Last visit was: 20 Jun 2025, 15:53 It is currently 20 Jun 2025, 15:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Algebra|                        
avatar
loki
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
179
 [131]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 11
Kudos: 179
 [131]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
120
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 June 2025
Posts: 102,214
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,961
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,214
Kudos: 734,015
 [25]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jeeteshsingh
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Last visit: 03 Aug 2023
Posts: 178
Own Kudos:
994
 [14]
Given Kudos: 48
Posts: 178
Kudos: 994
 [14]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
piyatiwari
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Last visit: 15 Jun 2021
Posts: 313
Own Kudos:
435
 [1]
Given Kudos: 46
Location: United States (MA)
Posts: 313
Kudos: 435
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer: "E" : Both statements not sufficient

Reason:
(plugging in method)

Statement 1: Say r = 1/3 and s = 3

satisfies statement 1 i.e. rs = 1 but cant comment about value of rst as t is still unknown.

Statement 2: Say t = 1/3 and s = 3

satisfies statement 1 i.e. st = 1 but cant comment about value of rst as t is still unknown.

Now if both statements are taken together, r=1/3 s=3 and t=1/3 => rst not equal to 1.

hence both the statements are not sufficient.
avatar
loki
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
179
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 11
Kudos: 179
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
piyatiwari
Answer: "E" : Both statements not sufficient


Now if both statements are taken together, r=1/3 s=3 and t=1/3 => rst not equal to 1.

hence both the statements are not sufficient.

But from your response above combining the two statements tells us conclusively that rst not eqaul to 1. Therefore combining the two statements is sufficient to answer the question as a 'NO'. So shouldn't the answer be 'C'
User avatar
piyatiwari
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Last visit: 15 Jun 2021
Posts: 313
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Location: United States (MA)
Posts: 313
Kudos: 435
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
loki
piyatiwari
Answer: "E" : Both statements not sufficient


Now if both statements are taken together, r=1/3 s=3 and t=1/3 => rst not equal to 1.

hence both the statements are not sufficient.

But from your response above combining the two statements tells us conclusively that rst not eqaul to 1. Therefore combining the two statements is sufficient to answer the question as a 'NO'. So shouldn't the answer be 'C'


Oh yes. My usual mistake :). Thanks so much Loki. This goes directly to my error log.

So the answer is "C"
User avatar
TheSituation
Joined: 09 Dec 2009
Last visit: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
179
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
 Q40  V35 GMAT 2: 670  Q44  V38
Posts: 98
Kudos: 179
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ok, without a doubt my number property skills are my achillies heel when is comes to GMAT quant.

I was reviewing my error log today. Tell me why my logic is wrong.

95. Is rst=1

(1) rs=1
(2) st=1

I attacked it by rearranging the original equations, dividing both sides by t.

so, rs=1/t
then sub in rs=1
so, 1=1/t
then cross multiply t=1
Combined with what we already know (rs=1) we have 1*1=1
Therefore, sufficient.

Same logic can be applied to statment 2.
Therefore my answer was D.

OA is actually E and I understand how they got it, but I also fail to see why my strategy was wrong. I feel like I'm probably overlooking some basic rule that governs all equations here but if someone could help me out that'd be great.

Thanks
User avatar
pm4553
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Last visit: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 329
Own Kudos:
136
 [1]
Given Kudos: 92
Concentration: General Management
WE 1: Investment Banking - 6yrs
Posts: 329
Kudos: 136
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Currency
Ok, without a doubt my number property skills are my achillies heel when is comes to GMAT quant.

I was reviewing my error log today. Tell me why my logic is wrong.

95. Is rst=1

(1) rs=1
(2) st=1

I attacked it by rearranging the original equations, dividing both sides by t.

so, rs=1/t
then sub in rs=1
so, 1=1/t
then cross multiply t=1
Combined with what we already know (rs=1) we have 1*1=1
Therefore, sufficient.

Same logic can be applied to statment 2.
Therefore my answer was D.

OA is actually E and I understand how they got it, but I also fail to see why my strategy was wrong. I feel like I'm probably overlooking some basic rule that governs all equations here but if someone could help me out that'd be great.

Thanks
Okay, you can really deal with this much simpler. But, let's review what you've done.

