Debo1988
Bunuel VeritasKarishmaCan we use the following approach for statement 2?
statement 2 : x^2 + x < 5
As soon as i see this statement, my instinct tells me to break it in the form (x-a)(x-b)<0, which will give me a range for x.
But we can't do that easily because x^2 + x -5 doesn't yield integral roots.
Instead can we proceed as below ? :
x^2 + x < 5
=> x^2 + x < 6 (combining the 2 inequalities :
x^2 + x < 5 and
5 < 6 )
=> (x-2)(x+3) < 0
=> -3 < x < 2 (Sufficient)
Do you see any risk in such an approach?
Note that not every value in the range -3 < x < 2 will satisfy the original inequality x^2 + x < 5 (e.g. x = 1.9, -2.8 etc don't)
though all values which will satisfy this inequality will fall in this range.
Basically, by increasing 5 to 6, you have widened the actual range of values.
So if x is less than 2 for x^2 + x < 6, it will certainly be less than 2 for x^2 + x < 5 too.
Also, it is not mandatory that the same approach needs to be followed in every question.
Yes, x^2 + x < 5 reminds me of a quadratic too but I also have my eye on x < 5 in the question stem. So I see that the only extra term stmtn 2 has is x^2 which I know cannot be negative. So even when I add 0 or a positive number to 5, the total is still less than 5. Then x must be less than 5. That's it!