggests a
potential solution.
Let's look at the choices A and E.
A. exposing the weaknesses of the ivory ban:This is just suggesting gist of para 1. however, we saw that author not only explains a problem but also provides a potential solution. Hence this is incorrect/partial summary of para.
E. detailing a way to overcome a problem that has lessened the effectiveness of the ivory banThis perfectly aligns with the summary that we deduced. Again, as
tarunanandani also explained, Option D is ruled out. There's already explanation provided above.
I hope this clarifies. Do let me know if you need more help.
---
Please give kudos