I attacked it by rearranging the original equations, dividing both sides by t.
so, rs=1/t


your question then changes to -- Is rs=1/t?
1. Does this give the vale of t? No. Even if you use (1), you get -- 1=1/t -> t=1. Does this answer your question. No. A/D out
2. Similarly, does the value of st=1, help us in answering the question? No. B out

Hope this helps.
User avatar
TheSituation
Joined: 09 Dec 2009
Last visit: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
179
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
 Q40  V35 GMAT 2: 670  Q44  V38
Posts: 98
Kudos: 179
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
"The question is asking u to prove that... and you are considering the same as True. This isnt the correct approach."

This is what I was missing. Normally I'd instinctively follow that, but I think cause it was in my error log I over-thought it and got fancy - effectively confusing myself. Ha!

Thanks for the quick repsonses guys, much appreciated!
User avatar
silasaaa2
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2012
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
74
 [2]
Given Kudos: 5
 Q45  V27 GMAT 2: 640  Q47  V31
GPA: 3.32
Posts: 53
Kudos: 74
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i) rs=1
r=1/3 s=3 and t=7 so ans is no
r=1/3 s=3 and t=1 so ans is yes
not suff.

ii) st=1
s=1/3 and t=3 and r=7 so ans is no
r=1/3 s=3 and t=1 so ans is yes

not sufficient

combining both 1 and 2

s=1/3 r=3 and t=3 still it satisfies both eq but rst is not 1

if s=1 r=1 and t=1 it satisifies both eq. and rst is 1

so ans is E
User avatar
icaniwill
Joined: 05 Oct 2011
Last visit: 29 Nov 2016
Posts: 124
Own Kudos:
92
 [3]
Given Kudos: 62
Products:
Posts: 124
Kudos: 92
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i) rs=1
As we don't know anything about value of t so we cant answer if rst = 1. Insufficient.

ii) st=1
As we don't know anything about value of r so we cant answer if rst = 1. Insufficient.

Combining both 1 and 2

(rs)(st) = 1
(rst)s = 1
rst = 1/s

As we don't know the value of s. rst can be anything (1 or something else). we cannot answer "Is rst = 1?"

Insufficient
Ans: E
avatar
4sguy
Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Last visit: 26 Apr 2013
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Its clear that 1 and 2 do not lead to a solution. then, Cant this be solved by observing that we have 2 equations and 3 unknown variables. hence not sufficient and hence E?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 June 2025
Posts: 102,214
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,961
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,214
Kudos: 734,015
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
4sguy
Its clear that 1 and 2 do not lead to a solution. then, Cant this be solved by observing that we have 2 equations and 3 unknown variables. hence not sufficient and hence E?

That's not entirely correct. Notice that we are asked to find whether rst = 1, not the values of the unknowns.

For example if the question were:

Is rst = 1 ?

(1) rs = 0
(2) st = 1

The answer would be A not E.
User avatar
sambam
Joined: 18 Oct 2011
Last visit: 09 Jan 2014
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GMAT Date: 01-30-2013
GPA: 3.3
Posts: 58
Kudos: 401
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
statement 1: don't know anything about t. not sufficient
statement 2: don't know anything about r. not sufficient

put them together: rst could equal (1)(1)(1) in which case would be 1. or rst could equal (1/2)(2)(1/2) in which case rst = 1/2. Not sufficient

Answer: E
User avatar
erikvm
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Last visit: 19 Mar 2017
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
225
 [2]
Given Kudos: 43
Posts: 92
Kudos: 225
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I found that the easiest way to tackle this problem was as following:

(A) rs = 1 means r and s have same sign. Make a chart:


r s
+ +
- -

Clearly not sufficient

(B)

st = 1 means s and t have same sign. Make a chart:

s t
+ +
- -

Clearly not sufficient


combined:

r s t
+ + +
- - -

two different solutions: -1 or 1, hence (E)

Incredibly fast solution, took less than 15 seconds
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,681
Own Kudos:
19,338
 [9]
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,681
Kudos: 19,338
 [9]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Going through the solutions posted by students in this thread, I realized that this question is a good illustration of the perils of 'solve by substituting numbers' approach. A student considered one set of possible values of r, s and t and thought that since he was able to get a tangible value of the product rst that was not equal to 1, this meant the 2 statements together were sufficient. It didn't occur to him at that time (later he did realize this oversight) that other values of r, s and t were also possible that did lead to rst = 1.

