GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 12 Dec 2019, 02:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# It was done by meticulously typesetting

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5197
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
It was done by meticulously typesetting  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2017, 11:08
2
Top Contributor
7
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (01:26) correct 37% (01:37) wrong based on 392 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

It was done by meticulously typesetting manuscripts letter by letter, before the development of digital typesetting, which allows typographers to not only finalize a copy-edited script for publishing but also create page layouts in a virtual setting.

A) It was done by meticulously typesetting manuscripts letter by letter, before the development of digital typesetting
B) Manuscripts had to be meticulously typeset letter by letter before the development of digital typesetting
C) Typographers had to meticulously typeset letter by letter before they developed digital typesetting
D) Before developing digital typesetting, manuscripts were meticulously typeset letter by letter
E) Before the development of digital typesetting, manuscripts had to be meticulously typeset letter by letter
meticulously typeset letter by letter

P. S. I saw this topic in a face book posting. This question is claimed to have appeared in some CAT( probably the IIM CAT). AS I couldn't know the original source, obviously, we have to arrive at a consensus.

_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't pole-vault above 630, spare 30 hours and you can fly on top.
"Winners never quit and quitters never win". (+919884544509)
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2015
Posts: 162
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
Re: It was done by meticulously typesetting  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2017, 11:21
Came down to B and C.
Chose C because I felt B is wrong as actual doer of action i.e typograper is mentioned in the underlined section.

Kindly correct my reasoning if wrong.

Sent from my Lenovo TAB S8-50LC using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Manager
Joined: 20 Jan 2016
Posts: 174
Re: It was done by meticulously typesetting  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2017, 07:01
I will go with B. We need digital typesetting at the end because which modifies digital typesetting
So D and E are out.

A is vague

I am confused between B and C but I chose B. I think it boiled down to the meaning of the sentence.
Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 87
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
Re: It was done by meticulously typesetting  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2017, 07:12
I think that it should be B because typographers didn't have to be typeset. Additionally this question has comma which introduces a relative clause.
Intern
Joined: 21 Nov 2016
Posts: 16
Re: It was done by meticulously typesetting  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2017, 08:33
1
Go for B because Typographers are not persons who develop the new technique.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Posts: 123
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Re: It was done by meticulously typesetting  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2017, 08:54
Chose B

A) Pronoun it is ambiguous. It is not clear, what was done by meticulously type setting
B) Correct
C) Usage of pronoun "they" is erraneous
D) "which" in the non underlined portion is not referring to digital type setting
E) "which" in the non underlined portion is not referring to digital type setting
Intern
Joined: 01 Jun 2016
Posts: 27
Re: It was done by meticulously typesetting  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2017, 07:13
daagh wrote:
It was done by meticulously typesetting manuscripts letter by letter, before the development of digital typesetting, which allows typographers to not only finalize a copy-edited script for publishing but also create page layouts in a virtual setting.

A) It was done by meticulously typesetting manuscripts letter by letter, before the development of digital typesetting
B) Manuscripts had to be meticulously typeset letter by letter before the development of digital typesetting
C) Typographers had to meticulously typeset letter by letter before they developed digital typesetting
D) Before developing digital typesetting, manuscripts were meticulously typeset letter by letter
E) Before the development of digital typesetting, manuscripts had to be meticulously typeset letter by letter
meticulously typeset letter by letter

P. S. I saw this topic in a face book posting. This question is claimed to have appeared in some CAT( probably the IIM CAT). AS I couldn't know the original source, obviously, we have to arrive at a consensus.

Though B is best among all, isn't option B has redundancy of HAD/BEFORE?
Manager
Joined: 14 Jan 2017
Posts: 120
Location: India
It was done by meticulously typesetting  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2018, 02:17
atomicmass wrote:
daagh wrote:
It was done by meticulously typesetting manuscripts letter by letter, before the development of digital typesetting, which allows typographers to not only finalize a copy-edited script for publishing but also create page layouts in a virtual setting.

A) It was done by meticulously typesetting manuscripts letter by letter, before the development of digital typesetting
B) Manuscripts had to be meticulously typeset letter by letter before the development of digital typesetting
C) Typographers had to meticulously typeset letter by letter before they developed digital typesetting
D) Before developing digital typesetting, manuscripts were meticulously typeset letter by letter
E) Before the development of digital typesetting, manuscripts had to be meticulously typeset letter by letter
meticulously typeset letter by letter

P. S. I saw this topic in a face book posting. This question is claimed to have appeared in some CAT( probably the IIM CAT). AS I couldn't know the original source, obviously, we have to arrive at a consensus.

Though B is best among all, isn't option B has redundancy of HAD/BEFORE?

Even I have the same doubt. Can any expert shed some light on the above question? daagh GMATNinja carcass sayantanc2k
Intern
Joined: 30 May 2017
Posts: 36
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Re: It was done by meticulously typesetting  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2018, 08:54
It was done by meticulously typesetting manuscripts letter by letter, before the development of digital typesetting, which allows typographers to not only finalize a copy-edited script for publishing but also create page layouts in a virtual setting.

A) It was done by meticulously typesetting manuscripts letter by letter, before the development of digital typesetting
B) Manuscripts had to be meticulously typeset letter by letter before the development of digital typesetting
C) Typographers had to meticulously typeset letter by letter before they developed digital typesetting
D) Before developing digital typesetting, manuscripts were meticulously typeset letter by letter
E) Before the development of digital typesetting, manuscripts had to be meticulously typeset letter by letter

Hi ,

There's a clear split here abc and de
de is incorrect because which can't refer back to the act of typing(basically any verb since it's a pronoun and must refer back only to a noun non ambiguously)
Here which refers to digital typesetting.
A is wrong as we don't know what it refers to.
B makes it clear that Manuscripts had to be typset
C suggests that the typographers developed digital typesetting hence wrong.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2849
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: It was done by meticulously typesetting  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2018, 08:35
1
aalekhoza wrote:
atomicmass wrote:
daagh wrote:
It was done by meticulously typesetting manuscripts letter by letter, before the development of digital typesetting, which allows typographers to not only finalize a copy-edited script for publishing but also create page layouts in a virtual setting.

A) It was done by meticulously typesetting manuscripts letter by letter, before the development of digital typesetting
B) Manuscripts had to be meticulously typeset letter by letter before the development of digital typesetting
C) Typographers had to meticulously typeset letter by letter before they developed digital typesetting
D) Before developing digital typesetting, manuscripts were meticulously typeset letter by letter
E) Before the development of digital typesetting, manuscripts had to be meticulously typeset letter by letter
meticulously typeset letter by letter

P. S. I saw this topic in a face book posting. This question is claimed to have appeared in some CAT( probably the IIM CAT). AS I couldn't know the original source, obviously, we have to arrive at a consensus.

Though B is best among all, isn't option B has redundancy of HAD/BEFORE?

Even I have the same doubt. Can any expert shed some light on the above question? daagh GMATNinja carcass sayantanc2k

There is no rule that "had" and "before" cannot be used together - probably you confused with the use of past perfect with "before". Here "had" is the simple past tense (of the verb "to have"), not past perfect. So option B is alright.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7298
Re: It was done by meticulously typesetting  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2019, 09:02
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: It was done by meticulously typesetting   [#permalink] 20 Mar 2019, 09:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by