To eliminate all this uncertainty about whether you've considered all possible sets of values for the different unknowns, I would like to suggest the algebraic way of thinking through this question. Here's how I would solve it:

The question asks if rst = 1 (Note to self: it's not mentioned that r, s and t are integers. So, they might very well be fractions)

1. rs = 1
But t = ? Don't know :(

Insufficient

2. st = 1
But r = ? Don't know :(

Insufficient.

1 + 2

The question asks about the product rst.
This product can be written as \(\frac{(rs)(st)}{s}\). Substituting the values of rs and st from St. 1 and 2, we get:

rst = \(\frac{(1)(1)}{s}\) = \(\frac{1}{s}\)

But s = ? Don't know :(

If s = 1, rst = 1
But if s = some other value, rst is not equal to 1.

So, clearly insufficient.

Answer: Option E


I hope this alternate solution was helpful for you :)

Best Regards

Japinder
avatar
jmaz88
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Last visit: 04 Apr 2016
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: United States
WE:Analyst (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1.) Tells us nothing about t - INS (eliminate A/D from grid)
2.) Tells us nothing about r - INS (eliminate B from grid)

Combined (left with C or E)
r*s = 1
s*t = 1

a.) 1*1*1 = 1 True
b.) 1/4 * 4 * 1/4 = 1 False

Therefore answer is E
User avatar
JeffTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 3,003
Own Kudos:
7,859
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,646
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,003
Kudos: 7,859
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
loki
Is rst = 1 ?

(1) rs = 1
(2) st = 1

Solution:

We need to determine whether RST = 1.

Statement One Alone:

RS = 1

Since we don’t know the value of T, knowing only that RS = 1 is not sufficient to determine whether RST = 1. We can eliminate answer choices A and D.

Statement Two Alone:

ST = 1

Since we don’t know the value of R, knowing only that ST = 1, is not sufficient to determine whether RST = 1. We can eliminate answer choice B.

Statements One and Two Together:

From statements one and two we know that RS = 1 and that ST = 1. Thus, we can say that:

RS = ST

RS – ST = 0

S(R – T) = 0

S = 0 or R = T

Because RS and ST both equal 1, S cannot be 0. Thus, R = T.

However, knowing that R = T is not enough information to determine whether RST = 1.

For example, if R = T = 1, then S = 1 (since RS = 1 and ST = 1), RST = 1.

However, if R = T = 2, then S = ½ (since RS = 1 and ST = 1), RST = 2  1.

The answer is E.
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 13 May 2024
Posts: 6,757
Own Kudos:
33,884
 [3]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,757
Kudos: 33,884
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
loki
Is rst = 1 ?

(1) rs = 1
(2) st = 1

Target question: Is rst=1?

Statement 1: rs = 1
No information about t
INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2: st = 1
No information about r
INSUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
So, rs = 1 and st = 1
This means that rs/st = 1/1
Simplify to get r/t = 1
This tells us that r = t, so this is all that we can conclude one we combine the statements.

If r = t, there are still several values of r, s and t that satisfy the both statements. Here are two:
Case a: r = 1, s = 1 and t = 1, in which case rst = 1
Case b: r = 0.5, s = 2 and t = 0.5, in which case rst = 0.5
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer = E

Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
mtk10
Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Last visit: 19 Mar 2018
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V34
GPA: 3.41
WE:Business Development (Accounting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V34
Posts: 46
Kudos: 16
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPrepNow
loki
Is rst = 1 ?

(1) rs = 1
(2) st = 1

Target question: Is rst=1?

Statement 1: rs = 1
No information about t
INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2: st = 1
No information about r
INSUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
So, rs = 1 and st = 1
This means that rs/st = 1/1
Simplify to get r/t = 1
This tells us that r = t, so this is all that we can conclude one we combine the statements.

If r = t, there are still several values of r, s and t that satisfy the both statements. Here are two:
Case a: r = 1, s = 1 and t = 1, in which case rst = 1
Case b: r = 0.5, s = 2 and t = 0.5, in which case rst = 0.5
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer = E

Cheers,
Brent

I would urge all experts on forums to provide solutions like this one, we are learning and often experts forget we need layman basic terminology to really grip the concepts. I have read all the solutions and at the end, i understood from this post.

I have great respect for Bunnel, but man sometimes you forget that all do not share your level of expertise on this content. Using words helps us students a lot. Thank you for the post
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
102214 posts
424 posts